========================================== #fedora-blocker-review: F31-blocker-review ========================================== Meeting started by adamw at 16:02:22 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2019-09-16/f31-blocker-review.2019-09-16-16.02.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (adamw, 16:02:23) * Introduction (adamw, 16:04:55) * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (adamw, 16:04:56) * We'll be following the process outlined at: (adamw, 16:04:56) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (adamw, 16:04:56) * The bugs up for review today are available at: (adamw, 16:04:57) * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (adamw, 16:04:59) * The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (adamw, 16:05:01) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Basic_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:05:03) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Beta_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:05:05) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Final_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:05:07) * coremodule will secretarialize (adamw, 16:05:09) * for Final, we have: (adamw, 16:05:20) * 7 Proposed Blockers (adamw, 16:05:25) * 6 Accepted Blockers (adamw, 16:05:25) * 1 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (adamw, 16:05:28) * let's get started with proposed blockers (adamw, 16:08:51) * (1751673) Second user gets locked out of his session every ~10 seconds (adamw, 16:08:58) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751673 (adamw, 16:08:58) * Proposed Blocker, gdm, NEW (adamw, 16:08:58) * AGREED: 1751673 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - this is accepted as a violation of "All elements of the default panel (or equivalent) configuration in all release-blocking desktops must function correctly in typical use" (adamw, 16:16:15) * (1750805) Apply button stays gray on Network configuration (adamw, 16:16:23) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750805 (adamw, 16:16:24) * Proposed Blocker, gnome-control-center, NEW (adamw, 16:16:24) * AGREED: 1750805 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - this is accepted as a violation of "All elements of the default panel (or equivalent) configuration in all release-blocking desktops must function correctly in typical use." (adamw, 16:19:00) * (1749868) GNOME Software doesn't prepare offline updates (adamw, 16:19:10) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749868 (adamw, 16:19:10) * Proposed Blocker, gnome-software, NEW (adamw, 16:19:10) * fesco has asked dnf to revert the change that appears to be causing it (bcotton, 16:20:26) * AGREED: 1749868 - punt (delay decision) - we believe the reversion of the DNF skip_if_unavailable default to True should mean this is no longer a big enough problem to be a blocker, we will confirm this once the reversion is done (adamw, 16:25:59) * (1747408) Cannot upgrade to Fedora 31: package exa-0.9.0-2.module_f31+5365+04413d87.x86_64 requires libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed (adamw, 16:33:50) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747408 (adamw, 16:33:50) * Proposed Blocker, libgit2, NEW (adamw, 16:33:50) * AGREED: 1747408 - RejectedBlocker (Final) AcceptedFreezeException (Final) - we reject this as a Final blocker for the same reason we rejected it for Beta: it does not affect any release-blocking default package set, so does not break the criteria. But it's definitely a bad bug and we'd like it resolved if at all possible, and documented if it is not resolved (adamw, 16:48:48) * (1750036) Problem with time syncronization (adamw, 16:50:01) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750036 (adamw, 16:50:02) * Proposed Blocker, selinux-policy, ASSIGNED (adamw, 16:50:02) * AGREED: 1750036 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - this is accepted as a blocker with reference to multiple criteria: default panel functionality (as this affects time configuration), system services (as the service does not really start 'properly'), and domain-related criteria (as lack of time synchronization will often break domain authentication) (adamw, 16:55:01) * adamw is a legend (kparal, 16:55:22) * (1750345) [abrt] gnome-initial-setup: webkitWebViewBaseMakeGLContextCurrent(): gnome-initial-setup killed by SIGSEGV (adamw, 16:55:29) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750345 (adamw, 16:55:29) * Proposed Blocker, webkit2gtk3, NEW (adamw, 16:55:29) * AGREED: 1750345 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - this is accepted as a violation of "All elements of the default panel (or equivalent) configuration in all release-blocking desktops must function correctly in typical use" (adamw, 17:00:30) * (1751852) Xfce is using upstream desktop background (adamw, 17:00:37) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751852 (adamw, 17:00:37) * Proposed Blocker, xfdesktop, ON_QA (adamw, 17:00:37) * AGREED: 1751852 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - this is accepted as a violation of "The proposed final Fedora artwork must be included and used as the background on release-blocking desktops..." (adamw, 17:04:41) * Proposed Final freeze exception (adamw, 17:05:18) * (1751936) Google account shows just empty window (adamw, 17:05:27) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751936 (adamw, 17:05:27) * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, gnome-online-accounts, NEW (adamw, 17:05:28) * AGREED: 1751936 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - we accept this as a *blocker*, not just an FE, as a violation of "All elements of the default panel (or equivalent) configuration in all release-blocking desktops must function correctly in typical use" (adamw, 17:11:52) * Accepted blockers (adamw, 17:12:43) * most of these are in a fairly straightforward state and don't need particular followup (adamw, 17:12:54) * (1728240) Cannot start Fedora-KDE-Live (F31) in basic graphics mode on BIOS machine (adamw, 17:13:33) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1728240 (adamw, 17:13:33) * Accepted Blocker, sddm, NEW (adamw, 17:13:33) * ACTION: frantisekz and lruzicka to further investigate on this bug (sddm (and possibly gdm?) issues with basic graphics mode) (adamw, 17:17:22) * Open floor (adamw, 17:18:25) Meeting ended at 17:25:02 UTC. Action Items ------------ * frantisekz and lruzicka to further investigate on this bug (sddm (and possibly gdm?) issues with basic graphics mode) Action Items, by person ----------------------- * frantisekz * frantisekz and lruzicka to further investigate on this bug (sddm (and possibly gdm?) issues with basic graphics mode) * lruzicka * frantisekz and lruzicka to further investigate on this bug (sddm (and possibly gdm?) issues with basic graphics mode) * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * adamw (132) * kparal (74) * frantisekz (74) * lruzicka (46) * sgallagh (35) * bcotton (26) * coremodule (21) * zodbot (14) * pwhalen (12) * Southern_Gentlem (5) * satellit_ (2) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot