rdo_office_hour_-_2017-08-29
LOGS
13:31:05 <chandankumar> #startmeeting RDO Office Hour - 2017-08-29
13:31:05 <zodbot> Meeting started Tue Aug 29 13:31:05 2017 UTC.  The chair is chandankumar. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
13:31:06 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
13:31:06 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'rdo_office_hour_-_2017-08-29'
13:31:07 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Aug 29 13:31:05 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is chandankumar. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
13:31:08 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
13:31:11 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'rdo_office_hour___2017_08_29'
13:31:32 <chandankumar> #topic Roll Call
13:31:52 <chandankumar> rbowen: dmsimard apevec number80 jpena jschlueter|znc office hour time
13:31:58 <number80> o/
13:33:33 <chandankumar> #chair number80
13:33:33 <zodbot> Current chairs: chandankumar number80
13:33:34 <openstack> Current chairs: chandankumar number80
13:34:03 <jpena> o/
13:34:13 <chandankumar> Here is the RDO office hour agenda link : https://review.rdoproject.org/etherpad/p/rdo-office-hour-easyfixes
13:34:19 <chandankumar> #chair jpena
13:34:19 <zodbot> Current chairs: chandankumar jpena number80
13:34:20 <openstack> Current chairs: chandankumar jpena number80
13:34:27 <rbowen> Good morning, all.
13:34:33 <chandankumar> #chair rbowen
13:34:33 <zodbot> Current chairs: chandankumar jpena number80 rbowen
13:34:34 <openstack> Current chairs: chandankumar jpena number80 rbowen
13:35:44 <chandankumar> Here comes the Agenda one by one
13:36:13 <chandankumar> * Easyfix Review cleanup: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/q/status:open+branch:rpm-master+easyfix
13:36:44 <chandankumar> * Cleanup easyfix issues https://github.com/redhat-openstack/easyfix/issues/
13:36:54 <rdogerrit> Javier Peña proposed openstack/watcher-distgit rpm-master: Removed BuildRequires/Requires: python-coverage from .spec  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/8458
13:37:04 <chandankumar> * Answering and closing unanswered ask.openstack.org questions addressed https://ask.openstack.org/en/questions/scope:unanswered/sort:age-desc/page:1/query:rdo/
13:37:23 <chandankumar> * Pike requirements sync pending packages https://review.rdoproject.org/etherpad/p/pike-release-preparation
13:37:37 <chandankumar> * Final copy for https://github.com/redhat-openstack/website/blob/master/source/blog/2017-09-01-rdo-pike-released.html.md (RDO Pike release announcement)
13:37:54 <chandankumar> * Generating a list of contributors for the same
13:38:35 <chandankumar> that's it i think
13:38:43 <chandankumar> Feel free to pick anyone and start working on that
13:39:40 <egonzalez> Hi guys, i added a fix for tacker pike systemd service, its been in review queue for a week, could someone review it? https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/8793/
13:48:00 <chandankumar> mrunge: hello
13:49:47 <chandankumar> mrunge: we need your comment on this issue https://github.com/redhat-openstack/easyfix/issues/11 related to coverage
13:53:11 <rdogerrit> Mike Fedosin proposed rdoinfo master: Remove under-review tag for glare and glareclient  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/9051
13:53:54 <rdogerrit> Merged openstack/murano-agent-distgit rpm-master: Removed BuildRequires/Requires: python-coverage from .spec  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/8467
14:01:04 <dmsimard> jpena: argh, I was certain the weirdo jobs had been moved to rdo cloud once we enabled bfv
14:01:11 <dmsimard> sorry :(
14:04:03 <dmsimard> sshnaidm: no, the web interface was especially locked down after the last few vulnerabilities
14:04:19 <sshnaidm> dmsimard, ok
14:04:21 <dmsimard> sshnaidm: and it's on the way out, we're migrating to full zuul soon. What did you need from the job configuration ?
14:04:29 <jpena> dmsimard: no worries. Those jobs need to run on the rdo-nodepool tenant, right?
14:04:56 <sshnaidm> dmsimard, just a full view of job config, but I'm fine with generated xml
14:05:13 <dmsimard> jpena: yes
14:05:29 <jpena> ack, then I didn't break anything with my change
14:05:42 <dmsimard> sshnaidm: yeah I guess you can run jjb to spit the xml out
14:11:51 <number80> will it fixes the heisen-CI jobs?
