2025-02-25 17:00:36 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !startmeeting FESCO (2025-02-25)

2025-02-25 17:00:38 <@meetbot:fedora.im> Meeting started at 2025-02-25 17:00:36 UTC
2025-02-25 17:00:38 <@meetbot:fedora.im> The Meeting name is 'FESCO (2025-02-25)'
2025-02-25 17:00:51 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !meetingname fesco
2025-02-25 17:00:51 <@meetbot:fedora.im> The Meeting Name is now fesco
2025-02-25 17:00:56 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> Chairs: @conan_kudo:matrix.org, @ngompa:fedora.im, @nirik:matrix.scrye.com, @humaton:fedora.im, @zbyszek:fedora.im, @sgallagh:fedora.im, @fale:fale.io, @dcantrell:fedora.im, @decathorpe:fedora.im, @salimma:fedora.im
2025-02-25 17:00:59 <@fale:fale.io> !hi
2025-02-25 17:01:01 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !topic Init Process
2025-02-25 17:01:02 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !hi
2025-02-25 17:01:04 <@zodbot:fedora.im> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbyszek)
2025-02-25 17:01:11 <@zodbot:fedora.im> Fabio Alessandro Locati (fale) - he / him / his
2025-02-25 17:01:12 <@fale:fale.io> I'm around but might not be in a continuous way
2025-02-25 17:01:26 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> !hi
2025-02-25 17:01:28 <@zodbot:fedora.im> Neal Gompa (ngompa) - he / him / his
2025-02-25 17:01:37 <@salimma:fedora.im> !hi
2025-02-25 17:01:38 <@zodbot:fedora.im> Michel Lind (salimma) - he / him / his
2025-02-25 17:01:59 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> morning
2025-02-25 17:02:58 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> We have 5, let's start.
2025-02-25 17:03:08 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !fesco 3364
2025-02-25 17:03:08 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !topic #3364 F42 Incomplete Changes Report
2025-02-25 17:03:24 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !fesco 3364
2025-02-25 17:03:25 <@zodbot:fedora.im> ● **Opened:** a week ago by amoloney
2025-02-25 17:03:25 <@zodbot:fedora.im> ● **Last Updated:** an hour ago
2025-02-25 17:03:25 <@zodbot:fedora.im> ● **Assignee:** Not Assigned
2025-02-25 17:03:25 <@zodbot:fedora.im> **fesco #3364** (https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3364):**F42 Incomplete Changes Report**
2025-02-25 17:03:25 <@zodbot:fedora.im> 
2025-02-25 17:03:38 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> Multi-line paste seems to be still (again?) broken :(
2025-02-25 17:03:52 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> I'll go one by one
2025-02-25 17:03:57 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> KTLS implementation for GnuTLS
2025-02-25 17:04:07 <@sgallagh:fedora.im> !hi
2025-02-25 17:04:08 <@zodbot:fedora.im> Stephen Gallagher (sgallagh) - he / him / his
2025-02-25 17:04:09 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> please add any info on that to https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/12181
2025-02-25 17:04:16 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !topic KTLS implementation for GnuTLS
2025-02-25 17:04:35 <@sgallagh:fedora.im> My network connection is a bit flaky today, so sorry if I’m slow to respond
2025-02-25 17:05:26 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> > Status update: The preliminary testing looks good, we need to add a new error message type introduced by the rekey kTLS patch which shouldn't take long.
2025-02-25 17:05:31 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> > The change was in checked into rawhide in time I suppose we are postponing to f43
2025-02-25 17:05:55 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> so that seems easy to resolve... move it to F43?
2025-02-25 17:06:20 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130000
2025-02-25 17:06:29 <@salimma:fedora.im> yeah, is there any urgent need to have this in F42?
2025-02-25 17:06:38 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> +1 to move to F43
2025-02-25 17:06:42 <@salimma:fedora.im> +1
2025-02-25 17:06:54 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> +1
2025-02-25 17:06:56 <@salimma:fedora.im> IIRC Aoife pinged every bug already so if the maintainer does not proactively answer I guess it's not urgent :)
2025-02-25 17:06:57 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> It's unclear to me whats left to do...
2025-02-25 17:07:06 <@salimma:fedora.im> s/maintainer/change owner
2025-02-25 17:07:07 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> but sure if they are ok moving to f43 thats fine with me
2025-02-25 17:07:14 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> I'm impressed they have bug 2,130,000
2025-02-25 17:08:02 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> Fale?
