16:00:55 <adamw> #startmeeting F35-blocker-review
16:00:55 <zodbot> Meeting started Mon Oct 11 16:00:55 2021 UTC.
16:00:55 <zodbot> This meeting is logged and archived in a public location.
16:00:55 <zodbot> The chair is adamw. Information about MeetBot at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zodbot#Meeting_Functions.
16:00:55 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
16:00:55 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'f35-blocker-review'
16:00:56 <zodbot> lruzicka2: lruzicka 'Lukáš Růžička' <lruzicka@redhat.com>
16:01:03 <adamw> #meetingname F35-blocker-review
16:01:03 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'f35-blocker-review'
16:01:07 <adamw> #topic Roll Call
16:01:50 <adamw> morning folks, who's around for blocker review fun?
16:02:08 <lruzicka2> we are, we are, our king and master
16:02:20 * coremodule is here, your willing secretary.
16:02:31 <coremodule> *willing to act as secretary
16:02:48 <coremodule> first way sounded weird
16:03:47 <adamw> no i like it better that way
16:03:58 <coremodule> well fine then
16:06:08 <adamw> aaanybody else
16:08:36 <adamw> welp, let's get rolling and see how it goes
16:08:51 <adamw> #chair cmoremodule frantisekz
16:08:51 <zodbot> Current chairs: adamw cmoremodule frantisekz
16:08:55 <adamw> grr
16:09:07 <adamw> #chair coremodule
16:09:07 <zodbot> Current chairs: adamw cmoremodule coremodule frantisekz
16:09:08 <adamw> #unchair cmoremodule
16:09:08 <zodbot> Current chairs: adamw coremodule frantisekz
16:09:19 <adamw> #topic Introduction
16:09:23 <adamw> Why are we here?
16:09:23 <lruzicka2> we do not see more modules
16:09:29 <adamw> #info Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs.
16:09:34 <adamw> #info We'll be following the process outlined at:
16:09:38 <adamw> #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
16:09:44 <adamw> #info The bugs up for review today are available at:
16:09:48 <adamw> #link http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current
16:09:52 <adamw> #info The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at:
16:09:56 <adamw> #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Basic_Release_Criteria
16:10:00 <adamw> #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Beta_Release_Criteria
16:10:05 <adamw> #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Final_Release_Criteria
16:10:08 <adamw> #info for Final, we have:
16:10:15 <adamw> #info 7 Proposed Blockers
16:10:20 <adamw> #info 12 Accepted Blockers
16:10:23 <adamw> #info 8 Accepted Freeze Exceptions
16:10:35 <adamw> #info coremodule will secretarialize
16:10:40 <adamw> #topic Proposed Final blockers
16:10:51 <adamw> #topic (2009460) It's impossible to take a screenshot on Wayland with GNOME 41
16:10:54 <adamw> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009460
16:11:00 <adamw> #link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/526
16:11:04 <adamw> #info Proposed Blocker, gnome-shell, NEW
16:11:07 <adamw> #info Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+1,0,-3) (+lruzicka, -catanzaro, -kparal, -frantisekz)
16:11:35 <frantisekz> (it seems lruzicka mixed up screenshot shortcuts a bit, see the bz discussion/last kparal's comment)
16:11:43 <coremodule> its bad, it breaks basic functionality, but I can't see us actually blocking the release on it
16:11:46 <adamw> lruzicka2: according to kparal, you...yeah
16:11:57 <adamw> i'm -1, do you want to change your vote, lruzicka?
16:12:18 <lruzicka2> wait a moment
16:12:42 <coremodule> I'm -1 blocker
16:13:00 <lruzicka2> I cannot take a screenshot using Ctrl-Shift-Print, is that ok?
16:13:07 <lruzicka2> or are you not seeing it?
16:14:00 <lruzicka2> because I am using this combo quite a lot and was surprised it did not work, therefore I was +1 on this one
16:14:16 <lruzicka2> on the other hand, everything else worked for me
16:15:01 <adamw> it looks like perhaps they changed the shortcut?
