fpc
LOGS
16:00:19 <james> #startmeeting fpc
16:00:19 <zodbot> Meeting started Thu Jul 22 16:00:19 2021 UTC.
16:00:19 <zodbot> This meeting is logged and archived in a public location.
16:00:19 <zodbot> The chair is james. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:19 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
16:00:19 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fpc'
16:00:19 <james> #meetingname fpc
16:00:19 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fpc'
16:00:19 <james> #topic Roll Call
16:00:29 * limburgher here
16:00:33 <tibbs> Hey.
16:00:38 <james> #chair limburgher
16:00:38 <zodbot> Current chairs: james limburgher
16:00:40 <james> #chair tibbs
16:00:40 <zodbot> Current chairs: james limburgher tibbs
16:00:41 <decathorpe> hello o/
16:00:47 <james> #chair decathorpe
16:00:47 <zodbot> Current chairs: decathorpe james limburgher tibbs
16:04:27 <james> Well on the upside we don't have much to talk about with tickets/PRs tagge with meeting.
16:05:15 <james> #topic Open Floor
16:05:20 <tibbs> I actually tagged a few yesterday.
16:05:26 <tibbs> And merged a few.
16:05:29 <james> Anyone want to talk about anything with just the four of us?
16:06:06 <james> Ahh, yeh, PRs have changed a  lot since I did the email.
16:06:10 <decathorpe> I don't have anything FPC related
16:06:33 <james> tibbs: Anything you thin we can deal with?
16:07:39 <tibbs> I would just have merged 1085 but I thought it would be good for someone with more systemd experience to ack it.
16:07:50 * james looks around
16:07:56 <james> Anyone qualify?
16:08:30 <tibbs> It just mentions %_userunitdir.  Currently the guidelines don't talk about user units at all.
16:08:47 <james> decathorpe: Didn't you used to own syncthing?
16:08:48 <limburgher> I know a fair amount, but nothing about that.
16:09:09 <decathorpe> james: still do
16:09:26 <tibbs> Another major question that occurred to me is what we need to do to adapt to the autorelease and autochangelog stuff.
16:09:31 <james> Doesn't that use userunit?
16:09:44 <decathorpe> it does
16:09:44 <decathorpe> I can look at the PR.
16:09:50 <james> 👍
16:11:12 <james> tibbs: where did that question come from?
16:11:25 <tibbs> Me when catching up on the devel list.
16:11:39 <james> ahh
16:11:54 <tibbs> I noticed it was enabled but nothing came to us about it so I figured we would have to adapt.
16:12:19 <james> I mean it should "dtrt" as if the maintainer did things manually.
16:12:30 <james> So maybe we don't need to do much.
16:12:42 <james> But the policy should probably mention it soewhere.
16:12:52 <limburgher> Maybe "use this, but if you don't, do X"
16:12:57 <tibbs> Yeah, it would be worth it to at least mention it.
16:13:26 <tibbs> I don't know enough of the caveats to say whether we want to mention, suggest, recommend or mandate it.
16:13:50 * james nods
16:14:03 <decathorpe> I've used it for a fair amount of my packages already, I can look at the guidelines and check where it can be mentioned
16:14:05 <tibbs> I suspect that eventually it will be the way to do things but right now, probably not.
16:14:18 <tibbs> I also am sad that %autochangelog doesn't include the %changelog line.
16:18:41 <james> Ok, unless there is anything else I'll give you all 40 mins. back.
16:19:14 <decathorpe> +1
16:19:42 <tibbs> Thanks, folks.  I will try to hit some more of the open PRs.
16:20:01 <james> #endmeeting