f32-blocker-review
MINUTES

#fedora-blocker-review: F32-blocker-review

Meeting started by coremodule at 17:00:08 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

  1. Roll Call (coremodule, 17:00:08)
  2. Introduction (coremodule, 17:05:04)
    1. Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (coremodule, 17:05:04)
    2. We'll be following the process outlined at: (coremodule, 17:05:04)
    3. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (coremodule, 17:05:04)
    4. The bugs up for review today are available at: (coremodule, 17:05:05)
    5. http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (coremodule, 17:05:07)
    6. The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (coremodule, 17:05:11)
    7. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Basic_Release_Criteria (coremodule, 17:05:13)
    8. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Beta_Release_Criteria (coremodule, 17:05:15)
    9. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Final_Release_Criteria (coremodule, 17:05:17)
    10. frantisekz to act as secretary (coremodule, 17:06:10)
    11. 6 Proposed Blockers (coremodule, 17:06:15)
    12. 3 Accepted Blockers (coremodule, 17:06:15)
    13. 0 Accepted 0-day Blockers (coremodule, 17:06:15)
    14. 0 Accepted Previous Release Blockers (coremodule, 17:06:15)
    15. 1 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (coremodule, 17:06:16)
    16. 2 Accepted Freeze Exceptions (coremodule, 17:06:17)

  3. (1806103) dasbus.error.DBusError: Failed to set new efi boot target. This is most likely a kernel or firmware bug. (coremodule, 17:08:17)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806103 (coremodule, 17:08:18)
    2. Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (coremodule, 17:23:10)
    3. AGREED: 1806103 - RejectedBlocker (Beta) – we don’t find this a direct violation of the criteria stated and agree that anaconda doesn’t need to show the pretty error. There is a fix already, so we will reject this and wait for that. If the anaconda devs want to contest this decision, we can talk about making the criteria more specific in these circumstances. (coremodule, 17:24:36)

  4. (1806233) pyanaconda.modules.common.errors.storage.UnknownDeviceError: home (coremodule, 17:25:08)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806233 (coremodule, 17:25:08)
    2. Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED (coremodule, 17:25:08)
    3. AGREED: 1806233 - RejectedBlocker (Beta) – we don’t find this a direct violation of the criteria stated and agree that anaconda doesn’t need to show the pretty error. There is a fix already, so we will reject this and wait for that. If the anaconda devs want to contest this decision, we can talk about making the criteria more specific in these circumstances. (coremodule, 17:31:06)
    4. AGREED: 1806233 - RejectedBlocker (Beta) – we don’t find this a direct violation of the criteria stated and agree that anaconda doesn’t need to show the pretty error. There is a fix already, so we will reject this and wait for that. If the anaconda devs want to contest this decision, we can talk about making the criteria more specific in these circumstances. (coremodule, 17:31:17)
    5. AGREED: 1806233 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) – Violates the criterion: “When using both the installer-native and the blivet-gui-based custom partitioning flow, the installer must be able to correctly interpret, and modify any disk with a valid ms-dos or gpt disk label and partition table containing ext4 partitions, LVM and/or btrfs volumes...” (coremodule, 17:34:47)

  5. (1804953) UEFI installs from live images fail since around Fedora-Rawhide-20200214.n.1 (boot loader entry creation fails) (coremodule, 17:35:09)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804953 (coremodule, 17:35:09)
    2. Proposed Blocker, efivar, NEW (coremodule, 17:35:09)
    3. AGREED: 1804953 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) – Violates the criterion: "The installer must be able to complete an installation to a single disk using automatic partitioning" for x86_64 UEFI (coremodule, 17:37:55)

  6. (1801820) [abrt] gnome-shell: js::gc::TenuredCell::writeBarrierPre(js::gc::TenuredCell*)(): gnome-shell killed by SIGSEGV (coremodule, 17:38:08)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801820 (coremodule, 17:38:08)
    2. Proposed Blocker, gnome-shell, ASSIGNED (coremodule, 17:38:08)
    3. AGREED: 1801820 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) – Conditionally violates the criterion: “No part of any release-blocking desktop's panel (or equivalent) configuration may crash on startup or be entirely non-functional.” We find this appropriate considering that the desktop is “entirely non-functional” after this crash occurs... (coremodule, 17:45:47)

  7. (1801882) installation of slf4j is broken unless maven module is disabled (coremodule, 17:46:10)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801882 (coremodule, 17:46:11)
    2. Proposed Blocker, maven, NEW (coremodule, 17:46:11)
    3. https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2341#comment-628267 (frantisekz, 17:47:50)
    4. AGREED: 1801822 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) – Violates the criterion: "It must be possible to configure a Fedora Server system installed according to the above criteria as a FreeIPA domain controller, using the official deployment tools provided in the distribution FreeIPA packages." (coremodule, 17:50:15)

  8. (1804080) anaconda unable to finish installation with software raid partition (coremodule, 17:50:28)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804080 (coremodule, 17:50:28)
    2. Proposed Blocker, python-blivet, NEW (coremodule, 17:50:28)
    3. AGREED: 1804080 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) – Violates the criterion: "The installer must be able to correctly interpret… any disk with a valid ms-dos or gpt disk label and partition table containing… software RAID arrays at RAID levels 0, 1 and 5 containing ext4 partitions.” (coremodule, 17:52:57)
    4. moving on to freeze exceptions (coremodule, 17:53:06)

  9. (1805916) reboot fails at the end of install - Error in atexit._run_exitfuncs (coremodule, 17:53:26)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805916 (coremodule, 17:53:26)
    2. Proposed Freeze Exceptions, anaconda, MODIFIED (coremodule, 17:53:26)
    3. AGREED: 1805916 - AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) – We don’t think the counts as a blocker, as by the time it rears it’s ugly little head, the system is already installed, but it looks bad, is limiting automated test coverage, and its fairly trivial to fix. (coremodule, 17:58:33)
    4. moving on to final blockers (coremodule, 17:58:43)

  10. (1804993) abrt-dump-journal-xorg: Cannot read journal data (coremodule, 17:58:55)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804993 (coremodule, 17:58:55)
    2. Proposed Blocker, abrt, NEW (coremodule, 17:58:55)
    3. AGREED: 1804993 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) – Violates the criterion: “All system services present after installation with one of the release-blocking package sets must start properly, unless they require hardware which is not present.” (coremodule, 18:02:14)

  11. Open Floor (coremodule, 18:02:48)
    1. frantisekz to follow up with the dnf team on an ETA for the FESCO-accepted blockers (coremodule, 18:04:39)
    2. cmurf to talk with pjones on the efivars-efibootmgr crash bug (coremodule, 18:06:07)
    3. we have async blocker bugs process in progress, code should be ready, we're waiting for new pagure release (coremodule, 18:06:20)


Meeting ended at 18:08:33 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. (none)


People present (lines said)

  1. coremodule (164)
  2. frantisekz (72)
  3. cmurf (59)
  4. lruzicka (35)
  5. zodbot (21)
  6. pwhalen (9)


Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.
Meetbot Logs © 2021-2022 Fedora Websites and Apps Team (Sources)