16:15:18 <lruzicka2> oh my, let me see, I am now reading kparal's comment
16:15:40 <adamw> yeah, my list of shortcut keys is the same as kamil's
16:15:53 <lruzicka2> I am taking it back, mea culpa
16:16:02 <adamw> shift+prtsc saves screenshot of an area to Pictures, ctrl+shift+prtsc sends it to clipboard
16:16:02 <lruzicka2> it works as kamil has described
16:16:11 <coremodule> even better, it's not actually broken
16:16:14 <lruzicka2> -1 FB then
16:17:09 <Southern_Gentlem> -1 blocker
16:17:27 <adamw> proposed #agreed 2009460 - RejectedBlocker (Final) - multiple testers found no bugs in basic functionality here, screenshot taking generally works as intended via shortcuts and in the app launched from the overview
16:17:46 <coremodule> ack
16:18:19 <lruzicka2> ack
16:19:48 <adamw> any more acks?
16:19:52 <lruzicka2> frantisekz, we need acks
16:19:58 <coremodule> axe
16:20:05 <Southern_Gentlem> ack
16:20:16 <adamw> #agreed 2009460 - RejectedBlocker (Final) - multiple testers found no bugs in basic functionality here, screenshot taking generally works as intended via shortcuts and in the app launched from the overview
16:20:29 <adamw> #topic (2012817) missing Source drop-down in gnome-software -> not allowing to uninstall applications, misleading users
16:20:33 <adamw> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012817
16:20:37 <adamw> #link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/529
16:20:41 <adamw> #info Proposed Blocker, gnome-software, NEW
16:20:44 <adamw> #info Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+0,0,-1) (-frantisekz)
16:21:39 <Eighth_Doctor> based on the discussion, I'm -1 FinalBlocker
16:21:42 <Eighth_Doctor> also.. hi :)
16:21:47 <Eighth_Doctor> .hello ngompa
16:21:48 <zodbot> Eighth_Doctor: ngompa 'Neal Gompa' <ngompa13@gmail.com>
16:22:10 <adamw> yeah, same as conan, per milan's feedback in the bug i'm -1 blocker
16:22:35 <Southern_Gentlem> -1 blocker
16:22:39 <adamw> seems like this could be fixed in the app metadata as well...
16:22:53 <coremodule> -1 blocker
16:23:21 <lruzicka2> well, I spotted this for Homebank which is an RPM and Fedora App, but yeah, it could have bad metadata.
16:23:44 <lruzicka2> Fedora -> Fedora Flatpak
16:24:32 <lruzicka2> I am actually not sure whether I should support -1, but I will keep silent and sit in the corner.
16:24:37 <adamw> lruzicka2: the bug report decision says it's likely specific to homebank
16:24:57 <adamw> there is something about homebank's metadata which makes software not realize the rpm and flatpak are the same app
16:25:04 <adamw> s/decision/discussion/
16:25:34 <adamw> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/-/issues/1490#note_1287432
16:25:35 <lruzicka2> ok, it seems so
16:27:47 <lruzicka2> let make it a passer then, -1
16:27:59 <adamw> ok
16:29:06 <adamw> proposed #agreed 2012817 - RejectedBlocker (Final) - per discussion in the bug reports downstream and upstream the problems here seem to be triggered by specific qualtiies of Homebank's flatpak metadata, thus they're not really broad enough to count as basic functionality failures (and can be fixed outside of Fedora, in the metadata)
16:29:18 <frantisekz> ack
16:29:24 <coremodule> ack
16:29:28 <lruzicka2> ack
16:29:43 <Southern_Gentlem> ack
16:29:47 <adamw> #agreed 2012817 - RejectedBlocker (Final) - per discussion in the bug reports downstream and upstream the problems here seem to be triggered by specific qualtiies of Homebank's flatpak metadata, thus they're not really broad enough to count as basic functionality failures (and can be fixed outside of Fedora, in the metadata)
16:30:14 <adamw> #topic (2012863) Gnome Software does not refresh after installation from RPM.
