atomic_developer_bundle_weekly_meeting
LOGS
15:00:10 <lalatenduM> #startmeeting Atomic Developer Bundle Weekly Meeting
15:00:11 <zodbot> Meeting started Mon Feb 29 15:00:10 2016 UTC.  The chair is lalatenduM. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:11 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
15:00:11 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'atomic_developer_bundle_weekly_meeting'
15:00:12 <ccaf> cdrage, removed /var/lock, all good :)
15:00:25 <lalatenduM> .fas lalatendu
15:00:26 <zodbot> lalatenduM: lalatendu 'Lalatendu Mohanty' <lmohanty@redhat.com>
15:00:34 <ccaf> cdrage, thanks :) rtnpro, suraj_d, it's solved. Removing /var/lock/ helped.
15:00:37 <lalatenduM> Who we have here for the meeting
15:00:40 <lalatenduM> ?
15:00:41 <dharmit> .fas dharmit
15:00:42 <zodbot> dharmit: dharmit 'Dharmit Shah' <shahdharmit@gmail.com> - shahdharmit 'Dharmit Shah' <shahdharmit@gmaill.com>
15:00:53 <preeti> .fas preeti
15:00:53 <zodbot> preeti: preeti 'Preeti Chandrashekar' <preetipagad@gmail.com> - preetish 'c.preetish' <preetishnandhreddy@gmail.com> - tripathp 'Preetish Tripathi' <preetish.tripathi@gmail.com>
15:00:53 <ccaf> .hellomynameis containscafeine
15:00:53 <praveenkumar> .fas kumarpraveen
15:00:56 <zodbot> ccaf: containscafeine 'Shubham Minglani' <shubham@linux.com>
15:00:59 <zodbot> praveenkumar: kumarpraveen '' <kumarpraveen.nitdgp@gmail.com>
15:01:33 <tuxdna> .fas tuxdna
15:01:34 <zodbot> tuxdna: tuxdna '' <tuxdna@gmail.com>
15:02:14 <lalatenduM> praveenkumar: budhram bexelbie ^
15:02:20 <budhram> .fas budhram
15:02:20 <zodbot> budhram: budhram 'Budh Ram Gurung' <bgurung@redhat.com>
15:02:44 <lalatenduM> looks like praveenkumar and bexelbie is away
15:02:52 <praveenkumar> lalatenduM: I already did fas :)
15:03:01 <preeti> Bex I guess is travelling
15:03:03 <lalatenduM> praveenkumar: ohh sorry :)
15:03:17 <lalatenduM> Agenda is at https://titanpad.com/adbmeeting
15:03:25 <dustymabe> .hellomynameis dustymabe
15:03:26 <zodbot> dustymabe: dustymabe 'Dusty Mabe' <dustymabe@redhat.com>
15:03:35 <bamacharan> .fas bamachrn
15:03:37 <suraj_d> .fas surajd
15:03:37 <zodbot> bamacharan: bamachrn '' <bamachrn@gmail.com> - bamacharankundu 'Bamacharan Kundu' <bamacharan.kundu@gmail.com>
15:03:40 <zodbot> suraj_d: surajd 'Suraj Deshmukh' <surajssd009005@gmail.com>
15:04:40 <lalatenduM> #topic sevice-manager plugin release
15:04:47 <lalatenduM> budhram: you want to update us?
15:05:19 <budhram> lalatenduM, I have updated my PR for config + hook approach
15:05:25 <budhram> PR#54
15:05:33 <lalatenduM> budhram: ok
15:05:35 <dustymabe> i just lost connection to the pad
15:05:41 <budhram> also i have tested against adb and cdk boxes
15:05:45 <preeti> yes me too
15:05:55 <lalatenduM> yeah me too
15:06:09 <budhram> same with me
15:06:24 <lalatenduM> budhram: I mean do you want to update us with respect to service-manager plugin release planned today
15:07:03 <lalatenduM> #info service-menager is planned to released today
15:07:17 <budhram> hmm navid told in telegram group ADB that it will be release later tonight
15:07:24 <lalatenduM> version 0.0.3
15:07:31 <lalatenduM> yeah
15:07:38 <budhram> no 0.0.4 i guess
15:07:39 <lalatenduM> here is teh PR for the blog post https://github.com/projectatomic/atomic-site/pull/242
15:08:03 <budhram> ooh sorry missed that
15:08:20 <lalatenduM> budhram: here is teh issue for rlease preparation https://github.com/projectatomic/vagrant-service-manager/issues/74
15:08:50 <budhram> its closed now.
