fedora-coreos-meeting
LOGS
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:30:42
!startmeeting fedora_coreos_meeting
<@meetbot:fedora.im>
15:30:45
Meeting started at 2025-07-23 15:30:42 UTC
<@meetbot:fedora.im>
15:30:45
The Meeting name is 'fedora_coreos_meeting'
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:30:47
!topic roll call
<@marmijo:fedora.im>
15:31:42
!hi
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
15:31:43
Michael Armijo (marmijo)
<@aaradhak:matrix.org>
15:31:49
!hi aaradhak
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
15:31:51
Aashish Radhakrishnan (aaradhak)
<@hricky:fedora.im>
15:32:01
!hi
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
15:32:02
Hristo Marinov (hricky) - he / him / his
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:33:10
!hi
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
15:33:12
Timothée Ravier (siosm) - he / him / his
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:35:55
Looks like we don't have that many folks today
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:36:07
!topic Action items from last meeting
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:36:50
From https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/fedora-coreos-community-meeting-minutes-2025-07-16/160372, we have one action item.
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:36:56
marmijo to investigate the use of ostree and rpm-ostree to determine their relevance and integration as part of Package-specific RPM Macros For Build Flags changes.
<@marmijo:fedora.im>
15:37:48
<@marmijo:fedora.im>
15:38:15
I spent some time looking into this last week and I don't believe the change will affect FCOS. The change introduces new flags to some macros used to set/override default compiler flags for C, C++, and Fortran packages. I checked ostree, rpm-ostree, and coreos-installer and, in those specific packages, we aren't using any of the macros mentioned in the change: `%{build_cflags}`, `%{build_cxxflags}`, `%{build_fflags}`, and `%{build_ldflags}`. We are using Rust flags and the default RPM build environment flags like `%configure` and `%make_build`, not C/C++, Fortran flags, so this change shouldn't affect our packages. If we were to introduce specific C/C++ compiler flags in our packages, we should be aware of the new flags for those macros.
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:39:04
Great! Thanks! Do you mind copy/pasting that investigation in the ticket? Thanks
<@marmijo:fedora.im>
15:39:13
absolutely. I'll do that now
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:39:27
Let's move on
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:39:36
!topic Review Fedora 43 Release Schedule
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:39:45
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:40:12
We just crossed the Change Checkpoint: Proposal submission deadline (Self Contained Changes)
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:40:45
RPMs are going to be mass rebuilt soon. We should look out for failures.
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:40:55
!info RPMs are going to be mass rebuilt soon. We should look out for failures
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:41:19
!info RPMs are going to be mass rebuilt soon. We should look out for failures
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:42:06
I think that's it?
<@aaradhak:matrix.org>
15:42:35
Yes I think so
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:42:40
!topic tracker: Fedora 43 changes considerations
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:42:51
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:43:25
So, 120 has been investigated.
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:43:37
I see 208 as new
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:43:55
!info 208. Disablement of STI tests
<@jdoss:beeper.com>
15:43:57
.hi
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:44:00
<@jdoss:beeper.com>
15:44:36
!hi
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
15:44:38
Joe Doss (jdoss)
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:45:26
Looks like ignition (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpm-ostree/blob/rawhide/f/tests) and rpm-ostree (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ignition/blob/rawhide/f/tests) will be impacted
<@marmijo:fedora.im>
15:46:51
We should create a separate tracker issue for this one. Are there any other packages that will be affected?
<@aaradhak:matrix.org>
15:46:53
do we have gating tests only for these two packages?
<@aaradhak:matrix.org>
15:47:04
do we have gating tests only for these two packages in fedora?
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:47:40
From emails in my inbox and a quick local check, so far I think those are the only ones impacted
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:47:51
creating an issue to track this would be great
<@aaradhak:matrix.org>
15:48:11
yes +1
<@aaradhak:matrix.org>
15:48:36
I can create a tracker issue
<@marmijo:fedora.im>
15:48:56
Thanks!
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:49:06
great
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:49:16
I don't think we rely on those tests for gating
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:49:25
it's only for PRs if I'm not mistaken?
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:49:39
but I could be wrong here
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:50:27
We also have a lot of testing in other places so it's unlikely to impact us even if we don't get to it in time. I don't even know where to look for those test results
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:51:29
alright, next one
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:51:41
!info Dovecot 2.4
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:51:48
easy, we don't ship this in FCOS
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:52:06
!info 217. Switch the distribution default version of MySQL from MySQL 8.0 to MySQL 8.4
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:52:12
same thing, we don't ship that
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:52:31
!info 222. Modular GnuPG packaging
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:52:38
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:55:08
Looks like we currently include the "all in" gnupg2 package
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:56:15
it's pulled in manifests/file-transfer.yaml
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:56:43
so we probably want to keep at least gnupg2-verify?
