!info 3. Ticket discussions (remaining time)

!info 4. Open floor (remaining 5-10 minutes)

!info 1. Intros, welcomes, hellos (~5m)

!info 2. Team announcements & news (~5-10m)

!info Fedora Linux 43 released on Tuesday! Expect lots of noise and traffic across Fedora. Note that Infrastructure-related requests might be slower due to the heavy load during the release week.

!info Fedora Linux 43 Release Party: The schedule is shaping up. Reminders are going out to speakers for confirming their presentation slots.

!info AI-Assisted Contributions Policy: It's live and it is officially official.

!info Request for Review of Flock 2026 CFP themes by 2025-11-11: All Mindshare Committee members, please review the proposed 2026 CFP themes for Flock. Feedback is open until Tuesday, 11 November. We will not discuss this in today's meeting agenda due to a packed agenda, but please set some time aside to review and add feedback, if any. If you don't have any, a +1 is also great!

!info The event looks awesome! The Mindshare Committee gives a big hoorah to Cornelius Emase for his efforts! W00t w00t!

!info See some of the following questions asked by Akashdeep Dhar and Gwmngilfen to Mindshare Committee compatriots:

!info **About scope and definition**: What constitutes "recognition" in our context? (Should we focus on public recognition (blog posts, social media), tangible rewards (swag, conference tickets), or a mixture of both?) How do we define and/or evaluate contribution? (What activities should be scoped higher than the others? Technical, community, collaborative, sustained, leadership, chores etc.?)

!info **About process and implementation**: What cadence works best for recognition reviews (either automated or manual) to construct an impact assessment? Frequency of the metrics gathering to weigh action and result balance. How should we connect with other Fedora Project teams to widen our scope of recognition to teams and SIGs that are not necessarily connected directly with but are influenced by Mindshare?

!info **About measurement and metrics**: What metrics should we use to measure the contribution impact (action) and community health (result)? Qualitative (mentorship, accesses etc.) as well as quantitative (commits, issues etc.) How do we introspect the effectiveness of the recognition service itself? With us doing good or bad at what we do can result well or poorly on the other projects/SIGs of the Fedora Project.

!info **About resources and sustainability**: What budget and resources are realistic enough to be used here? Do we reserve a part of the assigned budget, or do we float atop it based on how many interested parties we might get? What would the day-to-day operation entail? Badges and Datanommer are good entry points but what do we do there to expect the maximum benefit in terms of recognition of contributors?

!info See the above questions and please take some time to review them and answer questions you are willing / have context for. Even answering one or two questions is fine if you don't feel like you have answers for all of them!

!info Emma Kidney and Joseph Gayoso are on-board to co-lead the Digital Ambassadorship focus area. They plan to begin by reworking the docs to be more clear and address the questions raised in our previous meeting two weeks ago.

!info #82: Define committee's coordination model with Mindshare Teams. Akashdeep Dhar asked some questions to the wider Committee in this issue. As your time allows, please review and weigh in if you have thoughts!