Meeting started at 2024-11-25 07:00:35 UTC

The Meeting name is 'i18n'

The Meeting Name is now i18n

Hi

hi

Hi

Hi

Hi all

Let's start today's meeting

Does anyone know what need to be done for this ticket?

I think solution is already given in https://pagure.io/i18n/issue/186#comment-916074

Should we close this ticket then?

no replies so I consider we all agree to close this ticket. Thank you.

let's move to next ticket

Tomorrow is EOL for Fedora 39

we still have 24 bugs open

hopefully remaining bug assignee will get time to triage those bugs

I will open a upstream gnome issue for CJK...

I was reading the CJK post ;-)

anything to discuss for this ticket?

tagoh: not sure which would be the best component?

Jens Petersen: gnome-control-center if you want to have some UI for that?

Sure but it would need something in gnome-settings-daemon?

it may depends. Given that we want to have a sort of secondary language support on desktop, some update may be needed in gtk level first maybe.

Indeed

What is remaining for this ticket?

if its completed already, can we close this ticket?

As I noted gating is not enabled i think?

It might be good to have more tests too

fujiwara: What are your plans for this ticket?

fujiwara: what do you think?

Sorry, it maybe postponed.

Okay Thanks

We added ibus-cangie to the recommends of langpacks-zh_HK

I see the related bug is already closed and implementation is also completed

can we close this pagure ticket then?

Perhaps we can wait - not sure if they want to pursue default further

Yes good enough for the moment.

We can close the ticket.

I confused you recommended ibus-cangjie too right?

Ah there are 2 engines I didn't know that

okay

Yes, quick and cangjie.

Thanks. Let's move to next ticket

probably this need to be worked by QE people?

Likely

Okay then this need to be discussed in next meeting as QE are not available today

Let's move to next ticket

Hmm actually reading https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/blob/master/f/notes/metrics-to-collect.md - it seems potentially already covered or in possible scope at least, though perhaps we could help out or contribute to the effort indirectly at least

I hadn't seen that earlier

(linked from the Change page)

Okay

anything else to discuss for this ticket?

Arguably we could close it and wait for the work/implementation to start, if we are closing all the things

Okay let's close it as I don't see any action items for that ticket yet.

Sounds good - I thought we should discuss to have to added to the scope but since it is already there I agree

Sounds good - I thought we should discuss to have it added to the scope but since it is already there I agree

Moving to next topic

As we are into Fedora Linux 42 development cycle initial period, the upcoming milestones are related to Change proposal submissions

If anyone is planning to submit any Change proposal please do so accordingly before its deadline

Anything to discuss for this topic?

If nothing then let's move to next topic

anyone got any topic to discuss here?

If nothing then let's stop here.

Thank you for joining this meeting