<@aaradhak:matrix.org>
15:58:14
That is something used to verify the fedora images when we download I believe.
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:59:08
ostree uses to verify the commit signatures but that's via the library if I'm not mistaken
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:59:41
/usr/bin/gpgv2
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:59:45
ah no, nevermind
<@siosm:matrix.org>
15:59:56
rpm -q --requires ostree| grep gpg
<@aaradhak:matrix.org>
16:00:35
I remember using gpg for verifications like these
<@aaradhak:matrix.org>
16:00:35
`gpg --verify fedora-coreos-${RELEASE}-qemu.x86_64.qcow2.xz.sig`
<@aaradhak:matrix.org>
16:00:35
<@siosm:matrix.org>
16:00:48
indeed
<@siosm:matrix.org>
16:01:34
hum, coreos-installer does not depend on it
<@siosm:matrix.org>
16:01:49
ah, it depends on gnupg directly
<@siosm:matrix.org>
16:02:03
ok, so we do need to do small changes for this
<@jbtrystram:matrix.org>
16:03:01
!hi
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
16:03:04
Jean-Baptiste Trystram (jbtrystram) - he / him / his
<@siosm:matrix.org>
16:03:51
OK, should not be too difficult, we can make an issue to track it
<@siosm:matrix.org>
16:04:02
!info 223 Confidential Virtualization Host for Intel TDX
<@siosm:matrix.org>
16:04:10
<@siosm:matrix.org>
16:05:01
Looks like this should not require an actions from us
<@siosm:matrix.org>
16:06:18
That's it and there are no other tickets marked for discussion, so I'll move to open floor
<@siosm:matrix.org>
16:06:37
!topic Open Floor
<@aaradhak:matrix.org>
16:07:56
<@aaradhak:matrix.org>
16:07:56
https://fedoraproject.org/en/coreos/download?stream=stable
<@aaradhak:matrix.org>
16:07:56
Just wanted to inform that we had a Fedora release for this week -
<@aaradhak:matrix.org>
16:08:13
https://fedoraproject.org/en/coreos/download?stream=stable
<@aaradhak:matrix.org>
16:08:13
Just wanted to inform that we had a Fedora coreos release for this week -
<@aaradhak:matrix.org>
16:08:13
<@jdoss:beeper.com>
16:08:18
Sorry for the interruption, I have to bounce to another meeting but I plan on getting the Proxmox docs sorted out this week.
<@aaradhak:matrix.org>
16:08:29
https://fedoraproject.org/en/coreos/download?stream=stable
<@aaradhak:matrix.org>
16:08:29
Just wanted to inform that we had a Fedora coreos release this week -
<@aaradhak:matrix.org>
16:08:29
<@marmijo:fedora.im>
16:08:44
Thanks jdoss!
<@aaradhak:matrix.org>
16:11:38
Just wanted to inform that we had a Fedora CoreOS release this week -
<@aaradhak:matrix.org>
16:11:38
<@aaradhak:matrix.org>
16:11:38
https://fedoraproject.org/en/coreos/download?stream=stable
<@siosm:matrix.org>
16:12:47
hum, apparently https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1967 should have been shipped with this release but I don't see the artifacts on the download website
<@siosm:matrix.org>
16:12:56
looking at the stream json to confirm
<@siosm:matrix.org>
16:14:39
it's in the json stream so maybe we did not update the website?
<@aaradhak:matrix.org>
16:15:13
Strange, I did see the oracle cloud in the json of rollout PR
<@marmijo:fedora.im>
16:15:39
Yeah its not showing on the FCOS release browser either, but it's in the meta.json of the builds
<@siosm:matrix.org>
16:16:16
hum, it's there: https://gitlab.com/fedora/websites-apps/fedora-websites/fedora-websites-3.0/-/merge_requests/1089/diffs
<@siosm:matrix.org>
16:19:02
ok, we'll figure that out later :)
<@siosm:matrix.org>
16:19:22
Closing this meeting in 2 minutes unless there is something else to discuss?
<@jbtrystram:matrix.org>
16:19:47
the release browser is up do date but probably needs to be re-deployed : https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-browser/commit/8f63e06e84918a8b881297e0c6554304cb5ff13d
<@siosm:matrix.org>
16:21:01
OK, we'll need someone with access to do that. Not sure who has
<@siosm:matrix.org>
16:21:26
Let's close this meeting since there are no other topics :)
<@siosm:matrix.org>
16:21:34
!endmeeting