Meeting started at 2026-06-24 15:30:57 UTC

The Meeting name is 'fedora_coreos_meeting'

!hi

Angel Cervera Roldan: Angel Cervera Roldan (acervera)

!hi

apiaseck: Adam Piasecki (c4rt0) - he / him / his

!hi

!hi

Hristo Marinov: Hristo Marinov (hricky) - he / him / his

dustymabe: Dusty Mabe (dustymabe) - he / him / his

!hi

marmijo: Michael Armijo (marmijo)

Hello everyone! Welcome 👋

!hi

Cade: Cade Jacobson (cadejacobson)

!hi

jbtrystram: Jean-Baptiste Trystram (jbtrystram) - he / him / his

!hi

No Fedora Accounts users have the @peytonrobertson:matrix.org Matrix Account defined

!hi

spresti: Steven Presti (spresti)

Doesnt seem to have any actions items, so let's go to our next topic that is taking a look onFedora 45 schedule. :)

Doesnt seem to have any actions items, so let's go to our next topic that is taking a look on Fedora 45 schedule. :)

Actually, I took a look on our meeting logs from last week and there is a action item for marmijo and its related to Fedora 45.

Any news about it?

> marmijo: Add a comment to issue fedora-coreos-tracker#2006 to ask spresti if they are willing to lead the F45 change request effort.

I just did that this morning, I was a little late in getting to it. https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/2006#issuecomment-4790664762

Thank you for working on that marmijo :)

No Fedora Accounts users have the @ydesouza:matrix.org Matrix Account defined

I have def been working on this.

spresti: nice!

There are quite a few moving parts with something like this. The first part is of course the actual pivot. https://github.com/coreos/ignition/pull/2235

acervera has already given cookies to marmijo during the F44 timeframe

Today is also the first change checkpoint for F45. We have some tasks in our rebase checklist to untag old packages around this date. I'll get started on those tasks.

Let us know if you need any help with that, marmijo

if anyone wants to learn the process feel free to tag along with marmijo on this!

awesome marmijo - thanks!

!hi

cjp256: Chris Patterson (cjp256)

spresti: nice.. is that PR something you'd like a review on (or maybe at least a local build + test on?)

The other topic that we have in our tracker is also about the Fedora 45 changes

dustymabe, yeah a review would be nice, I created a gist that allows us to re-create the PR to highlight the steps as its a lot of commits, you can read the thread of thoughts here https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/2006#issuecomment-4674584893

I'm really excited about this!

Additionally as part of that convo bin reduction has a pr, i know you wanted someone else to take it but its basically done

https://github.com/coreos/ignition/pull/2238

wow. really great work spresti

Nice! Thank you a lot!

Any other inputs about Fedora 45?

I have one.

I know Bipin has been working on this and it's getting closer

wondering if we should file a change request for https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1582 (or maybe we are already)?

Timothée Ravier's last comment on that issue says he doesn't think this will require a change request. It would definitely encourage us to land it quicker if we do file one though

marmijo: absolutely. I don't think we *need* a change request here but...

for at least half of change requests honestly it's more of a marketing/FYI play.

I think it would be nice to promote this change so other people know about it and could potentially use it

re-scoping: we don't need a change request (it's not required), but I think it could be useful for us to make one.

I agree with that!

I think it's a good idea too!

Just like previous rebases, I'll leave the `meeting` label on the current topic's issue until we're closer to GA of 45. There are no new change requests to review today, but I'll keep running the script each week so we can discuss them as they come through.

Thank you, marmijo . Is a good way to keep everyone informed weekly.

I'll add a comment to the ignition RPM issue with the points about the change request need versus benefit

I did open a new issue for the "Relocate RPM Repository Configs to /usr" change for us to investigate it.

Thanks marmijo

Well, I guess that's it we have to discuss today if there is any other insight about Fedora 45 we can go to open floor.

Well, I guess that's it we have to discuss today if there is no other insight about Fedora 45 we can go to open floor.

For this PR (https://github.com/coreos/afterburn/pull/1264), I think we've gotten the ordering figured out now, thank you to spresti , Cade , cjp256

I know we were hoping to get a few other reviews on it though if anyone has the time!

I know we were hoping to get a few other reviews on it though if anyone has the time!

For this PR (https://github.com/coreos/afterburn/pull/1264), I think we've gotten the ordering figured out now, thank you to spresti , Cade , cjp256!

Peyton Robertson: I did see that! thank you for all your hard work and everyone else involved. I should be able to do a final pass today on the review from my perspective. I would love other eyes on it as well just in case.

Thanks Peyton Robertson I can review the PR as well :)

No Fedora Accounts users have the @peytonrobertson:matrix.org Matrix Account defined

cadejacobson has already given cookies to spresti during the F44 timeframe

not sure if Timothée Ravier was planning to take a look. Thanks Yasmin de Souza !

Any other topics for today? We still have time for more discussions :)

Peyton Robertson: after we merge, what are the next steps needed from us? I assume some releases of both ignition / afterburn?

jbtrystram: how was Flock? :)

It was good to meet people !

Yes! I think we'll need to release Ignition with the writing to /etc and /run directories change (https://github.com/coreos/ignition/pull/2221) and then an afterburn release for the config logic.

+1, okay I think we should be able to start prioritizing that in the coming sprint. Not sure who will take it but we will see about getting that done.

We are mid through current sprint fyi. so 2 to 3 weeks likely assuming no blockers.

apiaseck, I'm not sure how I missed this for two months, but thank you for adding your name to the FCOS release rotation! Welcome back!!

apiaseck++

dustymabe gave a cookie to c4rt0. They now have 5 cookies, 1 of which were obtained in the Fedora 44 release cycle

Thanks apiaseck ! Welcome back :)

Well, is there any other information that anyone wants to share in open floor? Any topics, kudos, discussions?

I just need a reminder about the deadline

yes, I'm back from the hellfest metal festival and I'm about to create change proposal for oom-kill service and default zram for CoreOS

The schedule is here:

Today we have the deadline for infrastructure changes. The other ones are 2026-06-30 :)

thanks 🙂 that's nice

NP!

Guess we can finish this meeting. Feel free to start any discussions in our channel :)

Thank you all for the participating!