16:30:15 <adamw> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012863
16:30:15 <adamw> #link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/530
16:30:15 <adamw> #info Proposed Blocker, gnome-software, NEW
16:30:45 <lruzicka2> cosmetic glitch
16:31:08 <adamw> yeah, i think this is probably not serious enough to count as 'basic functionality' really
16:31:13 <Eighth_Doctor> not only is this pretty much cosmetic IMO, it also didn't happen on my system
16:31:17 <Eighth_Doctor> -1 FinalBlocker
16:31:56 <Southern_Gentlem> -1 fb
16:32:06 <lruzicka2> -1 fb
16:32:15 <coremodule> -1 blocker
16:34:10 <frantisekz> -1 blocker
16:34:16 <adamw> proposed #agreed 2012863 - RejectedBlocker (Final) - as no practical consequences of this have been identified, we agreed it's not really significant enough to count as a failure of "basic functionality", and so it does not meet the blocker criteria
16:34:25 <lruzicka2> ack
16:34:45 <coremodule> ack
16:34:51 <Southern_Gentlem> ack
16:34:52 <frantisekz> ack
16:35:18 <adamw> #agreed 2012863 - RejectedBlocker (Final) - as no practical consequences of this have been identified, we agreed it's not really significant enough to count as a failure of "basic functionality", and so it does not meet the blocker criteria
16:35:30 <adamw> #topic (2011928) Fedora 35 aarch64 cloud image based openstack VM hangs
16:35:33 <adamw> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2011928
16:35:36 <adamw> #link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/525
16:35:40 <adamw> #info Proposed Blocker, kernel, NEW
16:35:43 <adamw> #info Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+1,0,-0) (+bcotton)
16:35:56 <adamw> on principle i'd be +1 for this if it's reproducible, just would be good to have confirmation
16:36:19 <adamw> i don't know off hand where i'd go to test this, is there an openstack instance we have access to with aarch64 options?
16:38:21 <lruzicka2> no idea here
16:41:01 <Southern_Gentlem> nothing i can test it with here
16:42:06 <Eighth_Doctor> I don't have anything to test with :(
16:42:55 <Southern_Gentlem> +1 punt
16:45:18 <adamw> it's a bit late to punt, really
16:46:32 <coremodule> perhaps we could ask dustymabe to test for us?
16:46:48 <coremodule> I saw he cc'ed himself
16:47:47 <Southern_Gentlem> just becasue we cant test it we shouldnt +1 or -1 at this point
16:50:03 <adamw> i guess we can punt and try to figure it out this week
16:50:05 <lruzicka2> if there is a possibility that it breaks we should be +1, even if we can't test
16:50:12 <adamw> realistically we're gonna need to try and look into it more whatever teh vote is...
16:50:58 <lruzicka2> there should be a gonogo meeting, so we should know by then, is it possible to find someone to test?
16:52:28 <adamw> i'm going to ask the cloud and arm folks about it after this meeting.
16:53:13 <adamw> proposed #agreed 2011928 - punt (delay decision) - this is definitely a worrying bug but so far we have only a single reporter and not much detail or feedback from kernel/arm/cloud groups. we will try to get more input on this issue this week and take further action
16:53:29 <coremodule> ack
16:53:33 <Southern_Gentlem> ack
16:53:39 <lruzicka2> ack
16:53:40 <frantisekz> ack
16:54:59 <adamw> #agreed 2011928 - punt (delay decision) - this is definitely a worrying bug but so far we have only a single reporter and not much detail or feedback from kernel/arm/cloud groups. we will try to get more input on this issue this week and take further action
16:55:22 <adamw> #topic (2008803) openh264 crashes for all videos
16:55:26 <adamw> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2008803
16:55:30 <adamw> #link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/521
16:55:38 <adamw> #info Proposed Blocker, openh264, MODIFIED
16:55:41 <adamw> #info Ticket vote: 0Day (+8,0,-0) (+catanzaro, +mohanboddu, +bcotton, +kevin, +lruzicka, +geraldosimiao, +ngompa, +frantisekz)
16:55:49 <adamw> oh, heh
16:55:54 <adamw> there's a limitation in the blockerbugs UI here
16:56:16 <adamw> I didn't resolve this before the meeting as the webUI shows "+0, 0, -0" because it doesn't show 0Day votes
16:57:05 <adamw> proposed #agreed 2008803 - Accepted0Day - this is accepted as a 0-day blocker by ticket vote of +8 (was not cleared before meeting due to blockerbugs webUI limitation)
16:57:19 <coremodule> ack
16:57:25 <lruzicka2> ack
16:57:38 <frantisekz> ack
16:59:07 <coremodule> adamw, do I mark the whiteboard as anything special for a 0-day bug?
