15:00:37 <mboddu> #startmeeting RELENG (2020-06-02)
15:00:37 <zodbot> Meeting started Tue Jun  2 15:00:37 2020 UTC.
15:00:37 <zodbot> This meeting is logged and archived in a public location.
15:00:37 <zodbot> The chair is mboddu. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:37 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
15:00:37 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'releng_(2020-06-02)'
15:00:37 <mboddu> #meetingname releng
15:00:37 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'releng'
15:00:37 <mboddu> #chair nirik sharkcz pbrobinson pingou mboddu dustymabe ksinny jednorozec
15:00:37 <mboddu> #topic init process
15:00:37 <zodbot> Current chairs: dustymabe jednorozec ksinny mboddu nirik pbrobinson pingou sharkcz
15:00:51 * pingou but in a meeting but around
15:01:26 <nirik> morning
15:01:33 <mboddu> Morning guys
15:01:34 * nirik is also doing other things, but sort of here
15:01:44 <mboddu> I might keep this short for people working on better stuff
15:01:53 <mboddu> :D
15:02:23 * sharkcz is here
15:02:42 * pingou 's meeting ended
15:03:29 <mboddu> #topic #9486 Fedora Change Request: NSS CK_GCM_PARAMS change
15:03:34 <mboddu> #link https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9486
15:04:04 <nirik> I haven't read up on this.
15:04:36 <mboddu> I am confused by the change request, it feels like it requires a mass rebuild, and "If you do a mass rebuild without an update, you will trigger the source incompatibility issue." seems confusing
15:04:40 <nirik> sounds like it affects packages, but not releng directly?
15:04:48 <nirik> yeah, not sure
15:04:58 <mboddu> Yeah, not releng, but should we consider for mass rebuild or not is my question
15:05:05 <mboddu> consider it*
15:06:43 * mboddu gives couple of min for people to look at it
15:09:03 <nirik> I guess we defer to the change owner and say no mass rebuild
15:10:45 <mboddu> Okay, and if he wants to rebuild the packages that depend on nss, he can request/create a side tag
15:11:41 <mboddu> #info We will ask the owner if he wants to rebuild the packages that depend on nss and needs a side tag for it
15:12:02 * siddharthvipul is here, apologies for being late
15:12:18 <nirik> hey siddharthvipul. welcome
15:12:54 <siddharthvipul> nirik: :D thank you o/
15:13:55 <sharkcz> mboddu: I agree, all they should need is a rebuild in a side tag
15:14:45 <sharkcz> for packages that BR: nss-devel
15:15:33 <mboddu> sharkcz: Cool, thanks
15:15:47 <mboddu> pingou: "Invalid method: GET" while updating the pagure ticket :)
15:15:56 * mboddu retrying again, but just wanted to let you know :)
15:15:59 <pingou> mboddu: sounds right :)
15:16:03 <sharkcz> it's my conclusion after only a brief look :-)
15:16:10 <pingou> GET aren't made to update :)
15:17:13 <mboddu> pingou: Sure, but I submitted a comment which should be a POST request :)
15:17:32 <pingou> agreed, it should :)
15:19:24 <mboddu> #topic #9467 Testing compose from a side tag, possible?
15:19:29 <mboddu> #link https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9467
15:19:42 <nirik> this is kinda moot now... it's already merged.
15:19:42 <mboddu> So, the side tag is merged, but I didn't receive a compose request
15:19:50 <mboddu> Closing the ticket?
15:19:57 <nirik> yeah, +1 to close
15:20:35 <pingou> +1
15:20:44 <pingou> mboddu: I think they ended up using Adam's work
15:21:34 <mboddu> Okay
15:21:36 <mboddu> #topic #8105 Allow owners / maintainers and provenpackagers to untag (their) builds from Rawhide
15:21:42 <mboddu> #link https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8105
15:22:07 <siddharthvipul> ahha
15:22:07 <mboddu> So, I tested it last week by tagging a build into -updates-candidate tag
15:22:22 <mboddu> s/build/old build/
15:22:31 <mboddu> And see if it follows the gating
15:22:39 <mboddu> And it did not
15:23:07 <siddharthvipul> I was supposed to follow mboddu and document it, but as mboddu said, it didn't :}
15:23:11 <mboddu> The problem is bodhi is not going to create an update for the same build since there is already an update
15:23:35 <pingou> and a build can't be in two updates
15:23:42 <mboddu> yes
15:24:20 <mboddu> The only reason why I did that is, sometimes the older signed build get gc'ed
15:24:47 <nirik> yeah, ok, thats not gonna work then.
15:25:43 <mboddu> So, to make sure the build is signed, I tried tagging into -updates-candidate and make it follow the gating steps (and signing is part of the steps)
15:27:14 <mboddu> Not sure how we can do this unless we teach bodhi to create an update for older builds
15:27:18 <nirik> I think the only chance for something here is if we can get some policy to enforce the rule
15:28:00 <nirik> or something more clever that I can't think of now.
15:30:13 <mboddu> One thing we could do is, we can ask them to use fxx-pending tag and keep that config in robosig going further, but we have to come up with rules
15:30:47 <mboddu> So that we dont allow people to randomly tag old builds into fxx-pending tag
15:31:36 <nirik> well, or just: if you need something untagged from f33, file a ticket.
15:32:26 <mboddu> Which is what we have currently :D
15:33:35 <nirik> right
15:33:45 <nirik> but it doesn't seem like it's all that common...
15:35:26 <mboddu> #info Since its not possible to self service this ticket right now and its not that common, people can file a ticket with releng and we will untag it for them.
15:35:30 <mboddu> Closing the ticket
15:35:43 <siddharthvipul> mboddu: thank you, I am FREEE
15:35:43 <nirik> sure, lets see how much backlash we get. ;)
15:36:34 * mboddu going on PTO :D
15:36:45 <mboddu> Or I should have asked siddharthvipul to update the ticket :P
15:37:35 <siddharthvipul> mboddu: all peace :P
15:39:52 <mboddu> #topic #9068 Please delete `epel8` and `epel8-playground` branches for `rpms/buildbot`
15:39:57 <mboddu> #link https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9068
15:40:10 <mboddu> Also - https://pagure.io/releng/pull-request/9454
15:40:53 <nirik> huh, not sure they are waiting for us
15:41:37 <nirik> I mean the pr seems fine, but it needs to express the policy
15:41:38 <mboddu> The script seems okay to me
15:41:42 <nirik> I can update the tickets.
15:41:49 <mboddu> Thanks nirik
15:42:04 <mboddu> I will ask to rebase the PR as it has some merge conflict
15:42:49 <mboddu> Okay
15:42:57 <mboddu> #topic Open Floor
15:43:08 <mboddu> Anybody? Anything?
15:43:21 <nirik> next week is dc move week.
15:43:22 <mboddu> Sorry, I wanted to cut this meeting short, but....
15:43:38 <nirik> it's gonna be long and painfull, so everyone try and be kind...
15:44:22 <mboddu> nirik: "#info RelEng will go dark for at least day starting Sun and we are hoping to get back by Mon if not by Tue of next week"
15:44:25 <mboddu> Does that sound right?
15:49:55 <nirik> end of tuesday or later in the week depending on how things go
15:50:04 <nirik> tuesday is the big build move
15:50:11 <mboddu> nirik: Okay
15:51:12 <mboddu> #info RelEng will go dark from this coming Sunday to next week's Tuesday, everything should be back up by Wednesday and running smoothly*.
15:51:22 <mboddu> * Conditions apply :D
15:51:31 <mboddu> Anything else?
15:52:14 * mboddu gives 2 min before closing the meeting
15:54:15 <mboddu> Okay, thanks for joining
15:54:17 <mboddu> everyone
15:54:21 <mboddu> #endmeeting