releng
LOGS
16:00:14 <jednorozec> #startmeeting RELENG (2021-12-14)
16:00:14 <zodbot> Meeting started Tue Dec 14 16:00:14 2021 UTC.
16:00:14 <zodbot> This meeting is logged and archived in a public location.
16:00:14 <zodbot> The chair is jednorozec. Information about MeetBot at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zodbot#Meeting_Functions.
16:00:14 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
16:00:14 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'releng_(2021-12-14)'
16:00:14 <jednorozec> #meetingname releng
16:00:14 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'releng'
16:00:14 <jednorozec> #chair nirik sharkcz pbrobinson pingou mboddu dustymabe ksinny jednorozec
16:00:14 <jednorozec> #topic init process
16:00:14 <zodbot> Current chairs: dustymabe jednorozec ksinny mboddu nirik pbrobinson pingou sharkcz
16:04:45 * mboddu is in a meeting, but should be available in 10 min
16:07:00 <jednorozec> I don't have much updates from the last week.
16:07:11 <jednorozec> Let me check the tracker
16:10:09 <jednorozec> oh
16:10:11 <jednorozec> this is new
16:10:14 <jednorozec> .releng 10465
16:10:14 <zodbot> jednorozec: Issue #10465: Unable to build a new flatpak - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10465
16:13:46 <mboddu> That is something we should ping David or Vipul, its in OSBS
16:14:05 <jednorozec> I am lookinginto the logs and it is really strange
16:14:17 <jednorozec> I will ping them both on the ticket
16:14:54 <Leo[m]> hello :)
16:17:22 <jednorozec> ok what do we have next here
16:18:46 <jednorozec> .releng 10461
16:18:47 <zodbot> jednorozec: Issue #10461: Tagging packages for update - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10461
16:18:51 <jednorozec> I will close this one
16:18:56 <jednorozec> it should be fixed
16:20:45 <jednorozec> .releng 10456
16:20:46 <zodbot> jednorozec: Issue #10456: Bootstrap of rust packages in EPEL9 - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10456
16:21:45 <mboddu> jednorozec: In the previous ticket, how did you fix the partio builds?
16:23:10 <jednorozec> mboddu, tagged them with f*-u-testing tags and created the bodhi update
16:23:19 <jednorozec> oh
16:23:25 <jednorozec> candidate it was.
16:23:30 <jednorozec> they are in testing now
16:24:02 <mboddu> Yeah, you just need to tag them into candidate tag, that should be enough
16:24:47 <mboddu> Also, they were not cleaned up by mistake, the maintainer hasn't submitted the update for the build after building it. Hence it got cleaned up
16:25:31 <jednorozec> I thought I wrote that in the ticket
16:26:09 <jednorozec> and I did not
16:26:13 <jednorozec> let me add it there
16:26:26 <mboddu> np, just wanted to let you know :)
16:26:42 <jednorozec> I know why it was in the trash
16:28:36 <jednorozec> updated the comment
16:28:38 <jednorozec> anyway
16:28:42 <mboddu> And re: bootstrap of rust packages, its not a great idea to tag them into epel9 tag as epel9-next builds will have .el9.next dist tag
16:28:54 <jednorozec> right
16:29:12 <jednorozec> But I presume he want to tag them and rebuild app bumped for epel9
16:29:20 <jednorozec> *all
16:29:51 <mboddu> Hmm, he needs the epel9 branches in the dist-git anyway for it
16:30:21 <jednorozec> yes. But it should help a lot to use existing builds to do the rebuild
16:30:29 <jednorozec> atleast that is my understanding
16:31:07 <mboddu> And to keep the epel9 tag clean, maybe he can create a epel9 side tag, we can tag the builds into that side tag, let him bump/rebuild them and merge it back into epel9
16:31:20 <jednorozec> hmmm
16:31:24 <jednorozec> that is cleaner
16:32:03 <mboddu> I would suggest it rather than tagging them into epel9 next
16:32:16 <mboddu> I would suggest it rather than tagging them into epel9* tag
16:32:29 * jednorozec is writing the comment
16:32:50 * mboddu waits...
16:35:35 <jednorozec> done
16:36:01 <jednorozec> I will also tag it
16:37:18 <jednorozec> Ok I dont have anything more
16:37:26 * mboddu is nothing as well
16:37:42 <mboddu> I cant type today :)
16:38:22 <jednorozec> you are not alone
16:39:17 <jednorozec> I will give in another 2 mins and close the meeting if nobody has anything
16:42:34 <jednorozec> #endmeeting