16:59:17 <adamw> yes
16:59:36 <adamw> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process#Normal.2C_0-Day_and_Previous_Release_blockers
16:59:37 <adamw> #agreed 2008803 - Accepted0Day - this is accepted as a 0-day blocker by ticket vote of +8 (was not cleared before meeting due to blockerbugs webUI limitation)
16:59:39 <coremodule> thanks
17:01:37 <adamw> #topic (2011774) Toggled repos in Discover jump to the bottom of the list, and other repo names are changed to undefined
17:01:45 <adamw> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2011774
17:01:48 <adamw> #link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/528
17:01:51 <adamw> #info Proposed Blocker, plasma-discover, NEW
17:04:16 <frantisekz> hmm, I don't think this is a blocker
17:04:49 <coremodule> if it's just a redrawing issue, I would agree
17:05:06 <coremodule> annoying, but not worth blocking on
17:06:07 <adamw> yeah, i'm kiiinda in the same place
17:06:15 <lruzicka2> agree
17:06:16 <Southern_Gentlem> -1FB
17:06:18 <adamw> it does look pretty dumb, but it works
17:06:25 <lruzicka2> -1 FB
17:06:28 <frantisekz> -1 FB
17:06:31 <adamw> what do we think about FE?
17:06:32 <coremodule> -1 blocker
17:06:51 <Southern_Gentlem> +1fe
17:07:08 <lruzicka2> +1 fe, this might not be very problematic
17:07:23 <coremodule> +1 fe
17:07:59 <frantisekz> +1 FE
17:09:11 <adamw> alright
17:09:21 <geraldosimiao> Ohhh missed the meeting today. Is holiday here tiday and tomorrow
17:09:26 <geraldosimiao> Today
17:09:59 <lruzicka2> geraldosimiao, we are far from finished :D
17:09:59 <adamw> proposed #agreed 2011774 - RejectedBlocker (Final) AcceptedFreezeException (Final) - we agreed that while this looks bad, the operation does work, so critical functionality is maintained. It's accepted as an FE issue if it can be fixed relatively safely, as it does look pretty bad.
17:10:07 <lruzicka2> ack
17:10:11 <coremodule> ack
17:10:14 <adamw> geraldosimiao: it's a holiday here too, yet here i am like an idiot :D
17:10:17 <frantisekz> ack
17:10:46 <geraldosimiao> Ohh, you're not like an idiot adamw
17:11:04 <adamw> i am an idiot? :D
17:11:07 <geraldosimiao> Don't say that 😶
17:11:26 <Southern_Gentlem> adamw, holiday here as well but here we are
17:11:55 <coremodule> adamw, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfYtMLe7gqI
17:12:20 <adamw> #agreed 2011774 - RejectedBlocker (Final) AcceptedFreezeException (Final) - we agreed that while this looks bad, the operation does work, so critical functionality is maintained. It's accepted as an FE issue if it can be fixed relatively safely, as it does look pretty bad.
17:12:20 <adamw> #topic (2011231) HDMI Audio Device is invisible/inactive unless you manually assign it a profile
17:12:21 <adamw> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2011231
17:12:21 <adamw> #link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/511
17:12:23 <adamw> #info Proposed Blocker, plasma-systemsettings, NEW
17:12:27 <adamw> #info Ticket vote: FinalFreezeException (+4,0,-0) (+bcotton, +mohanboddu, +kevin, +adamwill)
17:13:26 <frantisekz> maybe, can somebody try hdmi audio out on something different than amd gpu?