2025-02-25 17:08:08 <@fale:fale.io> +1 on moving for f43
2025-02-25 17:08:38 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !agreed The change is retargeted to F43 (+5, 0, 0)
2025-02-25 17:08:54 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !topic Systemd Security Hardening
2025-02-25 17:09:02 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> > Latest Information: The change owner has not responded to any comments on the tracker bug in ~9 months on current status, and the work does not seem to have moved from the initial x3 PRs. Its looking unlikely that this change is being worked on anymore.
2025-02-25 17:09:15 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> I think we should drop this.
2025-02-25 17:09:30 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> yeah
2025-02-25 17:09:32 <@salimma:fedora.im> I think so too
2025-02-25 17:09:41 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> yep
2025-02-25 17:09:41 <@salimma:fedora.im> this one has been a... misguided change proposal from the beginning I think
2025-02-25 17:10:04 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> +1 to drop the change
2025-02-25 17:10:20 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> +1 to drop
2025-02-25 17:10:26 <@salimma:fedora.im> (the person doing it does not have systemd expertise, most of the people who have to review the PRs don't either)
2025-02-25 17:10:28 <@salimma:fedora.im> +1
2025-02-25 17:11:11 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> @fale?
2025-02-25 17:11:22 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> Fale?
2025-02-25 17:11:44 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> nirik? 
2025-02-25 17:12:02 <@sgallagh:fedora.im> +1 to drop
2025-02-25 17:12:22 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> I'm fine to drop and ask them to resubmit if they want to move forward again. Sure, +1
2025-02-25 17:13:14 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !agreed Change is dropped because of inactivity. Owner is welcome to resubmit if the work is picked up again. (+5, 0, 0)
2025-02-25 17:13:29 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> I tried to incorporate a bit of additional info. I hope that's OK.
2025-02-25 17:13:44 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !topic Unify bin and sbin
2025-02-25 17:13:53 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> This one is mine. I set it to ON_QA now.
2025-02-25 17:14:04 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> There is still some ongoing work, but at this point, I don't think we're going to back this out.
2025-02-25 17:14:15 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> Two bugs open.
2025-02-25 17:14:44 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> Any comments? 
2025-02-25 17:14:46 <@dcantrell:fedora.im> !hi
2025-02-25 17:14:48 <@zodbot:fedora.im> David Cantrell (dcantrell) - he / him / his
2025-02-25 17:14:52 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> If not, I'll move to the next one.
2025-02-25 17:14:56 <@dcantrell:fedora.im> sorry I'm late, was in the lunch line
2025-02-25 17:14:58 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> Hi David.
2025-02-25 17:14:59 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> How many of those pr's are still open? a bunch?
2025-02-25 17:16:06 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> No PRs. There's one bug about sendmail, which might be some confusion, and a general issue about alternatives, which so far has been worked around by not moving those files.
2025-02-25 17:16:38 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> OK, actually there's a pull request from 1.5 months ago…
2025-02-25 17:16:55 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> Ah, no. That was merged.
2025-02-25 17:18:09 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> I think we can revisit next week, but at this point there isn't much to do.
2025-02-25 17:19:02 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> (The sendmail builds with the PR failed, but it seems the logs have been rotated already.)
2025-02-25 17:19:30 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> OK, let's move on.
2025-02-25 17:19:47 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !info This one is mostly implemented. We'll revisit next week.
2025-02-25 17:20:23 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !topic Anaconda as native Wayland application
2025-02-25 17:21:01 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> This is basically done modulo the last thing about X11 desktops
2025-02-25 17:21:06 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> but that has an upstream PR open
2025-02-25 17:21:25 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> !link https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/pull/6202
2025-02-25 17:22:04 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> That PR is from yesterday…
2025-02-25 17:22:24 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> Punt for now, revisit next week?
2025-02-25 17:22:55 <@dcantrell:fedora.im> I'm ok with that
2025-02-25 17:23:23 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> reasonable I guess... the go/no go it next week....
2025-02-25 17:23:32 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> hi  -sorry, lost track of time trying to beat koji into submission 
2025-02-25 17:23:39 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !info This one is mostly implemented. We'll revisit next week.
2025-02-25 17:23:59 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !topic Setuptools 74+
2025-02-25 17:24:14 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> > Latest Information: There are a very small amount of packages still failing to build with this new release of python-etup tools, but the majority of packages have been updated (approx 9/134 left).
