#fedora-meeting-2: F24 Final Go/No-Go meeting #2

Meeting summary

1. Roll Call (jkurik, 17:00:09)
   
2. Purpose of this meeting (jkurik, 17:02:06)
   1. Purpose of this meeting is to check whether or not F24 final is ready for shipment, according to the release criteria. (jkurik, 17:02:07)
   2. This is determined in a few ways: (jkurik, 17:02:09)
   3. - No remaining blocker bugs (jkurik, 17:02:11)
   4. - Release candidate compose is available (jkurik, 17:02:12)
   5. - Test matrices for Final are fully completed (jkurik, 17:02:14)
   6. https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/24/final/buglist (jkurik, 17:02:15)
   7. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Final_Release_Criteria (jkurik, 17:02:17)
   8. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Fedora_24_RC_Test_Results (jkurik, 17:02:18)
   
   
3. Current status (jkurik, 17:02:20)
   1. This is the second round of the Go/No-Go meeting of Fedora 24 Final (jkurik, 17:02:26)
   2. The RC for the Fedora 24 Final is available as Fedora 24 RC 1.2 (20160614.0) (jkurik, 17:02:33)
   3. https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/24/Fedora-24-20160614.0/ (jkurik, 17:02:40)
   4. https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6423#comment:13 (jkurik, 17:02:45)
   5. Currently we have 2 proposed and none approved Blockers (jkurik, 17:02:51)
   6. We have 2 proposed and 5 accepted Freeze Exceptions (jkurik, 17:02:59)
   7. https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/24/final/buglist (jkurik, 17:03:06)
   
   
4. Mini-Blocker Review (jkurik, 17:03:59)
   
5. (1347273) There is no Windows entry in grub after installation to dual boot (adamw, 17:04:14)
   1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347273 (adamw, 17:04:15)
   2. Proposed Blocker, grub2, NEW (adamw, 17:04:15)
   3. AGREED: 1347273 - RejectedBlocker - this is unfortunate but it's only coming to light very late, we have little data but so far it seems specific to firmware RAID, and there are other mechanisms for achieving boot on UEFI, so the combined impact is too low to consider this a blocker at this point (adamw, 17:15:14)
   
   
6. (1347291) Booting from Windows 10 entry ends with 'relocation failed' error (adamw, 17:16:13)
   1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347291 (adamw, 17:16:13)
   2. Proposed Blocker, grub2, NEW (adamw, 17:16:13)
   3. AGREED: 1347291 - RejectedBlocker - there definitely seems to be a bug here, but we know it works in at least several cases (so far reports are ~50/50) and the firmware boot interface can be used by anyone with a sensible firmware (adamw, 17:49:59)
   
   
7. Test Matrices coverage (jkurik, 17:52:47)
   1. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_RC_1.2_Summary (jkurik, 17:52:53)
   2. AGREED: nirik affirms there's no mechanism for update notification in Xfce, so we agree in principle to except Xfce from the criterion "Release-blocking desktops must notify the user of available updates, but must not do so when running as a live image.", which makes the lack of an Xfce result for that test case irrelevant (adamw, 18:05:46)
   3. AGREED: Coverage of Test Matrices for RC 1.2 is sufficiently completed (jkurik, 18:31:04)
   
   
8. Go/No-Go decision (jkurik, 18:31:28)
   1. AGREED: The RC 1.2 compose is considered as GOLD and the final decision for Fedora 24 Final is "GO" (jkurik, 18:33:19)
   
   
9. Open floor (jkurik, 18:33:47)
   1. ACTION: jkurik to publish the Go/No-Go result (jkurik, 18:34:23)

Action items

1. jkurik to publish the Go/No-Go result

Action items, by person

1. jkurik
   1. jkurik to publish the Go/No-Go result

People present (lines said)

1. adamw (125)
2. jkurik (86)
3. nirik (29)
4. dgilmore (24)
5. pjones (23)
6. striker (19)
7. coremodule (16)
8. cmurf (13)
9. zodbot (10)
10. mattdm (8)
11. pwhalen (6)
12. nb (4)
13. Southern_Gentlem (2)
14. fale (1)