MINUTES

#meeting:fedoraproject.org: riscv-sig

TOPIC: init process/agenda (@nirik:matrix.scrye.com, 16:00:26)
TOPIC: status updates (@nirik:matrix.scrye.com, 16:03:41)
TOPIC: F44 status (@kashyapc:fedora.im, 16:05:44)
TOPIC: Kernel status (@kashyapc:fedora.im, 16:23:41)
TOPIC: Flock (@kashyapc:fedora.im, 16:29:33)

Meeting started by @nirik:matrix.scrye.com at 16:00:20 UTC

INFO: David says the debuginfo issue is understood and patch is merged: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/riscv/planning/issues/13. The affected packages is negligibly small (@kashyapc:fedora.im, 16:08:54)
INFO: David says the debugsource info issue is understood and patch is merged: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/riscv/planning/issues/13. The affected packages is negligibly small (@kashyapc:fedora.im, 16:11:23)
IDEA: Potentially document how we do rebuild of F44 in the Forge tracker. (Kashyap is happy to volunteer once he learns the black-magic involved here) (@kashyapc:fedora.im, 16:21:43)

INFO: "Unified" kernels kernels are now renamed to "omni" kernels (@kashyapc:fedora.im, 16:25:07)
LINK: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/forge-riscv-members/riscv64_omni_kernel (@kashyapc:fedora.im, 16:25:23)
IDEA: Andrea suggests to switch existing board-specific kernels to the omni kernel in F44 (@kashyapc:fedora.im, 16:29:07)

INFO: For now don't yet file the formal Fedora RISC-V "community initiative". The hardware situation needs to improve a bit more. (@kashyapc:fedora.im, 16:37:53)
AGREED: Discuss the "path to primary" at Flock informally; more serious discussion can start once hardware is actually here. (@kashyapc:fedora.im, 16:51:42)
LINK: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/M75ZTVONBTS4YJOGMQGHSAQT56ZAQTBG/ (@niknikovsky:fedora.im, 16:52:53)

Meeting ended at 16:52:55 UTC