2025-02-25 17:24:21 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> That sounds fine.
2025-02-25 17:24:52 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> fine with me
2025-02-25 17:25:22 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !bugzilla 2319698
2025-02-25 17:25:40 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !bug 2319698
2025-02-25 17:25:42 <@zodbot:fedora.im> RHBZ#2319698 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2319698): [python-pyemd]: python-pyemd fails to build with setuptools 74+
2025-02-25 17:26:13 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> It's in ON_QA state.
2025-02-25 17:26:20 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> I think there's nothing to do here.
2025-02-25 17:26:27 <@salimma:fedora.im> yeah, looks fine
2025-02-25 17:26:42 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> yep.
2025-02-25 17:26:51 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !info Change is ON_QA state, one last bug open.
2025-02-25 17:27:15 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> Meh, that phrasing is unclear. But I don't think it matters.
2025-02-25 17:27:24 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !topic Retire zbus v1
2025-02-25 17:27:29 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> Fabio Valentini: since you're here
2025-02-25 17:27:48 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> I'm here!
2025-02-25 17:27:53 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> > Latest Information: There are x3 packages still affected, with PRs still open on each notifying maintainers of this change, and the change is non-blocking for releases with the contingency deadline set to final freeze.
2025-02-25 17:28:50 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> this is now 100% done as far as I can tell: both nmstate and squeekboard are using zbus v5 in fedora 42+ now, and libslirp-helper was retired 
2025-02-25 17:29:08 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> so zbus v1 is retired and nothing needs it any longer
2025-02-25 17:30:11 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !info Change is essentially fully implemented
2025-02-25 17:30:27 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !topic Anaconda WebUI Partitioning
2025-02-25 17:30:36 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> > Latest Information: This change had a community test week in November 2024, and has implemented the solution proposed and approved by FESCo and is/has been working with Fedora QA on integrating their upstream test suite to test the new UI.
2025-02-25 17:30:36 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> 
2025-02-25 17:33:27 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> Does anyone here knows what the latest status is?
2025-02-25 17:33:35 <@dcantrell:fedora.im> I do not
2025-02-25 17:34:35 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> I haven't needed to install F42+ yet and I'm not looking forward to it 😆
2025-02-25 17:35:56 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> I saw there were a bunch of proposed test plans for it...
2025-02-25 17:36:08 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> I think we should get some ack from QA that it's in working state. But I don't think we can figure this out here.
2025-02-25 17:36:19 <@salimma:fedora.im> yeah, we should probably invite QA next time?
2025-02-25 17:36:32 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> when Adam isn't on vacation :)
2025-02-25 17:37:12 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/os-autoinst-distri-fedora/issue/351
2025-02-25 17:37:19 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> and/or ask them to update the ticket. ;)
2025-02-25 17:37:58 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !info We need additional information from Change Owner and QA about the status of this Change. We'll revisit next week.
2025-02-25 17:38:24 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !topic RPMSuportForSystemdSysusers
2025-02-25 17:38:50 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> The part that was planned for F42 is implemented and seems to work fine.
2025-02-25 17:39:38 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> But the scope shifted a bit: I figured out that it's feasible to do pull requests to convert all packages to actually use the new scheme. 40% of ~350 PRs have been merged.
2025-02-25 17:39:46 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> But that part is targeted at F43.
2025-02-25 17:40:36 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> I forgot, did the PRs mention that merging those changes back to <f42 wouldn't work? or does it?
2025-02-25 17:40:42 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> The change is in ON_QA state.
2025-02-25 17:41:04 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> The PRs say that they are compatible with F42+.
2025-02-25 17:41:43 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> I think there's nothing to do here. 
2025-02-25 17:42:25 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !info The Change is implemented in F42 as scoped. Follow-up work continues for F43.
2025-02-25 17:42:41 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> they didn't in any of the PRs I got, so I don't think so
2025-02-25 17:44:23 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> Hmm, OK, indeed. Many of the PRs just redirect to the Change page.
2025-02-25 17:44:53 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> But the Change page is very explicit that this requires new rpm functionality.
2025-02-25 17:45:21 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !topic Golang 1.24
2025-02-25 17:45:39 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> @fale? 
2025-02-25 17:45:47 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> Fale?
2025-02-25 17:46:29 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> it's in both f42/43...