14:12:12 <number80> -es
14:14:22 <rdogerrit> Merged config master: Remove qcow image upload from container build job  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/9053
14:15:45 <rdogerrit> Jon Schlueter created openstack/horizon-distgit rpm-master: move python-django-babel to guarded block  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/9054
14:19:25 <ykarel> apevec, can you check and vote on: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/498684/, required for ocata promotion
14:23:01 <chandankumar> If you are willing to review packages feel free to take a look at RDO-PIKE tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427510
14:23:02 <openstack> bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1427510 in distribution "Tracker: Blockers and Review requests for new RDO Pike packages" [Unspecified,New] - Assigned to apevec
14:23:48 <chandankumar> number80: it is waiting on you https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433898
14:23:48 <openstack> bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1433898 in Package Review "New package: Sushy" [Unspecified,Post] - Assigned to mrunge
14:25:22 <number80> chandankumar: they're already published
14:25:37 <number80> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/hguemar/rdo-packager/package/mock-rdo-config/
14:25:55 <number80> I'll refresh the build
14:27:54 <number80> https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/9051/2
14:28:18 <number80> ^btw I think incorrect config sneaked in for glare in rdoinfo
14:28:32 <number80> Make sure to get it fixed before merging
14:28:56 <chandankumar> number80: ah i closed the bz containing the review
14:29:20 <chandankumar> number80: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436029
14:29:21 <openstack> bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1436029 in Package Review "openstack-glare - Unified Artifact Repository" [Unspecified,Closed: currentrelease] - Assigned to amoralej
14:29:22 <number80> Well, it took me two revisions to notice
14:29:54 <number80> (and it was likely silently failing before)
14:30:01 <number80> *not failing
14:30:05 <rdogerrit> Pradeep Kilambi created openstack/gnocchi-distgit newton-rdo: Rebase to 3.0.14  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/9055
14:31:33 <number80> pradk: there's a periodic job doing these rebase, was it failing for some reason? (if it is, we'd like to get it fixed)
14:31:53 <pradk> number80, not fast enough :)
14:32:04 <pradk> whats the frequency of the periodic job?
14:33:04 <pradk> number80, we need this d/s soon.. so i just put a rebase
14:33:12 <number80> ok
14:33:34 <number80> well, it can be too fast, so I'm not surprised it can be too slow :)
14:38:36 <rdogerrit> Mike Fedosin proposed rdoinfo master: Remove under-review tag for glare and glareclient  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/9051
14:39:02 <chandankumar> amuller: number80 I am not sure whom can i ping for this package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421701 please have a look
14:39:03 <openstack> bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1421701 in Package Review "Review Request: openstack-neutron-bgp-dragent" [Medium,Assigned] - Assigned to karlthered
14:39:26 <number80> chandankumar: likely mine
14:39:56 <number80> "Please submit spec file in gerrit after project creation"
14:40:40 <number80> project was not created ...
14:40:53 <rdogerrit> Raildo Mascena de Sousa Filho proposed rdoinfo master: Add myself as maintainer for patrole tempest plugin  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/9031
14:41:01 <chandankumar> bnemec: hello
14:41:18 <chandankumar> bnemec: please send a rdoinfo review to remove under-review tag for this bz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1420931
14:41:19 <openstack> bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1420931 in Package Review "Review Request: tripleo-repos - repo management tool for tripleo" [Medium,Assigned] - Assigned to apevec
14:41:25 <number80> there's no rdoinfo request, so I'll postpone it to queen
14:41:37 <chandankumar> number80: time to create a pike tracker
14:41:44 <number80> apevec: are you taking care of creating the RDO-QUEEN tracker? ^
14:41:53 <chandankumar> s/pike/Queens
14:42:43 <chandankumar> rbowen: i think we can publish a list of packages added in Pike Release from this bz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427510
14:42:44 <openstack> bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1427510 in distribution "Tracker: Blockers and Review requests for new RDO Pike packages" [Unspecified,New] - Assigned to apevec
14:42:45 <bnemec> chandankumar: It hasn't been reviewed yet though.
14:43:29 <chandankumar> bnemec: spec file is imported https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/6882/ as per this review
14:43:31 <rbowen> chandankumar: Thanks! So, each of those tickets is a new package?
14:43:36 <chandankumar> rbowen: yes
14:43:46 <rbowen> ok, I'll get right on that. That could take a while.
14:43:51 <chandankumar> rbowen: crossed one bz having packages available
14:43:55 <chandankumar> in RDO
14:43:57 <number80> ha doc link is broken
14:44:03 <rbowen> Anybody have a suggestion of how to generate a list of all contributors?
14:44:38 * chandankumar is not sure software factory repoexplorer generates list of contributors
14:44:47 <chandankumar> jpena: dmsimard ^^
14:44:55 <number80> jpena, fbo_: do you have link for repoxplorer?
14:45:08 <number80> It does, you can even restrict the time period
14:45:08 <dmsimard> I don't think repoexplorer is enabled for review.rdo
14:45:18 <jpena> no, it's not
14:45:19 <dmsimard> We could enable it
14:45:29 <number80> dmsimard: fbo_ used to have a test deployment
14:45:35 <number80> (with actual data)
14:45:57 <dmsimard> You can see it on the real sf.io here https://softwarefactory-project.io/repoxplorer/
14:46:43 <number80> dmsimard: but not with RDO data :(
14:47:00 <dmsimard> number80: eh, that's the best I can do for now
14:47:21 <dmsimard> number80: we can surely enable repoexplorer, let me look
14:47:31 <chandankumar> dmsimard: thanks :-)
14:48:54 <chandankumar> number80: i think we can merge this review https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/8315/
14:48:59 <chandankumar> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435191
14:49:01 <openstack> bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1435191 in Package Review "New package: osops-tools-monitoring-oschecks" [Unspecified,Assigned] - Assigned to hguemar
14:49:11 <dmsimard> chandankumar, number80: repoexplorer requires elasticsearch
14:49:17 <dmsimard> which is not yet deployed for review.rdo
14:49:20 <dmsimard> so it'll have to wait
14:49:45 <chandankumar> number80: but you need to submit fedora -review on that
14:49:52 <rdogerrit> Merged rdo-infra/rdo-dashboards master: Set Pike GA timer  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/9052
14:51:20 <rdogerrit> Ben Nemec created rdoinfo master: Remove under-review tag from tripleo-repos  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/9056
14:52:03 <number80> chandankumar: for osops-tools-monitoring-oschecks? it's ok
14:53:02 <chandankumar> bnemec: we donot need pike for this https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/9056/ ?
14:53:26 <bnemec> chandankumar: We didn't switch to using it in Pike, so no.
14:53:30 <rdogerrit> trown created config master: Upload images from one periodic ovb job for each release  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/9057
14:53:58 * number80 will be off for few hours and back
14:54:06 <number80> I need my daily sun fix
14:54:25 <trown> sshnaidm: adarazs https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/9057/ gets us image upload back (from one ovb job like upstream)
14:54:26 <bnemec> Actually it should be a branchless project anyway.
14:56:00 <adarazs> trown: cool, looking.
14:56:18 <chandankumar> bnemec: for all branchless project, we maintain a branch for each release, so that we can build the package for the same
14:57:14 <rdogerrit> Mike Fedosin proposed rdoinfo master: Remove under-review tag for glare and glareclient  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/9051
14:58:02 <rdogerrit> Christopher Brown proposed openstack/horizon-distgit rpm-master: Removed BuildRequires/Requires: python-coverage from .spec  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/8464
15:01:53 <chandankumar> #info we have cleanup RDO-Pike package review queue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427510
15:01:54 <openstack> bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1427510 in distribution "Tracker: Blockers and Review requests for new RDO Pike packages" [Unspecified,New] - Assigned to apevec
15:01:59 <chandankumar> \o/
15:02:13 <rdogerrit> Merged openstack/gnocchi-distgit newton-rdo: Rebase to 3.0.14  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/9055
15:03:42 <chandankumar> Next week we will be looking at Newton RDO bugs during office hour.
15:04:09 <chandankumar> #info next week [05-09-2017] Newton RDO Bugs Training
15:07:04 <rbowen> chandankumar: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/RDO-Pike-New-Packages
15:07:27 <rdogerrit> Christopher Brown proposed openstack/horizon-distgit rpm-master: Removed BuildRequires/Requires: python-coverage from .spec  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/8464
15:08:06 <apevec> rbowen, NB bugs in the RDO-<release> trackers might not be new pkg reviews, but most are
15:08:14 <apevec> it could be any release blocking issue
15:08:22 <apevec> or just version update
15:08:50 <apevec> tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=RDO-QUEENS created
15:10:01 <number80> excellent :)
15:11:24 <mfedosin> hello folks! regarding to this: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/9051/4 can I leave pike there?
