fedora_arm_and_aarch64_status_meeting
LOGS
15:00:13 <pwhalen> #startmeeting Fedora ARM and AArch64 Status Meeting
15:00:13 <zodbot> Meeting started Tue May 23 15:00:13 2017 UTC.  The chair is pwhalen. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:13 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
15:00:13 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_arm_and_aarch64_status_meeting'
15:00:21 <jlinton> Morning.
15:00:22 <rric> hi
15:00:23 <pwhalen> good morning folks, whos here today?
15:00:51 <pwhalen> #chair pwhalen pbrobinson rric jlinton
15:00:51 <zodbot> Current chairs: jlinton pbrobinson pwhalen rric
15:01:11 <pwhalen> lets give it a minute for others to join...
15:01:47 * pbrobinson o/
15:02:46 <pwhalen> ok, lets get started...
15:02:53 <pwhalen> #topic 1) ==== Userspace Status  ====
15:03:36 <rric> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1451630
15:03:45 <rric> it was decided this is not a blocker
15:03:51 <pwhalen> we still have an issue building firefox
15:04:03 <pwhalen> rric, I was unable to reproduce
15:04:27 <rric> pwhalen, on which system?
15:04:35 <pwhalen> I wasnt at the blocker meeting (holiday here in Canada)
15:04:49 <pwhalen> mustang and seattle.
15:05:57 <pwhalen> rric, did this work previously?
15:06:16 <rric> pwhalen, I only remember the f25 installer
15:06:27 <jlinton> I think its been doing that for a while.
15:06:34 <rric> in f25 there was another issue
15:07:36 <pwhalen> might need to specify text on the kernel args. i dont think its a general regression
15:07:40 <pbrobinson> the easiest way to deal with that rric is to recreate the issue on x86 or armv7 as they're release blocking platforms, it it could be a freeze exception
15:08:44 <pwhalen> did anyone have a chance to look at firefox?
15:09:13 <rric> pbrobinson, pwhalen, I could see if I can reproduce it on another arch or maybe fix it
15:10:25 <pwhalen> rric, ok, update the bz if you do.
15:10:39 <rric> pwhalen, sure
15:11:19 <pwhalen> #info Help appreciated with Firefox FTBS on aarch64 - https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=19586102
15:11:56 <pwhalen> aarch64 (and other arches) have been disabled for now
15:12:01 <pbrobinson> pwhalen: I was going to but I've not got around to it yet
15:12:20 <pwhalen> ok
15:12:50 <pwhalen> any other user space issues? we'll talk more about beta at the end and specific issues there
15:13:26 <ahs3_> i did look into rasdaemon -- it still has aarch64 patches missing, but they're also not in upstream yet
15:13:50 <jlinton> The firefox issue just looks like a Werror problem with a new warning?
15:14:28 <pbrobinson> there was also an issue with the partial mass rebuild that is currently being fixed
15:14:38 <ahs3_> and the upstream rasdaemon has moved, but the rawhide package has been updated documentation saying where
15:14:38 <pwhalen> ah! ahs3_ thanks kindly for that..
15:18:15 <ndufresne> jlinton, I see there is missing intrinsic include in skia, but why do it build skia backend ?
15:20:26 <pbrobinson> ndufresne: I believe for 2D rendering upstream has dropped non skia build options (or something like that)
15:21:32 * pwhalen is distracted. apologies.
15:22:00 <pwhalen> firefox will become more of an issue for us as we planned to offer desktops in f26
15:22:15 <pwhalen> lets move on though..
15:22:22 <pwhalen> topic 2) ==== Kernel Status ====
15:22:26 <pwhalen> #topic 2) ==== Kernel Status ====
15:22:48 <ndufresne> ok, well, that error is basically the lack of a #include that contains the maps from GCC specific to proper names, like __Float32x4_t -> float32x4_t (NEON code, maybe one can disable NEON for now)
15:23:14 <ndufresne> (sorry)
15:23:27 <pbrobinson> ndufresne: know if there's an upstream bug?
15:23:52 * ndufresne will have a look, let's move one ;-P
15:24:14 <pwhalen> ndufresne, drop it in channel if you find it
15:24:15 <pwhalen> thanks
15:24:34 <pwhalen> 4.11 is being built now for f25. no change in f26.. and f27 now has 4.12 rc2
15:25:01 <pwhalen> I've not looked too closely at 4.12, I should start.. anyone else?
15:25:25 <pbrobinson> rric: I still have on my todo list for this week to work through your patch dump
15:25:43 <rric> pbrobinon, ok sounds good to me
15:25:48 <rric> pbrobinson, thanks
15:26:32 <rric> pwhalen, I still see 4.10 in korg git for f25
15:26:50 <pwhalen> anyone else have patches for pbrobinson ? :)
15:27:40 <pwhalen> rric, 4.11 is building in koji now - https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=896684
15:28:04 <pwhalen> #info Please test and report any issues to the list or #fedora-arm.
15:28:04 * ahs3_ is not sure pbrobinson is patchable :)
15:28:12 <ndufresne> Could we enable the clock on DB410c ? assuming I provide the kernel config that is missing ? it would allow booting, no more though
15:28:17 <pwhalen> heh
15:31:07 <pwhalen> ndufresne, we may have lost pbrobinson , but he'll answer once back
15:31:52 <pwhalen> lets move on to beta..
15:31:59 <pwhalen> #topic 3) ==== F26 Beta ====
15:32:07 <pwhalen> #info Latest nominated compose - Fedora-26-20170522.n.1
15:32:41 <pwhalen> armhfp - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_26_Branched_20170522.n.1_Summary
15:32:51 <pwhalen> aarch64 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/AArch64/QA/Fedora-26-20170522.n.1
15:33:38 <pwhalen> I just started testing this morning, so far for armhfp.. initial-setup isnt working quite right. thankfully we should have a new build shortly that addresses it
15:34:19 <pwhalen> #info Full list of blockers: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/26/beta/buglist
15:34:36 <pbrobinson> sorry
15:34:37 <pbrobinson> back
15:35:31 <pwhalen> help testing would be greatly appreciated, confirm the hardware you care about works, or file bugs if it doesnt
15:35:41 <pbrobinson> ndufresne: sure, ping me those via a DM, it's already on my list to look closer at
15:35:56 <ndufresne> ok
15:36:00 <pwhalen> the go no-go decision meeting is this Thursday
15:37:07 <ndufresne> What level of testing is expected ?
15:37:20 <ndufresne> just the upgrade procedure ?
15:37:20 <pwhalen> I dont think any progress has been made on the upgrade bug - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1443415
15:37:40 <pwhalen> ndufresne, those links include test details..
15:38:01 <ndufresne> oh, I've seen someone reporting that the other day, will track this bug, as I'm likely to get that problem
15:38:04 <pwhalen> upgrades are one, testing disk images, different installs
15:38:47 <ndufresne> right, so I'll test the later here, someone told me there is a non-EFI method now
15:39:48 <ndufresne> will still be quite hackish on the DB410 as the mainline kernel is not really functional, and fed missing the main clock driver
15:40:01 <pwhalen> #info Please help test and add results to the wiki! F26 Beta Go/No-Go decision on Thursday.
15:40:13 <pwhalen> anything else for beta?
15:41:29 <pwhalen> #topic 5) == Open Floor ==
15:41:51 <pbrobinson> nothing from me
15:43:13 <pwhalen> #endmeeting