2025-02-25 17:46:58 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> did the FTBFS doom due to new "vet" failures get resolved?
2025-02-25 17:47:30 <@fale:fale.io> [@alexsaezm:fedora.im](https://matrix.to/#/@alexsaezm:fedora.im) is working on isn't afaik
2025-02-25 17:47:37 <@fale:fale.io> *is
2025-02-25 17:49:03 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> So, I would say this is done and just more cleaning up to be done? or do we want to wait and revisit?
2025-02-25 17:49:55 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> Most likely. But it'd be better if the Owner updated the status.
2025-02-25 17:50:31 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !info The change seems to be mostly done. We're waiting for confirmation from the Owner.
2025-02-25 17:50:41 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> I set NEEDINFO on the bug.
2025-02-25 17:50:52 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !topic Tcl/Tk 9.0
2025-02-25 17:51:09 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> > Latest Information: The bodhi update adding compat Tcl/Tk packages and Tcl/Tk 9.0, it also contains builds for packages ported to Tcl/Tk 9.0: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-814b83576d was pushed. There are still a number of open bugs against this change, but the change owner has noted that the majority are build failures which will resolve once they are ported to Tck/Tk 9, or an explicit need for the Tcl/Tk 8.6 compat devel packages to be added to build. The contingency plan is beta freeze, and this change is not release blocking.
2025-02-25 17:51:57 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> sounds good to me 
2025-02-25 17:52:07 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> yep
2025-02-25 17:52:54 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2346758 reports an installation bug
2025-02-25 17:53:00 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> *FTI
2025-02-25 17:53:32 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> But I think it's work is being done.
2025-02-25 17:54:45 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> I think we should gather more info and revisit this next week.
2025-02-25 17:56:04 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> WDYT?
2025-02-25 17:56:52 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> I suppose. I think it's probibly fine and just fixing issues/bugs found...
2025-02-25 17:57:22 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !info We need additional information from Change Owner and QA about the status of this Change. We'll revisit next week.
2025-02-25 17:57:37 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !topic LLVM 20
2025-02-25 17:58:08 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> As usual, this should come in late. I'd ignore it for now.
2025-02-25 17:58:13 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> +1
2025-02-25 17:59:11 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> yep. +1. All systems normal.
2025-02-25 17:59:24 <@fale:fale.io> +1
2025-02-25 17:59:27 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> +1 sigh
2025-02-25 18:00:23 <@dcantrell:fedora.im> I prefer waiting, but I won't hold anything back.  If the masses want +1, I'
2025-02-25 18:00:25 <@dcantrell:fedora.im> ll be a +1
2025-02-25 18:01:03 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !agreed This change is scheduled to happen late, nothing to do not. (+5, 0, 0)
2025-02-25 18:01:14 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !topic Koji uses Red Hat Image Builder locally
2025-02-25 18:01:27 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> Pff, there's a lot of changes yet.
2025-02-25 18:01:40 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> Do we want to go through all of them today?
2025-02-25 18:02:28 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> well... next thursday is the beta go/nogo... so hopefully we will have a beta rc early next week... so next tuesday is kinda late to run a contengincy plan on something that requires that at beta.
2025-02-25 18:02:39 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> I guess we have to go through them all
2025-02-25 18:02:46 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> are there any in that list that are likely to need that?
2025-02-25 18:02:48 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> these kind of meetings are always long, no?
2025-02-25 18:03:00 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> OK, I'll try to go faster.
2025-02-25 18:03:05 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> Returning to the change
2025-02-25 18:03:15 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> > Latest Information: Latest comment on the bz tracker indicates infra support was needed to enable this change. Status is unknown right now (by me, others might know more). This does not seem to be release blocking.
2025-02-25 18:03:23 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> nirik do you have more info?
2025-02-25 18:04:04 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> I was on pto... so not really. I do know they were trying to get things working with new mock chroot and having issues... but I am not sure the state of the plugin.
2025-02-25 18:04:58 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> So, I would say punt this one and get more info from change owners.
2025-02-25 18:05:08 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> It should be pretty transparent to switch it in.
2025-02-25 18:05:18 <@dcantrell:fedora.im> I second punting
2025-02-25 18:05:30 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> OK.
2025-02-25 18:05:53 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !info We need more information from the Change Owner. We'll revisit next week.
2025-02-25 18:06:43 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> I added NEEDINFO.