15:11:42 <chandankumar> ykarel: do you want to include your package reviews here https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/RDO-Pike-New-Packages
15:11:44 <chandankumar> ?
15:12:07 <rbowen> apevec: So, perhaps I could say, the following packages were added or upgraded?
15:12:11 <number80> apevec: glareclient was reviewed in time, glare was delayed due to mistake
15:12:15 <rbowen> Oh. Someone is annotating right now. Awesome.
15:14:52 <rdogerrit> Mike Fedosin proposed rdoinfo master: Remove under-review tag for glare and glareclient  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/9051
15:15:33 <chandankumar> number80: we added shade in this release na?
15:15:38 <apevec> mfedosin, number80 - ok then Pike is fine
15:15:51 <apevec> but ocata probably not
15:16:01 <number80> apevec: I agree, way too late
15:16:08 <number80> chandankumar: yep
15:16:22 <mfedosin> apevec: deal, I'll remove ocata
15:17:07 <chandankumar> jpena: dmsimard EmilienM please have a look if we missed any package we added during Pike cycle https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/RDO-Pike-New-Packages
15:17:44 <rdogerrit> Mike Fedosin proposed rdoinfo master: Remove under-review tag for glare and glareclient  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/9051
15:19:10 <chandankumar> rbowen: number80 can we group the pike package list based on type like: openstack projects, libraries, tempest-plugins, puppet-modules
15:19:13 <chandankumar> ?
15:19:44 <rbowen> That would indeed make it easier to follow than just a long list.
15:22:52 <chandankumar> rbowen: done, if i missed other will update it
15:23:06 <chandankumar> dmsimard: is Ara also packaged in this release na?
15:23:17 <dmsimard> chandankumar: nope.
15:23:26 <dmsimard> chandankumar: maybe in queens.
15:23:33 <chandankumar> dmsimard: ack, thanks :-)
15:23:54 <dmsimard> The fedora packaging is done, just need to tweak it a bit. Unfortunately ARA can't be in EPEL7 so it needs to find a SIG to adopt it :)
15:23:57 <rbowen> chandankumar: The top list is ... Python Libraries?
15:24:40 <chandankumar> pradk: panko is added in Pike release in RDO na?
15:25:01 <rdogerrit> Christopher Brown proposed openstack/horizon-distgit rpm-master: Removed BuildRequires/Requires: python-coverage from .spec  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/8464
15:25:38 <chandankumar> number80: we have packaged some dashboards also na in this release?
15:25:56 <number80> Yeah
15:26:30 <chandankumar> rbowen: i think we can cross verify this on RDO list? may be we have missed some packages
15:27:16 <chandankumar> number80: what about new packages added for tripleo-ui?
15:27:19 <rbowen> Yes, will do. I was waiting for the edits to slow down. Looks like we've got lots of participation here. :-)
15:27:35 <chandankumar> nodejs ones
15:27:37 <jpena> I've added the ones that I found on rdoinfo
15:28:37 <chandankumar> jpich: jrist please add the packages added from tripleo-ui deps side during pike release in RDO https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/RDO-Pike-New-Packages
15:28:55 <jrist> hmm
15:29:06 <jrist> chandankumar: is there a quick/easy way to do that? I'm not sure tbh
15:29:42 <chandankumar> jrist: currently we are greping it from rdoinfo or from this list https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427510
15:29:43 <openstack> bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1427510 in distribution "Tracker: Blockers and Review requests for new RDO Pike packages" [Unspecified,New] - Assigned to apevec
15:29:55 <dmsimard> Was there a blocker bugzilla bug for Pike ?
15:30:03 <dmsimard> ah, yeah that
15:30:10 <number80> RDO-PIKE always :)
15:30:23 <rdogerrit> trown proposed config master: Upload images from one periodic ovb job for each release  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/9057
15:30:37 <dmsimard> I could bring up my repository version tracker thing
15:30:43 <dmsimard> that number80 hated :D
15:30:55 * dmsimard mumbles verwatch mumbles
15:31:17 <number80> I don't hate, just say that it was not fitting all our needs
15:31:20 <chandankumar> #info RDO Pike New package list created https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/RDO-Pike-New-Packages
15:31:24 <chandankumar> and times up
15:31:28 <chandankumar> #endmeeting