#fedora-meeting: Cloud SIG

Meeting summary

1. Who's Cloudy? (rbergeron, 19:01:27)
   
2. OpenNebula (rbergeron, 19:03:57)
   1. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/OpenNebula (spstarr, 19:06:04)
   2. http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-09-02/cloud_sig,_where_the_mustard_indicates_awesome.2011-09-02-18.59.html (spstarr, 19:06:27)
   3. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Ruby_1.9.3#Scope "Drafts of new packaging guidelines will have to be proposed to FPSCo. No such drafts currently exist. " :-( (abadger1999, 19:16:50)
   
   
3. EC2 (rbergeron, 19:20:20)
   
4. Gluster-land (rbergeron, 19:44:19)
   1. EPEL6 builds of gluster and hekafs are in the fedora updates pipeline, karma is welcomed but not required :) (rbergeron, 19:47:08)
   
   
5. Back to this EC2 Bug (rbergeron, 19:48:19)
   1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747692 (rbergeron, 19:48:27)
   2. if anyone hits this bug the system and cloud-init logs would be useful, so far we only have console output (rbergeron, 19:50:04)
   3. see bug commentary, if you need help getting logs off your instance either read the EC2 primer or ask in #fedora-cloud (rbergeron, 19:51:50)
   
   
6. Aeolus (rbergeron, 19:52:07)
   1. ACTION: mmorsi to investigate with ruby-sig/vit about (a) changes to packaging guidelines (b) feature filing (c) extent to which rubygems need repackaging/rebuilding/mass rebuilding? (rbergeron, 19:58:21)
   2. more features coming to aeolus soon, including a simpler usage/installation scenario (rbergeron, 19:58:39)
   3. snap! is now in fedora http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ruby-sig/2011-November/000693.html (rbergeron, 19:58:54)
   4. can take snapshots of fedora systems on the cloud (rbergeron, 19:59:01)
   5. snapshots contain repos + packages + files outside the package system + service data (rbergeron, 20:01:25)
   6. https://github.com/movitto/snap (mmorsi, 20:01:28)
   7. https://github.com/movitto/snap (rbergeron, 20:01:38)
   
   
7. Open Floor (rbergeron, 20:04:42)
   1. No meeting next week; Online Cloud SIG Party optional :) (rbergeron, 20:09:15)

Action items

1. mmorsi to investigate with ruby-sig/vit about (a) changes to packaging guidelines (b) feature filing (c) extent to which rubygems need repackaging/rebuilding/mass rebuilding?

Action items, by person

1. mmorsi
   1. mmorsi to investigate with ruby-sig/vit about (a) changes to packaging guidelines (b) feature filing (c) extent to which rubygems need repackaging/rebuilding/mass rebuilding?

People present (lines said)

1. rbergeron (140)
2. mmorsi (61)
3. spstarr (36)
4. jforbes (31)
5. mgoldmann_ (26)
6. dgilmore (25)
7. gholms (15)
8. abadger1999 (10)
9. johnmark (6)
10. zodbot (5)
11. kkeithley (5)
12. smooge (2)
13. obino (2)
14. gregdek (2)