2025-02-25 18:06:54 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> OK, now self-contained.
2025-02-25 18:07:04 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !topic Reduce the amount of "dontaudit" rules pertaining to unlabeled_t
2025-02-25 18:07:45 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> no idea where this one is. ;(
2025-02-25 18:08:40 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> No idea. I don't even know where to check.
2025-02-25 18:09:08 <@salimma:fedora.im> this one sounds like something that we can keep punting until it's done?
2025-02-25 18:09:31 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> yeah, seems like it would be gradual. But it does need to reach some kind of milestone or something I would hope
2025-02-25 18:09:33 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> I didn't even know this was a change
2025-02-25 18:09:43 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> which is kind of bad 😅
2025-02-25 18:09:44 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !info We need info from the Owners.
2025-02-25 18:11:08 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !topic Enable Drm Panic
2025-02-25 18:13:04 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> We have `CONFIG_DRM_PANIC=y` in kernel config…
2025-02-25 18:13:09 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> This I think is done? (although it was anoying to me the other day)
2025-02-25 18:13:42 <@dcantrell:fedora.im> you also need FONT_TER16x32
2025-02-25 18:13:45 <@dcantrell:fedora.im> I think
2025-02-25 18:13:50 <@dcantrell:fedora.im> for HiDPI displays
2025-02-25 18:14:16 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> yeah, easy to fix up, but the feature is essentially enabled
2025-02-25 18:14:30 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !info The kernel changes seem to be done. The feature seems to be implemented.
2025-02-25 18:14:56 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> none of the recent rawhide kernels boot for me. They fail to find the rootfs. It pops up a nice drmpanic with a tux and the last line of the messages. :( Had to pass some things to get a qrcode or kmsg
2025-02-25 18:15:28 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> anyhow, it's implemented. ;)
2025-02-25 18:15:31 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> next!
2025-02-25 18:15:40 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> I wonder if we can have a fedora logo instead of tux
2025-02-25 18:15:40 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !topic Integrate FEX in Fedora Linux
2025-02-25 18:15:42 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> but otherwise yay
2025-02-25 18:15:53 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> The FEX change is done
2025-02-25 18:16:02 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> so it can be set to ON_QA
2025-02-25 18:16:10 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !info This Change is done.
2025-02-25 18:16:19 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> It's yours, so please update the status.
2025-02-25 18:16:37 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !topic Deprecate gtk3-rs
2025-02-25 18:16:57 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> We seem to have an update in bodhi, so it seems to be done.
2025-02-25 18:17:07 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !link https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-144124824e
2025-02-25 18:17:15 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> it's done 
2025-02-25 18:17:23 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !info This change is done.
2025-02-25 18:17:27 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> it should already be ON_QA?
2025-02-25 18:17:31 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !topic Improve edk2 security
2025-02-25 18:17:47 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> > Latest Information: The bz tracker was only added to this change on 17-Feb. I have reached out to the change owner via email to get a status update for the change, however it is not release blocking with no contingency plan or deadline associated with the change, nor is it release-blocking.
2025-02-25 18:18:16 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> punt
2025-02-25 18:18:24 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> poke and punt
2025-02-25 18:18:34 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> > Implemented in edk2-20241117-14.fc{42,43}
2025-02-25 18:18:36 <@dcantrell:fedora.im> peek, poke, then punt
2025-02-25 18:18:43 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> So I think this actually done.
2025-02-25 18:19:06 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !info This seems to be implemented in edk2 now.
2025-02-25 18:19:15 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !info Idris 2
2025-02-25 18:19:36 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> I'm the reviewer on the package review request, and it's 90% ready but stalled.
2025-02-25 18:20:10 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> This can go in at any time, since it's new stuff, so I'd punt for now.
2025-02-25 18:20:58 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !info The package is under review. It can go in at any time, so we don't need to make any decisions yet.
2025-02-25 18:21:06 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !topic IBus 1.5.32
2025-02-25 18:21:47 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> > Fixed In Version: ibus-1.5.32~beta2-3.fc42
2025-02-25 18:21:59 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> OK, so this seems fine. Change is in ON_QA state.
2025-02-25 18:22:22 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !info This change seems to be done in latest builds of ibus.
2025-02-25 18:22:36 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !info ibus-libpinyin 1.16
2025-02-25 18:22:41 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !topic ibus-libpinyin 1.16
2025-02-25 18:24:09 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> ibus-libpinyin-1.16.0-1.fc42 was built…
2025-02-25 18:24:17 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> So I think this is done.
