#fedora-meeting: Fedora QA Meeting

Meeting summary

1. Roll call (adamw, 15:01:43)
   
2. Previous meeting follow-up (adamw, 15:06:34)
   1. "adamw to start a discussion about btrfs question with anaconda and kernel teams to consider the idea of removing or hiding it in the installer" - I did that, and it turned into a pretty big discussion that's still ongoing. I'll try and get down to practical proposals when possible (adamw, 15:07:04)
   2. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/coreos@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/TOGJ5K7HM3OXNLIYZV3IEPCQ5YGY3JXV/ (kparal, 15:08:56)
   3. "coremodule and/or kparal to check with coreos team and update us on current status and plans for automated ec2 testing" - this was done and the answer was 'not yet but soon', see https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/coreos@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/TOGJ5K7HM3OXNLIYZV3IEPCQ5YGY3JXV/ (adamw, 15:10:16)
   
   
3. Fedora 31 status (adamw, 15:16:43)
   1. the 'default module stream upgrade problem' is not yet resolved or really being actively worked on (that is, the situation like libgit2 where the default module stream changes from one release to the next but this cannot be 'followed' on upgrade) (adamw, 15:28:53)
   2. aside from that, f31 status is 'generally OK without major systemic issues', blocker bugs are being addressed one by one (adamw, 15:29:56)
   
   
4. Criteria proposals: Xen / EC2, btrfs (adamw, 15:32:15)
   1. ACTION: adamw to poke some people about whether we have or can set up an account for EC2 testing so people don't have to spend money to test it (adamw, 15:39:56)
   2. on btrfs, the discussion branched out quite a long way and we're still working towards concrete proposals (adamw, 15:41:23)
   3. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DKKSIOJ5TGS67AT7JS2N4RVNXRUKHPEM/ (cmurf, 15:48:39)
   
   
5. Open floor (adamw, 15:58:40)
   1. jumping ahead to open floor due to lack of time (adamw, 15:58:47)

Action items

1. adamw to poke some people about whether we have or can set up an account for EC2 testing so people don't have to spend money to test it

Action items, by person

1. adamw
   1. adamw to poke some people about whether we have or can set up an account for EC2 testing so people don't have to spend money to test it

People present (lines said)

1. adamw (89)
2. cmurf (18)
3. zodbot (16)
4. kparal (12)
5. coremodule (9)
6. bcotton (7)
7. contyk (6)
8. tablepc (5)
9. frantisekz (4)
10. dan1mal (3)
11. sgallagh (2)
12. satellit_ (2)
13. pingou (1)