05:30:18 <paragan> #startmeeting i18n
05:30:18 <zodbot> Meeting started Tue Mar 12 05:30:18 2019 UTC.
05:30:18 <zodbot> This meeting is logged and archived in a public location.
05:30:18 <zodbot> The chair is paragan. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
05:30:18 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
05:30:18 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'i18n'
05:30:18 <paragan> #meetingname i18n
05:30:18 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'i18n'
05:30:18 <paragan> #topic agenda and roll call
05:30:18 <paragan> #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Meetings/2019-03-12
05:30:27 <tagoh> hi
05:30:28 <pwu> hi
05:30:37 <juhp> hi
05:31:12 <paragan> #chair tagoh pwu juhp
05:31:12 <zodbot> Current chairs: juhp paragan pwu tagoh
05:31:57 <vishal_vvr> hi
05:32:01 <paragan> let's wait a minute to see if more people can join
05:33:15 <paragan> @chair vishal_vvr
05:33:19 <paragan> let's start
05:33:34 <paragan> #topic Upcoming schedule
05:33:34 <paragan> #info 2019-03-26 	Beta Release (Preferred Target)
05:33:34 <paragan> #info 2019-04-02 	Beta Release (Target #1)
05:33:47 <paragan> we are currently in Beta freeze
05:34:07 <paragan> Bodhi is already activated for pushing updates to F30
05:34:36 <paragan> There is no successful compose for F30 since last 11 days now
05:35:16 <juhp> Bit worrying for our testday
05:35:51 <paragan> but we do have image generated for F30 SilverBlue https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/Fedora-30-20190312.n.0/compose/Silverblue/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-x86_64-30-20190312.n.0.iso
05:35:57 <paragan> not sure if its working
05:36:16 <juhp> aha
05:36:42 <paragan> I do see Workstation iso https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/Fedora-30-20190311.n.0/compose/Workstation/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-30-20190311.n.0.iso
05:36:54 <paragan> but still not sure if its working
05:37:25 <paragan> so koji composes have iso images, we can take the recent one and test it
05:38:07 <juhp> cool
05:38:30 <juhp> Wonder why they are not getting pushed then - didn't read the releng meeting log :)
05:38:49 <juhp> Other arches are blocked?
05:39:03 <paragan> maybe we want all the arches also built images
05:39:38 <paragan> at least we have something to test with ;-)
05:40:24 <paragan> also, FESCo approved F31 schedule
05:40:34 <paragan> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/31/Schedule
05:41:39 <paragan> is there anything to discuss for any issues related to F30 Schedule?
05:41:56 <paragan> If not then we can move to next topic
05:43:25 <paragan> we have Fedora 30 i18n test day next week Tue 19. We will discuss about it in our ticket discussions
05:43:29 <paragan> moving on
05:43:47 <paragan> #topic No assignee issues
05:43:47 <paragan> #info #105: Fedora 28 Bug triaging (pnemade)
05:43:47 <paragan> #link https://pagure.io/i18n/issue/105
05:44:39 <paragan> This one is picked as first ticket because QE people have planned bug triaging event
05:44:47 <paragan> it will be on 25th March
05:44:55 <paragan> #info https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/F28_I18N_Bug_Triage
05:45:42 <paragan> so let's work with them and try to triage, fix, close the F28 bugs
05:45:53 <juhp> Can we change the table column label from "Triage by" to say "Triager" or something
05:46:09 <juhp> ugh from "Triaged by"
05:46:33 <juhp> We want to assign people before not after triaging I suppose...
05:47:09 <juhp> Though dunno how to show completed - so I think we need one more column for that?
05:47:11 <paragan> I think its their internal work division like who is going to work/triage on bugs
05:47:15 <juhp> bbarve: ?
05:47:31 <juhp> I see
05:47:37 <juhp> their/our?
05:47:52 <paragan> I think their
05:48:24 <juhp> hmm language
05:49:05 <paragan> so the team will divide bugs into members and they work with devel people
05:49:18 <juhp> So we don't work on it?