2025-02-25 18:24:27 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !info ibus-libpinyin-1.16.0-1.fc42 was built
2025-02-25 18:24:47 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !topic Replace cockpit-navigator with cockpit-files
2025-02-25 18:25:44 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> `sudo dnf install cockpit-navigator` gives me `cockpit-files` on F42, so I think this is done.
2025-02-25 18:25:54 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !info This change seems to be done.
2025-02-25 18:25:56 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> +1 yeah
2025-02-25 18:26:16 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !topic Move Fedora CoreOS updates from OSTree to OCI
2025-02-25 18:26:47 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> Not sure the status here...
2025-02-25 18:26:56 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> I have no idea what's going on there
2025-02-25 18:27:51 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> I added NEEDINFO.
2025-02-25 18:28:09 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !info We need an update about status from Change Owners. We'll revisit next week.
2025-02-25 18:28:20 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !topic Haskell GHC 9.8 and Stackage 23
2025-02-25 18:28:57 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> I don't see the new ghc being built…
2025-02-25 18:30:32 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> WDYT?
2025-02-25 18:31:20 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> ghc9.8-9.8.4-14.fc42 was built 18/1/2025.
2025-02-25 18:31:22 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> it's there: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc9.8
2025-02-25 18:31:41 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> Yeah, but the plan was to update ghc to be the main version.
2025-02-25 18:32:06 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> yeah, looks like that part hasn't happend yet
2025-02-25 18:32:29 <@dcantrell:fedora.im> a lot of Haskell modules are catching up to 9.8, so that may be part of the delay
2025-02-25 18:32:44 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> Punt?
2025-02-25 18:33:06 <@dcantrell:fedora.im> find with me
2025-02-25 18:33:19 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !info We need an update about status from Change Owner. We'll revisit next week.
2025-02-25 18:34:00 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !topic Optimized Binaries for the AMD64 / x86_64 Architecture (v2)
2025-02-25 18:34:20 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> This one is mine. It's stalled.
2025-02-25 18:34:29 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !Info Retarget to F43.
2025-02-25 18:34:38 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !topic Retire Zezere Provisioning Server (IoT)
2025-02-25 18:34:58 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> No idea about this one.
2025-02-25 18:35:28 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> No idea either.
2025-02-25 18:38:30 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> The bug is misassigned.
2025-02-25 18:38:45 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> I tried to fix it, but the bugzilla email address doesn't work.
2025-02-25 18:38:57 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> *the email address doesn't work in bugzilla.
2025-02-25 18:39:02 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> Sorry, it's been a long meeting.
2025-02-25 18:39:54 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> OK, fixed.
2025-02-25 18:40:12 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !info We need an update about status from Change Owner. We'll revisit next week.
2025-02-25 18:40:38 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !topic Intel SGX Software Stack
2025-02-25 18:40:46 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> > Only outstanding feature work is to get the systemd presets defined to start on boot, so should be ON_QA soon. See linked BZ for fedora-release.
2025-02-25 18:40:53 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !info This seems fine.
2025-02-25 18:41:18 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !topic Add bpfman to Fedora
2025-02-25 18:41:28 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> > Latest Information: A build has been pushed to the F42 stable repo - FEDORA-2024-5814c2fd6d (bpfman-0.5.4-2.fc42).
2025-02-25 18:41:31 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> So… good?
2025-02-25 18:41:56 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> seems like...
2025-02-25 18:42:13 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> From the change page Scope: Other developers: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/ebpf-sig/bpfman-next/ migrate these packages from copr to Fedora alongside proposal owners
2025-02-25 18:43:09 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> But I don't know what those "other packages" are.
2025-02-25 18:43:47 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !info The bpfman package was built for F42. The main part of this change is done.
2025-02-25 18:43:56 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> OK, so that's it.
2025-02-25 18:44:11 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !topic Next week's chair
2025-02-25 18:44:43 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> I think jednorozec said that he can do next week.
2025-02-25 18:45:07 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !action jednorozec will chair the next meeting.
2025-02-25 18:45:14 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !topic Open Floor
2025-02-25 18:45:45 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> If nothing, I'll close in a minute.
2025-02-25 18:46:39 <@zbyszek:fedora.im> !endmeeting