15:08:52 <lalatenduM> we need help from jberkus to merge teh pr https://github.com/projectatomic/atomic-site/pull/242
15:08:58 <lalatenduM> budhram: right
15:09:34 <lalatenduM> Anything else on thsi topic ?
15:09:51 <budhram> navid want you to test against non-supported box
15:09:56 <budhram> before merging it to master
15:10:10 <lalatenduM> budhram: yes, (PR#54)
15:10:32 <budhram> cool
15:10:32 <lalatenduM> budhram: but thsi is not relate dto today's release
15:10:50 <budhram> ok np
15:10:55 <budhram> that's all then.
15:11:02 <lalatenduM> #topic What would be this weeks ADB release version? 1.8.0 or 1.7.1?
15:11:14 <lalatenduM> As this is just a bug fix release
15:11:44 <lalatenduM> we are not introducing anything new here except we can run ADB on openstack instances
15:11:48 <praveenkumar> I vote for 1.7.1 because we don't have any major changes.
15:11:56 <lalatenduM> praveenkumar: +1
15:13:10 <lalatenduM> praveenkumar: however we are adding sshfs to the repo, not default to the box
15:13:37 <praveenkumar> lalatenduM: you mean to adding it to adb repo?
15:13:47 <lalatenduM> praveenkumar: yeah
15:14:05 <dustymabe> lalatenduM: "not default to the box" <-- can you explain
15:14:08 <lalatenduM> praveenkumar: http://mirror.centos.org/centos-7/7/atomic/x86_64/adb/
15:14:57 <lalatenduM> dustymabe: adding to box increases to the size , but we can add default to the box once we are confident that it is stabe
15:15:00 <lalatenduM> stable
15:15:40 <dustymabe> lalatenduM: ok. yeah - we definitely want to have it in the box so people don't have to wait for it to be installed
15:15:42 <lalatenduM> dustymabe: may once you guys settle upstream things and have vagrant plugin is a good state
15:15:51 <lalatenduM> I mean mature state
15:16:01 <dustymabe> so what is the point of putting it in the adb repo?
15:16:10 <dustymabe> if we aren't going to go ahead and put it in the box?
15:17:04 <lalatenduM> dustymabe: the issue is the vagrant-sshfs plugin 's upstream is still not decided
15:17:24 <lalatenduM> s/the/that/
15:17:29 <dustymabe> lalatenduM: ok
15:17:34 <dustymabe> i think that should be worked out soon
15:17:46 <dustymabe> already have a plan to "take over" ownership of the plugin
15:18:02 <dustymabe> The original authoer is on board
15:18:08 <dustymabe> author
15:18:17 <lalatenduM> dustymabe: cool, that great news
15:19:01 <lalatenduM> Looks like we are going for 1.7.1 version
15:19:09 <lalatenduM> anyone have different view
15:19:56 <lalatenduM> Ohh, I missed openshift2Nulecule
15:20:20 <lalatenduM> I am trying to build it too for this release
15:20:32 <lalatenduM> CC tkral
15:20:50 <praveenkumar> lalatenduM: do we have spec file in place for O2N?
15:21:06 <lalatenduM> If I am able to include it in the box by default then it would be 1.8.0
15:21:10 <lalatenduM> praveenkumar: yes
15:21:34 <praveenkumar> lalatenduM: alright
15:21:47 <lalatenduM> ok moving on
15:22:00 <tkral> lalatenduM, praveenkumar, when are you going to include this?
15:22:00 <lalatenduM> #topic adb-utils release
15:22:08 <lalatenduM> tkral: yes, thats the plan
15:22:36 <praveenkumar> tkral: for this weekly build lalatenduM is planning to add it.
15:22:43 <lalatenduM> praveenkumar: you wnat to update for adb-utils?
15:23:13 <lalatenduM> tkral: working on it
15:23:51 <tkral> lalatenduM, praveenkumar, I'll do new release this week, that will change a few things.
