========================================== #fedora-blocker-review: F34-blocker-review ========================================== Meeting started by adamw at 17:07:41 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2021-02-22/f34-blocker-review.2021-02-22-17.07.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (adamw, 17:07:41) * for Beta, we have: (adamw, 17:14:53) * 6 Proposed Blockers (adamw, 17:14:58) * 2 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (adamw, 17:15:03) * for Final, we have: (adamw, 17:15:17) * 2 Proposed Blockers (adamw, 17:15:22) * 3 Accepted Blockers (adamw, 17:15:22) * coremodule will secretarialize, thanks! (adamw, 17:15:48) * Proposed Beta blockers (adamw, 17:16:06) * +4 votes in ticket from frantisekz, bcotton, imsedgar and lruzicka (adamw, 17:17:33) * AGREED: 1929940 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - violates Basic criterion "It must be possible to configure a Fedora Server system installed according to the above criteria as a FreeIPA domain controller, using the official deployment tools provided in the distribution FreeIPA packages" (adamw, 17:21:24) * (1929940) FreeIPA server deployment fails in current F34 and Rawhide composes (adamw, 17:24:25) * AGREED: 1929940 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - violates Basic criterion "It must be possible to configure a Fedora Server system installed according to the above criteria as a FreeIPA domain controller, using the official deployment tools provided in the distribution FreeIPA packages" (adamw, 17:24:39) * (1929564) [abrt] gnome-control-center: g_settings_set_property(): gnome-control-center killed by SIGTRAP (adamw, 17:24:51) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929564 (adamw, 17:25:00) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/237 (adamw, 17:25:06) * Proposed Blocker, gnome-control-center, NEW (adamw, 17:25:14) * AGREED: 1929564 - AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) AcceptedBlocker (Final) - we agree this doesn't quite violate the Basic or Beta criteria, but does violate Final criterion "All applications...must start successfully and withstand a basic functionality test", and as it's a significant visible bug it would be desirable to fix it for Beta also (adamw, 17:31:56) * (1930977) [abrt] gnome-shell: nouveau_fence_signalled(): gnome-shell killed by SIGSEGV (adamw, 17:32:49) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1930977 (adamw, 17:32:55) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/241 (adamw, 17:33:02) * Proposed Blocker, gnome-shell, NEW (adamw, 17:33:07) * AGREED: 1930977 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - violates Basic criterion "A system installed with a release-blocking desktop must boot to a log in screen where it is possible to log in to a working desktop using a user account created during installation or a 'first boot' utility" for a supported aarch64 platform (adamw, 17:40:05) * (1931070) sddm crashes with mesa-21 on VMware (adamw, 17:40:13) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931070 (adamw, 17:40:19) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/236 (adamw, 17:40:24) * Proposed Blocker, mesa, NEW (adamw, 17:40:29) * AGREED: 1931070 - AcceptedFreezeException (Beta), punt (delay decision) on blocker status - we think this is serious enough to be an FE at least, but not sure yet if it's wide enough in impact to constitute a blocker. punting for more testing and also to look at fixing it (adamw, 17:53:05) * (1931384) No audio on Fedora 34 after pipewire 0.3.22-4 has been installed. (adamw, 17:53:15) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931384 (adamw, 17:53:20) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/239 (adamw, 17:53:25) * Proposed Blocker, pipewire, ASSIGNED (adamw, 17:53:29) * AGREED: 1931384 - RejectedBlocker (Beta) AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - as the affected package is not installed in any default F32 or F33 install, this does not violate the release criteria, but since it is known to be pulled in by popular third-party packages, we feel it's worth an FE to improve the upgrade situation during freeze if possible (adamw, 18:09:40) * (1930978) [abrt] xorg-x11-server-Xorg: System(): Xorg killed by SIGABRT (adamw, 18:09:57) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1930978 (adamw, 18:10:32) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/242 (adamw, 18:10:37) * Proposed Blocker, xorg-x11-server, NEW (adamw, 18:10:42) * AGREED: 1930978 - punt (delay decision) - we suspect this may be a dupe of #1930977, we will punt while pwhalen works that out (adamw, 18:14:32) * Proposed Beta freeze exceptions (adamw, 18:14:51) * (1909556) reboot hangs for 2 minutes: stop job is running for User Manager for UID 1000 (adamw, 18:14:57) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1909556 (adamw, 18:15:04) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/238 (adamw, 18:15:20) * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, gnome-session, POST (adamw, 18:15:22) * AGREED: 1909556 - AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - this affects live images, and is rather annoying (adamw, 18:19:58) * (1924908) Gnome session fails to start with "Oops, something went wrong" on first boot (adamw, 18:20:07) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1924908 (adamw, 18:20:13) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/240 (adamw, 18:20:17) * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, gnome-session, NEW (adamw, 18:20:21) * AGREED: 1924908 - AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - this doesn't prevent anything working in the end, but looks very bad as a first impression (adamw, 18:27:54) * Proposed Final Blockers (adamw, 18:28:24) * (1930401) No update notifications shown when updates available (F34, Rawhide) (adamw, 18:28:42) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1930401 (adamw, 18:28:46) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/234 (adamw, 18:28:51) * Proposed Blocker, gnome-software, NEW (adamw, 18:28:55) * LINK: https://giphy.com/gifs/NCjISbEPFxm48/html5 (adamw, 18:36:42) * AGREED: 1930401 - punt (delay decision) - this may not be broken but rather the test may need updating for new heuristics in GNOME 40, delaying decision while we work that out (adamw, 18:37:48) * (1929643) logout after switch returns the user to console instead of sddm (adamw, 18:38:11) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929643 (adamw, 18:38:15) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/235 (adamw, 18:38:24) * Proposed Blocker, sddm, NEW (adamw, 18:38:29) * AGREED: 1929643 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - this is held to violate a combination of the "Shutting down, rebooting, logging in and logging out must work..." and "User switching must work using the mechanisms offered..." criteria as proposed in the bug; it seems reasonable to expect both to work together. (adamw, 18:46:04) * Open floor (adamw, 18:50:47) Meeting ended at 18:54:26 UTC. Action Items ------------ Action Items, by person ----------------------- * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * adamw (151) * lruzicka[m] (40) * frantisekz (31) * pwhalen (30) * bcotton (19) * zodbot (15) * coremodule (13) * tablepc (12) * Southern_Gentlem (5) * cmurf (4) * lruzicka (0) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot