FAmSco thinks that in order to fix the problems
with FAD budget, we need to define "FAD" more clearly. Promo events
are not FADs and will be handled by the regional communities. Real
FADs will continue to be managed be the budget owner(cwickert,
18:09:21)
request for promo events go into the regional
trac instances as usual, FAD requests will be tracked in
fudcon-planning(cwickert,
18:10:10)
event owner and budget owner should make
descisions about sponsorships for FADs(cwickert,
18:10:39)
AGREED: : to solve
the issues about FAD budget, separate FADs from promo events more
clearly, but continue with the current setup: promo events will be
handled by the regional communities and FADs should be handled by
premier events budget owner and event owner of the FAD(cwickert,
18:13:11)
AGREED: : requests
for promo events will be tracked in the regional trac instances, FAD
requests go into fudcon-planing (or something yet to be
defined)(cwickert,
18:14:27)
AGREED: FAmSCo asks
for clarification who is supposed to be the "budget owner"(cwickert,
18:16:27)
ACTION: cwickert to
ask ambassadors for a new name for their FAD-like events(cwickert,
18:19:56)
it's highly recommended for everyone that they
should consider carefully before naming an event a FAD(cwickert,
18:21:03)