17:14:17 <adamw> my monitor doesn't have speakers, i'd have to wiggle things around a bit to plug into the tv...
17:14:37 <adamw> anyone else have it more handy than me?
17:14:43 <lruzicka2> I tried this on my desktop today and it did not work very well. It was visible, but it did not receive any sound until I chose the profile
17:14:47 <coremodule> not a kde install
17:15:02 <coremodule> I can install one, but will take a few minutes
17:15:12 <lruzicka2> mine was on Workstation, behaving similarly to the KDE bug
17:15:54 <lruzicka2> on the other hand, it seemed like there might be various profiles ready for multiple HDMI outputs, so this actually might not be a bug but a feature
17:16:01 <frantisekz> hmm, I didn't hit this on Workstation at all
17:16:03 <frantisekz> worked just fine
17:16:19 <frantisekz> (everything else being the same - pipewire, wireplumber, kernel...)
17:16:36 <geraldosimiao> I don't have hardware to test that, sorry 😔
17:17:46 <adamw> frantisekz: could you test it on f34 as well to see if it's different there?
17:17:59 <lruzicka2> this was the first time, I had such an experience, so **shrug**
17:19:05 <frantisekz> yeah, I can try that on f34, but not right away
17:19:19 <frantisekz> I'll post my findings to the bz, I barely remember it was ok
17:19:56 <adamw> so we seem a bit...fuzzy on this
17:20:00 <lruzicka2> however, it seems to work with certain tweakings, so what if we put into the common bugs and let it go?
17:20:15 <frantisekz> lruzicka: I think it should use some profile by default, so you can get at least some sound
17:20:39 <frantisekz> just to note, I don't think this should be a blocker
17:20:43 <lruzicka2> frantisekz, if it was the only device, then perhaps, I would agree
17:21:24 <frantisekz> even if there were more devices imo, you'll choose the device that you want, you shouldn't need to care about profile for it
17:21:46 <adamw> i'm either -1 or punt on this one...
17:21:57 <lruzicka2> -1, common bugs
17:22:17 <frantisekz> -1
17:23:19 <geraldosimiao> -1 too, common bugs
17:23:40 <adamw> okay
17:24:24 <adamw> proposed #agreed 2011231 - RejectedBlocker (Final) - we agreed that this seems too limited in impact (at least to HDMI audio output on KDE, and possibly to the specific device) to be considered a criteria violation. note that it is already accepted as an FE issue.
17:24:40 <lruzicka2> ack
17:24:42 <frantisekz> ack
17:24:53 <coremodule> ack
17:24:59 <Southern_Gentlem> ack
17:25:47 <geraldosimiao> Ack
17:26:01 <adamw> #agreed 2011231 - RejectedBlocker (Final) - we agreed that this seems too limited in impact (at least to HDMI audio output on KDE, and possibly to the specific device) to be considered a criteria violation. note that it is already accepted as an FE issue.