05:49:49 <paragan> no I guess as its their own activity
05:49:53 <juhp> Alright
05:50:11 <paragan> maybe I am wrong in understanding their activity here but above is what I think
05:50:14 <juhp> hmm
05:51:16 <juhp> okay
05:51:26 <paragan> let's move
05:52:17 <paragan> #info #106: Fedora 30 i18n test day  (pnemade)
05:52:17 <paragan> #link https://pagure.io/i18n/issue/106
05:52:37 <paragan> so Fedora 30 i18n test day is coming next week
05:52:43 <paragan> 19th March Tuesday
05:52:57 <paragan> we have all the required things set up now
05:53:13 <paragan> Test day page => http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2019-03-19_I18N_Test_Day
05:53:23 <paragan> Results page => http://testdays.fedorainfracloud.org/events/58
05:53:54 <paragan> Request all to join on this day or maybe before or after that day to provide your test results
05:54:23 <vishal_vvr> paragan +1
05:54:37 <juhp> Yes
05:55:10 <paragan> thanks
05:55:47 <paragan> let's move to next ticket
05:56:40 <paragan> #info #108: add Fedora CI tests to our important packages (petersen)
05:56:40 <paragan> #link https://pagure.io/i18n/issue/108
05:57:46 <paragan> I think we all are working on writing tests for our packages and there is not much to provide update here
05:58:25 <juhp> What packages do we have in the pipeline?
05:59:02 <juhp> or what tests?
05:59:20 <paragan> I only tried one package to test if it provides metainfo file
06:00:30 <paragan> maybe all team members can check which 1-2 packages they are maintaining is important for Fedora and start working on writing tests.
06:00:45 <juhp> Yes
06:02:14 <paragan> not much from me to discuss here
06:03:01 <tagoh> Do we have any deadline for this?
06:04:12 <paragan> if needed we can set deadline for our team
06:04:39 <juhp> I am more concerned about getting started really at this point
06:06:29 <tagoh> need more information you mean?
06:07:07 <juhp> No, that we actually start to add tests
06:07:28 <paragan> Well it will good to have tests for our packages by F30 GA
06:07:39 <paragan> not all packages like said before
06:07:56 <juhp> I suppose this is more for f31 devel but that we should have some tests in place soon
06:08:04 <juhp> right
06:08:10 <paragan> yes
06:08:24 <paragan> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GatingRawhideSinglePackageUpdates
06:10:14 <paragan> #topic Open Floor
06:10:22 <paragan> anything to discuss here?
06:10:23 <juhp> Should we all try to have one or more tests in place by the end of this month?
06:11:02 <tagoh> sounds good to me.
06:11:05 <paragan> #chair
06:11:05 <zodbot> Current chairs: juhp paragan pwu tagoh
06:11:58 <paragan> Looks good to me as well
06:12:48 <paragan> updating ticket with above decision
06:12:57 <tagoh> does it need to be reviewed by someone after that?
06:14:13 <paragan> if CI run is successful then I guess you have worked fine in writing tests.
06:14:32 <juhp> It wouldn't hurt to have review
06:15:28 <tagoh> We don't have any requirements for testing so far. so just wonder if added testing is sufficient or not.
06:15:33 <paragan> yes. People who are ready to push or already pushed can contact other members of team or even send an email on i18n list for review of your tests.
06:15:43 <tagoh> anyway, will update the ticket once I've done some
06:16:58 <juhp> great
06:17:10 <juhp> That's what i meant by getting started :)
06:18:33 <paragan> anything more to discuss?
06:19:50 <paragan> Closing meeting in 2 minutes
06:20:02 <pravins> paragan: sure, i gone through the logs. Looks good to me.
06:20:22 <paragan> Ok
06:21:28 <paragan> Thanks all who came to this meeting :)
06:21:40 <paragan> #endmeeting