14:35:00 <jbair> #startmeeting Fedora CI SIG 14:35:00 <zodbot> Meeting started Wed Jul 29 14:35:00 2020 UTC. 14:35:00 <zodbot> This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 14:35:00 <zodbot> The chair is jbair. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:35:00 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 14:35:00 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_ci_sig' 14:35:08 <jbair> .hello jimbair 14:35:09 <zodbot> jbair: jimbair 'Jim Bair' <jbair@redhat.com> 14:35:15 <jbair> bookwar: indeed, I do :) 14:35:24 <bookwar> .hello2 14:35:25 <zodbot> bookwar: bookwar 'Aleksandra Fedorova' <alpha@bookwar.info> 14:35:54 <tflink> .hello2 14:35:55 <zodbot> tflink: tflink 'Tim Flink' <tflink@redhat.com> 14:36:26 <bgoncalv> .hello2 14:36:27 <zodbot> bgoncalv: bgoncalv 'Bruno Goncalves' <bgoncalv@redhat.com> 14:36:38 <siddharthvipul> .hello siddharthvipul1 14:36:39 <zodbot> siddharthvipul: siddharthvipul1 'Vipul Siddharth' <siddharthvipul1@gmail.com> 14:37:57 <jbair> #topic mass rebuild bypassing bodhi and gating 14:38:11 <jbair> This was listed as an info in our document 14:38:20 <jbair> https://etherpad.gnome.org/p/fedora-ci 14:38:42 <bookwar> yes, i added it 14:38:51 <jbair> I believe the mass rebuilds also added to our jenkins fun last week when everything kept dying on us 14:38:56 <bookwar> it is just the informational note 14:38:58 <jbair> are the rebuilds completed or still ongoing? 14:39:01 <bookwar> in fact it didn't 14:39:16 <bookwar> mass rebuild is not going through bodhi 14:39:26 <bookwar> the rebuild is done via sidetag 14:39:40 <jbair> oh that's right, therefore, it wouldn't trigger - it was simply old cluster fun instead :) 14:40:02 <jbair> alright, thanks for the heads up! So, next topic is also from bookwar, a request for comments 14:40:15 <jbair> #topic Code style for Fedora CI Jenkins pipelines 14:40:25 <jbair> #link https://github.com/fedora-ci/docs/pull/1 14:40:44 <jbair> Basically, if you haven't, please review and provide feedback when time allows :) Anything else you wanted to add? 14:41:23 <bookwar> there are no enforcement fo rthe code style yet in any way, so it is more of the working document right now 14:41:37 <bookwar> i'd like to have a common ground when writing the pipeline code 14:41:42 <bookwar> all feedback is welcome 14:42:20 <jbair> I plan to review and comment today; I had planned on it yesterday but ended up keeping busy sadly 14:42:45 <jbair> okay so the next topic 14:42:52 <jbair> #topic question: Is running kvm supported on CentOS cluster? 14:43:00 <jbair> siddharthvipul: this question sounds like it's aimed at you :D 14:43:05 <bookwar> indeed :) 14:43:07 <siddharthvipul> yes 14:43:16 <siddharthvipul> :) 14:43:18 <bookwar> oh, that was easy :) 14:43:29 <siddharthvipul> we have kubevirt operator installed and you should be able to access kvm 14:43:47 <bookwar> thanks 14:44:29 <jbair> fast answers; the best kind of answers 14:44:42 <jbair> okay, and our last agend topic 14:44:46 <siddharthvipul> yayy :P 14:44:52 <jbair> #topic Messaging issue on JMS Plugin 14:45:01 <jbair> #link https://github.com/jenkinsci/jms-messaging-plugin/issues/200 14:45:24 <bookwar> this is the issue with reading fedora messaging anonymously form Jenkins 14:45:32 <bookwar> pingou: ^^ 14:45:40 <jbair> you beat me to pinging pingou :D 14:45:44 <tflink> 3 conversations at once :) 14:45:55 <tflink> it came up in #fedora-admin as well 14:46:02 <bookwar> it seems that there is a pr now 14:46:16 <jbair> well clearly this is the most important meeting, tflink 14:46:45 <tflink> there's another related issue in that the certs distributed with fedora-messaging require modification to work with jenkins 14:46:53 <tflink> unless that's changed 14:46:57 <tflink> but that's a pretty easy thing to fix 14:47:07 <jbair> #link https://github.com/jenkinsci/jms-messaging-plugin/pull/201 14:47:09 <jbair> PR in question 14:47:23 <bookwar> tflink: is there a link to it? 14:47:46 <tflink> there's no issue filed, if that's what you're asking 14:47:51 <bookwar> our certificates seems to work, but maybe andrei preprocessed them 14:47:53 <tflink> AFAIK, it's a limitation of jenkins/java 14:48:31 <tflink> it's just a few commands to translate them but they do require having a password added 14:48:44 <bookwar> ah, i see 14:49:11 * tflink is in the process of writing that up, has been on the backlog for a while 14:49:17 <bookwar> i guess then we will wait for the resolution on the 200, it will at least gives us the independent triggering 14:49:34 <bookwar> it is nice to see some progress there, let's hope it will be resolved soon 14:50:04 <tflink> I suspect we could ask for the modified certs to be distributed with fedora-messaging or make them available some other way 14:50:25 <tflink> given the nature of those specific certs, publishing a 'password' with them wouldn't be a security issue 14:50:36 <bookwar> good point 14:52:19 <jbair> alright, it sounds like we're good there and we'll hope the PR solves it going forward, just be aware for now 14:52:21 <jbair> #topic open discussion 14:52:33 <jbair> anything else we missed that we wanted to talk about? We still have 7 whole minutes :) 14:55:04 <jbair> #endmeeting