fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting
LOGS
18:00:07 <nirik> #startmeeting Fedora Infrastructure Ops Daily Standup Meeting
18:00:07 <zodbot> Meeting started Wed May 26 18:00:07 2021 UTC.
18:00:07 <zodbot> This meeting is logged and archived in a public location.
18:00:07 <zodbot> The chair is nirik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
18:00:07 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
18:00:07 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting'
18:00:07 <nirik> #chair mboddu nirik pingou mobrien nb
18:00:07 <zodbot> Current chairs: mboddu mobrien nb nirik pingou
18:00:07 <nirik> #meetingname fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting
18:00:07 <nirik> #info meeting is 30 minutes MAX. At the end of 30, its stops
18:00:07 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting'
18:00:07 <nirik> #info agenda is at https://board.net/p/fedora-infra-daily
18:00:09 <nirik> #info reminder: speak up if you want to work on a ticket!
18:00:11 <nirik> #topic Tickets needing review
18:00:13 <nirik> #info https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues?status=Open&priority=1
18:00:15 <mboddu> Hello, I am here
18:00:20 * nb is not really here
18:00:59 * nb is IRC dumpster fire fighting
18:00:59 <nirik> hey mboddu.
18:01:05 <nirik> nb: thanks for that!
18:01:19 <nirik> .ticket 9979
18:01:20 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #9979: Notifications from bugzilla aren't nicely formatted/summarized - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9979
18:01:26 <mboddu> I can update the tickets
18:01:29 <nirik> this is related to or possibly a dupe of another one
18:01:46 <nirik> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9820
18:01:48 <mboddu> Yeah
18:02:05 <mboddu> Sorta related, but entirely
18:02:17 <mboddu> not entirely*
18:02:22 * mboddu needs more tea
18:02:22 <nirik> it's likely the same cause/same place to fix it.
18:02:27 <copperi> nb: keep on going
18:02:45 <mboddu> nirik: Close as dupe?
18:02:50 <nirik> so, I guess close it a dupe and add info about it to the main one?
18:02:52 <nirik> yeah.
18:02:56 <nb> FYI everyone - no more matrix bridges for now, until libera bridges are ready
18:03:02 <mboddu> Okay
18:03:27 <nirik> thats it on infra. Any releng?
18:03:47 <mboddu> Yea
18:04:13 <mboddu> .releng 10134
18:04:14 <zodbot> mboddu: Issue #10134: Shorten side-tag merge window by tagging builds after being singed all of them - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10134
18:04:43 <nirik> this is something that sounds easy, but is... not at all.
18:04:48 <mboddu> Yeah
18:04:55 <mboddu> Maybe add a staging tag inbetween?
18:04:56 <nirik> med/med/ops? med/high/ops?
18:05:03 <mboddu> +1
18:05:14 <nirik> well, how does robosignatory know something is a bundle?
18:06:00 <mboddu> Nope, instead of going from fxx-pending to fxx, update robosig config as fxx-pending to fxx-staging and once everything is signed, then move to fxx
18:06:23 <nirik> but what does 'everything' mean? idle? what if 100 unrelated builds come in?
18:06:51 <nirik> I think we would need a manual step.
18:07:02 <mboddu> The problem is waiting on signing, they want to sign everything before making it available in buildroot
18:07:39 <mboddu> Actually, we used to enable signing on side tags, but we kinda stopped doing it since we were really not creating many side tags lately
18:07:45 <mboddu> So, just bring that back?
18:07:55 <nirik> we could. it's kinda a pain... but it would solve this.
18:08:04 <mboddu> Yeah
18:08:30 <nirik> I'm fine saying that...so in adding side-tags, we should ask if they want them signed or not.
18:09:04 <nirik> we should ask about the f35-python one
18:09:06 <mboddu> Yeah
18:09:14 <mboddu> On it already
18:09:40 <nirik> ok, any other tickets in releng?
