2024-11-27 16:32:28 <@siosm:matrix.org> !startmeeting fedora_coreos_meeting
2024-11-27 16:32:31 <@meetbot:fedora.im> Meeting started at 2024-11-27 16:32:28 UTC
2024-11-27 16:32:31 <@meetbot:fedora.im> The Meeting name is 'fedora_coreos_meeting'
2024-11-27 16:32:46 <@siosm:matrix.org> !topic roll call
2024-11-27 16:33:13 <@gurssing:matrix.org> !hi gursewak
2024-11-27 16:33:15 <@zodbot:fedora.im> Gursewak Singh (gursewak)
2024-11-27 16:33:31 <@jlebon:fedora.im> !hi
2024-11-27 16:33:32 <@zodbot:fedora.im> None (jlebon)
2024-11-27 16:33:34 <@ravanelli:matrix.org> !hi ravanelli
2024-11-27 16:33:35 <@zodbot:fedora.im> Renata Ravanelli (ravanelli)
2024-11-27 16:33:42 <@marmijo:fedora.im> !hi
2024-11-27 16:33:43 <@zodbot:fedora.im> Michael Armijo (marmijo)
2024-11-27 16:33:48 <@siosm:matrix.org> !hi
2024-11-27 16:33:50 <@zodbot:fedora.im> Timothée Ravier (siosm) - he / him / his
2024-11-27 16:34:11 <@hricky:fedora.im> !hi
2024-11-27 16:34:11 <@zodbot:fedora.im> Hristo Marinov (hricky) - he / him / his
2024-11-27 16:34:40 <@aaradhak:matrix.org> !hi aaradhak
2024-11-27 16:34:42 <@zodbot:fedora.im> Aashish Radhakrishnan (aaradhak)
2024-11-27 16:38:55 <@siosm:matrix.org> Let's start
2024-11-27 16:39:10 <@siosm:matrix.org> !topic Action items from last meeting
2024-11-27 16:39:25 <@siosm:matrix.org> !link https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/fedora-coreos-community-meeting-minutes-2024-11-20/137979
2024-11-27 16:39:48 <@siosm:matrix.org> No action items from the last meeting
2024-11-27 16:40:10 <@siosm:matrix.org> Any topic we should discuss first?
2024-11-27 16:41:05 <@siosm:matrix.org> I vaguely remember that we should talk about the release schedule for the releases during the end of the year break
2024-11-27 16:41:27 <@siosm:matrix.org> But I don't see an issue for that
2024-11-27 16:42:21 <@marmijo:fedora.im> I brought that up in the CoreOS channel a few days ago. We can probably wait until next week to discuss when more people are here
2024-11-27 16:42:52 <@siosm:matrix.org> 👍️ makes sense
2024-11-27 16:43:05 <@siosm:matrix.org> Can you file an issue so that we don't forget it?
2024-11-27 16:43:15 <@marmijo:fedora.im> Will do!
2024-11-27 16:43:42 <@siosm:matrix.org> Let's go to our currently listed meeting items
2024-11-27 16:43:51 <@siosm:matrix.org> !topic Configure kdump to exclude some coreos modules in generated kdump initramfs
2024-11-27 16:43:56 <@siosm:matrix.org> !link https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1832
2024-11-27 16:45:21 <@siosm:matrix.org> ah, it looks like https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1837 could be a solution for this one
2024-11-27 16:46:05 <@siosm:matrix.org> So, the general use case here is that when using kdump, we don't need most of the coreos dracut modules for the initramfs generated just for kdump usage
2024-11-27 16:46:13 <@siosm:matrix.org> it does not need ignition, etc.
2024-11-27 16:47:06 <@siosm:matrix.org> keeping those modules out as value as it makes the initramfs smaller and thus the amount of memory that has to be reserved for kdump on a node smaller and thus makes using kdump more attractive
2024-11-27 16:47:41 <@siosm:matrix.org> (as it takes less memory away from workloads/containers)
2024-11-27 16:48:58 <@siosm:matrix.org> related to https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1729 as well
2024-11-27 16:49:13 <@ravanelli:matrix.org> when you say out, do you mean not load them?
2024-11-27 16:49:25 <@siosm:matrix.org> keeping those modules out has value as it makes the initramfs smaller and thus the amount of memory that has to be reserved for kdump on a node smaller and thus makes using kdump more attractive
2024-11-27 16:49:58 <@siosm:matrix.org> I mean completely not included in the initramfs generated for kdump
2024-11-27 16:50:09 <@siosm:matrix.org> they won't be in it at all
2024-11-27 16:52:23 <@ravanelli:matrix.org> Any cons? If this initramfs is generated only for kdump, it seems there is no issues in removing it
2024-11-27 16:53:29 <@siosm:matrix.org> I don't see any disadvantages right now. From the ticket, the question was mostly about where this would be configured and it appears that the kdump team is working on a solution for that so that should be good.
2024-11-27 16:53:50 <@siosm:matrix.org> Unless someone wants to add something, I think we can move on.
2024-11-27 16:54:43 <@siosm:matrix.org> !topic Platform Request - Apple native hypervisor
2024-11-27 16:54:49 <@siosm:matrix.org> !link https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1533
2024-11-27 16:54:59 <@jlebon:fedora.im> this sgtm. i would probably analyze the size of the different modules and focus on the top ones instead of trying to be comprehensive, to reduce the maintenance burden also
2024-11-27 16:56:50 <@jlebon:fedora.im> i think dusty added this one because we don't have docs yet for it?
2024-11-27 16:57:17 <@siosm:matrix.org> Yes, appears to be the case. If folks are interested in this platform, a docs contribution would be appreciated!
2024-11-27 16:57:43 <@siosm:matrix.org> and I think that's it
2024-11-27 16:59:45 <@jlebon:fedora.im> any new f42 change proposals?
2024-11-27 17:00:26 <@marmijo:fedora.im> I ran the script yesterday and no new changes came through
2024-11-27 17:00:46 <@siosm:matrix.org> Thanks! Then let's go to open floor 
2024-11-27 17:00:57 <@siosm:matrix.org> !topic Open Floor
2024-11-27 17:01:26 <@siosm:matrix.org> I'll close the meeting in 5 minutes if we don't have anything else :)
2024-11-27 17:03:23 <@siosm:matrix.org> gursewak: signing you up for next week meeting as JB will likely still be on PTO
2024-11-27 17:09:20 <@siosm:matrix.org> Alright, closing :)
2024-11-27 17:09:26 <@siosm:matrix.org> !endmeeting