15:24:03 <praveenkumar> lalatenduM: I am going to delay adb-utils release because it's broken so I think for this weekly we should use previous build and tomorrow I will again put some effort about finding root cause of service failure.
15:24:30 <lalatenduM> praveenkumar: right
15:24:49 <lalatenduM> praveenkumar: do you want to revert the PR in question and try it?
15:25:12 <praveenkumar> lalatenduM: that what I will check first and see why that PR have issue?
15:25:14 <lalatenduM> tkral: when is the planned date?
15:25:24 <lalatenduM> praveenkumar: ack
15:26:11 <tkral> lalatenduM, probably Thursday or Friday
15:26:37 <lalatenduM> #topic sshfs plugin testing
15:26:41 <lalatenduM> tkral: ack
15:26:48 <lalatenduM> dustymabe: ccaf ^
15:26:58 <dustymabe> lalatenduM: https://github.com/dustymabe/vagrant-sshfs
15:27:11 <dustymabe> please everyone test this out and report back
15:27:23 <dustymabe> you should be able to follow the directions in the README to get it installed
15:27:38 <ccaf> dustymabe, has something changed from vagrant-dusty-sshfs?
15:27:53 <dustymabe> ccaf not really - other than the "dusty" part
15:28:01 <dustymabe> and now the commits are real, with real messages
15:28:06 <dustymabe> and there is documentation
15:28:25 <dustymabe> hopefully this will be the repo that exists from now on and will live as the upstream
15:28:30 <lalatenduM> dustymabe: this look slike a fresh implementation
15:28:37 <dustymabe> lalatenduM: it is
15:28:54 <dustymabe> I wrote it last weekend
15:28:59 <lalatenduM> dustymabe: cool, how are you going to merge thsi with the upstream
15:29:16 <lalatenduM> I mean as it a new code
15:29:19 <dustymabe> lalatenduM: the original author is supportive of the change
15:29:35 <dustymabe> and is willing to cede ownership of the ruby gem
15:29:55 <budhram_> cool
15:30:02 <ccaf> dustymabe, okay. vagrant-dusty-sshfs was working fine with me. I'll test it out once. lalatenduM, dustymabe, maybe we should inform max and hardy about the name change.
15:30:04 <lalatenduM> cool
15:30:19 <lalatenduM> ccaf: dustymabe did on th email
15:30:47 <dustymabe> ccaf: uninstall the vagrant-dusty-sshfs plugin before you install this one
15:30:55 <dustymabe> they try to do the same thing so they would conflict
15:31:05 <ccaf> dustymabe, okay.
15:31:11 <lalatenduM> dustymabe: I have not taken a look yet in to the code , do you want us to
15:31:33 <dustymabe> lalatenduM: please do
15:31:56 <budhram_> i m interested too ;)
15:32:07 <lalatenduM> dustymabe: ok, budhram_ nshaikh bexelbie you guys too should look in to the code
15:32:16 <lalatenduM> ok
15:32:22 <lalatenduM> anything else on this?
15:32:33 <lalatenduM> we are almost over the time
15:33:30 <lalatenduM> ok moving on
15:33:35 <lalatenduM> #open floor
15:33:49 <lalatenduM> do we have any topic?
15:34:15 <lalatenduM> going 1..
15:34:20 <dustymabe> lalatenduM:
15:34:22 <dustymabe> actually
15:34:27 <dustymabe> one sec
15:34:31 <lalatenduM> sure
15:35:20 <dustymabe> has anyone seen this: http://hasura.io/blog/pangaea-point-and-shoot-kubernetes/
15:35:34 <lalatenduM> checking
15:35:42 <dustymabe> if you all don't mind taking a look after the meeting and see what you think
15:35:56 <dustymabe> might be an opportunity for us to get others to collaborate with us and use the ADB
15:35:59 <dustymabe> that is all
15:36:02 <lalatenduM> dustymabe: sure
15:36:09 <lalatenduM> dustymabe: thanks for the pointer
15:36:44 <dustymabe> actually the github page better explains the vagrant part of what they are doing:
15:36:47 <dustymabe> https://github.com/hasura/pangaea
15:36:51 <dustymabe> ok done
15:36:58 <lalatenduM> dustymabe: thanks
15:37:04 <lalatenduM> #endmeeting