18:10:02 <mboddu> .releng 10135
18:10:03 <zodbot> mboddu: Issue #10135: python-pytest-freezegun is owned by the fedora-scm-requests operator, doesn't have the main alias - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10135
18:10:17 <mboddu> low, low, ops for the fix
18:10:48 <mboddu> But the problem is sometimes, pagure times out and assigns the project to whoever processed the ticket
18:11:02 <mboddu> Make fedscm-admin more reliable?
18:11:11 <nirik> yeah, I guess.
18:11:18 <nirik> if there is some way to do that. ;)
18:11:19 <mboddu> Which is a higher ask :D
18:11:26 <mboddu> Exactly :)
18:11:27 <nirik> or... have it be able to detect this and fix it?
18:11:50 <mboddu> Could be, let me comment on the ticket
18:12:02 <mboddu> That is all
18:12:40 <nirik> #topic work plans / upcoming tasks
18:12:40 <nirik> #info everyone should note what things they are hoping to work on over the next day/week
18:12:48 <nirik> #info friday is a red hat recharge day
18:12:53 <nirik> #info next monday is a holiday
18:13:09 <nirik> any other things we have planned for this week?
18:13:13 <copperi> in us ?
18:13:32 <nirik> mboddu: BTW, I started to do a cron for side-tag cleanup... but the script actually doesn't work. ;( Need to figure out why
18:14:02 <mboddu> copperi: Yes, in US we have both Fri and Mon as holidays
18:14:11 <copperi> ok
18:14:16 <mboddu> nirik: Let me know if I can help
18:14:54 <nirik> will do
18:15:03 <nirik> #topic Discussion items
18:15:12 <nirik> any tickets, blockers, pr's or anything to discuss?
18:15:42 <mboddu> nirik: No rawhide compose kicked off last night
18:15:53 <nirik> mboddu: oh? huh.
18:16:12 <mboddu> nirik: I noticed it just before the meeting
18:16:28 <mboddu> I couldn't see why, but I am kicking off one now
18:16:33 <nirik> ha. I see why
18:16:37 <nirik> no wait
18:16:48 <nirik> missing nfs mounts.
18:16:51 <nirik> fixed now
18:17:30 <mboddu> Oh, nvm me, I checked the nfs mounts on bodhi-backend01 thinking I am on rawhide box :D
18:17:31 <nirik> so go ahead now. :)
18:17:58 <mboddu> That is all
18:18:03 <asaleh> w.r.t. ... "Provide email alias allowing to contact EPEL maintainers ", I wanted to start working on that, but I am not sure what alias should I create? currently $(package)-maintainers seems to email everybody with certain level of acccess to the package in src.fp.o ... should I create new alias?
18:18:22 <nirik> asaleh: yeah.
18:18:36 <nirik> something like $(package)-epel-maintainers ?
18:18:59 <asaleh> ok, I can do that :)
18:19:02 <nirik> and I suppose for symetry we should change the existing one to fedora-maintainers and the old one to go to both?
18:19:55 <mboddu> +1
18:19:57 <nirik> ie, have 3 aliases, one for fedora one for epel and one for both?
18:20:05 <mboddu> Agreed
18:20:40 <asaleh> or I will create epel-maintainer and fedora-maintainer that sends to just the primary(?) maintainer, pagure already has that through bzoverrides, and -maintainers is the "email everybody"
18:21:36 <nirik> hum, yeah. I guess if someone has a specific epel contributors they would want them only to get epel ones?
18:21:49 <Southern_Gentlem> so is  https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/ a infrstructure issue or website issue
18:22:09 <nirik> infra...
18:24:20 <nirik> asaleh: I guess we could discuss more in ticket? or on list...
18:24:29 <nirik> Any other items?
18:24:39 <mboddu> None from me
18:26:25 <nirik> ok, thanks everyone!
18:26:27 <nirik> #endmeeting