17:26:43 <adamw> #topic Accepted Final blockers
17:27:00 <adamw> #info will skip ones that are clearly on the way to being resolved
17:27:13 <adamw> #info a reminder that we're checking status/progress here, not re-voting unless we specifically decide to
17:27:18 <adamw> #topic (1991075) time is transiently incorrect when Automatic Time Zone is enabled
17:27:22 <adamw> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991075
17:27:25 <adamw> #link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/389
17:27:28 <adamw> #info Accepted Blocker, geoclue2, MODIFIED
17:28:06 <adamw> #info the existing update does not fully resolve this
17:28:17 <adamw> #info desktop team are actively working on it and intend further progress today
17:28:53 <adamw> i think that's about all, not sure we can do much to move this along besides the folks already involved carrying on with what they're doing
17:29:35 <lruzicka2> yup
17:30:35 <adamw> #topic (1989726) [abrt] gnome-shell: cogl_texture_get_gl_texture(): gnome-shell killed by SIGSEGV
17:30:40 <adamw> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989726
17:30:43 <adamw> #link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/399
17:30:46 <adamw> #info Accepted Blocker, mesa, ASSIGNED
17:30:48 <adamw> this ol' chestnut
17:31:02 <frantisekz> :D
17:32:22 <adamw> #info per karol herbst's most recent comments this should be fixable now, we are waiting for him to submit the PRs he planned
17:32:31 <adamw> #action adamw to check in with karol if PRs do not show up soon
17:33:50 <adamw> #topic (2011291) Discover shows a misleading state of Flatpak repos, can't delete disabled repos
17:33:54 <adamw> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2011291
17:33:57 <adamw> #link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/512
17:34:00 <adamw> #info Accepted Blocker, plasma-discover, NEW
17:35:05 <adamw> i filed this upstream, upstream asked a couple of questions, but no real progress yet
17:37:44 <adamw> not sure what else we can do, here
17:37:51 <adamw> i asked rex if he can join us, but not sure if he's around
17:41:24 <adamw> #info this has been reported upstream and had some attention, but doesn't look like any prospect of a fix yet
17:42:34 <geraldosimiao> I think Rex it's at the kde SIG meeting right now
17:43:09 <adamw> ah
17:43:12 <adamw> darn overlaps
17:45:49 <adamw> #topic (2011322) Discover doesn't seem to find any RPM packages, neither locally installed nor in RPM repos
17:45:53 <adamw> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2011322
17:45:55 <adamw> #link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/515
17:46:00 <adamw> #info Accepted Blocker, plasma-discover, NEW
17:46:11 <adamw> so i'm kinda stuck on this one as i can't reproduce it. none of the things kamil describes are true in my KDE VM.
17:46:57 <adamw> geraldo said the same thing
17:48:14 <geraldosimiao> Well, I have reproduce it before upgrading to discover 5.23.
17:48:14 <geraldosimiao> With 5.23 discover discovered all the rpm...
17:48:35 <geraldosimiao> adamw: Indeed
17:49:09 <geraldosimiao> Have uploaded a video to prove it 🤷‍♂️
17:49:29 <adamw> but lruzicka said he could reproduce
17:49:46 <geraldosimiao> With 5.23?
17:50:59 <frantisekz> I haven't seen this issue with the Beta compose
17:51:06 <lruzicka2> I was able to reproduce last week ... I am not sure on which version, but I sort of thought I had verified several Discover bugs, so I believe this could have worked in the end.
17:51:08 <frantisekz> it wasn't working 100 % of the time
17:51:27 <frantisekz> but after bunch of refreshes/waiting it started to show even the rpms
17:51:57 <adamw> maybe it behaves badly until it's built a cache from repo metadata?
17:52:09 <adamw> depending on network connection that could take some time after initial install...
17:52:13 <frantisekz> I am trying it right now
17:52:29 <lruzicka2> I am afraid, I must put my kids to bed.
17:52:39 <geraldosimiao> Yes, I noticed it takes more time to build the cache. For me it's like almost 1 minute.
17:53:11 <lruzicka2> I deleted the VM, but I can put up a new one the first thing tomorrow and test it
17:53:17 <frantisekz> it is offering rpm updates just fine (seen it right now), offline upgrades are working well too
17:53:28 <lruzicka2> seems good then
17:53:42 <lruzicka2> I really need to hurry, sorry about it. Have a nice time.
17:54:52 <adamw> thanks
17:55:40 <adamw> #info there isn't any obvious progress on a fix for this, but myself and geraldo found we cannot reproduce the bug with 5.22 or 5.23, we get correct behaviour in all cases identified by kamil. we speculate this behaviour may occur only until some repodata is properly retrieved? we will continue to investigate
17:57:13 <geraldosimiao> Ok
17:57:43 <adamw> #topic (2011333) Toggling repo in Discover doesn't redraw the checkbox, confusing users
17:57:46 <adamw> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2011333
17:57:51 <adamw> #link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/517
17:57:56 <adamw> #info Accepted Blocker, plasma-discover, NEW
17:58:56 <adamw> #info no apparent movement on a fix for this either
18:01:37 <adamw> #action adamw to poke KDE team about series of unaddressed blockers, try and figure out an action plan
18:02:50 <adamw> #topic (2001837) The switch for Fedora Third Party repositories does not switch them on.
18:02:53 <adamw> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2001837
18:02:57 <adamw> #link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/455
18:03:00 <adamw> #info Accepted Blocker, selinux-policy, ASSIGNED
18:06:08 <adamw> #info there seem to be different findings as to whether this is yet fully fixed
18:06:17 <adamw> zdenek and lruzicka said it is, kparal said it isn't
18:06:29 <adamw> it'd be good if more folks can test and see
18:06:32 <adamw> i will try it today
18:06:46 <adamw> #info we will try to get more testing done to confirm whether this is actually fixed
18:07:10 <geraldosimiao> I think I already tried that, will see again tomorrow morning.
18:07:41 <adamw> thanks geraldo
18:07:41 <adamw> #topic Open floor
18:08:08 <adamw> as a quick note, we also need a blocker bug for final builds of fedora-repos and fedora-release , nirik is working on that
18:08:13 <adamw> i will ask folks to vote in the app when we're ready
18:08:43 * Southern_Gentlem thought nirik had already done it
18:09:06 <frantisekz> thanks everybody, I need to run!
18:09:16 <geraldosimiao> adamw: Ok
18:10:02 <Southern_Gentlem> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012948
18:10:29 <Southern_Gentlem> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012950
18:11:08 <nirik> Yeah, I filed em and built em.
18:11:29 <adamw> ah, but didn't propose 'em :D
18:11:31 <adamw> let me do that
18:12:28 <adamw> can we get quick sloppy votes on those two bugs? i'm +1 on both, they both clearly violate criteria as we've voted on a dozen times before (the 'correct repos' and the 'pre-release identification' ones)
18:14:07 <geraldosimiao> Ok, will vote now
18:14:33 <adamw> i meant here, but we can do it on the app too :D
18:14:39 <adamw> ticket might not exist yet, let me kick the bot
18:14:40 <nirik> note that I couldn't make fedora-release be 35-1, because it uses autorelease now
18:14:52 <nirik> but 35-33 should be working I would think
18:15:08 <adamw> as long as it's 1 or higher it should be fine
18:16:07 <geraldosimiao> Didn't find both at https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/35/final/buglist
18:16:38 <geraldosimiao> adamw: Oops ok here
18:16:39 <Southern_Gentlem> +1 on both
18:16:51 <geraldosimiao> +1 on both
18:16:57 <Southern_Gentlem> ack ack
18:17:06 <adamw> alrighty, rubber stamp in effect!
18:17:15 <geraldosimiao> Ack ack too
18:17:31 <geraldosimiao> 😆
18:18:15 <adamw> proposed #agreed 2012948 and 2012950 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - accepted as clear violations of "A fedora-release package containing the correct names, information and repository configuration for a final Fedora release must be present on release-blocking images"
18:18:36 <geraldosimiao> Ack
18:19:02 <Eighth_Doctor> ack
18:19:36 <adamw> #agreed 2012948 and 2012950 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - accepted as clear violations of "A fedora-release package containing the correct names, information and repository configuration for a final Fedora release must be present on release-blocking images"
18:19:42 <adamw> alrighty, i think that's everything...
18:20:25 <adamw> anyone got any other business?
18:20:46 <geraldosimiao> Nope
18:20:47 <Southern_Gentlem> nothing that the Battleaxe can handle
18:20:52 <Southern_Gentlem> cant
18:21:32 <geraldosimiao> Let's leave all for Neal to fix...
18:21:35 <geraldosimiao> ;)
18:22:03 <adamw> hehe good plan
18:22:07 <adamw> alright, thanks for coming out, everyone
18:22:10 <adamw> #endmeeting