========================================== #fedora-blocker-review: F31-blocker-review ========================================== Meeting started by adamw at 16:00:59 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2019-08-26/f31-blocker-review.2019-08-26-16.00.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (adamw, 16:00:59) * Introduction (adamw, 16:07:11) * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (adamw, 16:07:11) * We'll be following the process outlined at: (adamw, 16:07:11) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (adamw, 16:07:13) * The bugs up for review today are available at: (adamw, 16:07:14) * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (adamw, 16:07:16) * The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (adamw, 16:07:18) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Basic_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:07:20) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Beta_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:07:22) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Final_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:07:24) * coremodule will secretarialize (adamw, 16:07:28) * for Beta we have: (adamw, 16:07:43) * 3 Proposed Blockers (adamw, 16:07:43) * 1 Accepted Blockers (adamw, 16:07:44) * 2 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (adamw, 16:07:48) * for Final we have: (adamw, 16:07:51) * 1 Proposed Blockers (adamw, 16:07:57) * let's start with proposed Beta blockers (adamw, 16:08:13) * (1727904) Network configuration based on boot option is not passed to installed system. (adamw, 16:08:20) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1727904 (adamw, 16:08:20) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (adamw, 16:08:20) * AGREED: 1727904 - RejectedBlocker (Beta) AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - this is a regression from previous releases and will be a problem for some users, but it won't be an issue in most cases as DHCP discovery is most common, and for cases where manual network config is needed, can be worked around by adding kickstart or UI configuration (adamw, 16:25:32) * (1744266) Fedora 31 still using Fedora 30 backgrounds (adamw, 16:25:55) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744266 (adamw, 16:25:55) * Proposed Blocker, desktop-backgrounds, NEW (adamw, 16:25:55) * AGREED: 1744266 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - this is a clear violation of Basic criterion "The default desktop background must be different from that of the last two stable releases." (adamw, 16:28:16) * (1743005) after upgrade gnome-shell from 3.33.2-1.fc31 to 3.33.3-1.fc31 stop working layout switching in X session (adamw, 16:28:26) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743005 (adamw, 16:28:27) * Proposed Blocker, gnome-shell, NEW (adamw, 16:28:27) * AGREED: 1743005 - RejectedBlocker (Beta) AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - as described both these issues are annoying but do not violate the criteria. We tested in-meeting that configuring the layout switch key combo via the Control Center works in both Wayland and X11. FE is granted to any confirmed layout switching config issue with tweak-tool (adamw, 16:38:35) * Proposed Final blocker (adamw, 16:39:02) * let's do the proposed Final blocker before circling back to Beta FEs (adamw, 16:39:14) * (1743753) blivet.errors.FormatCreateError: (FSError('format failed: 1'), '/dev/mapper/fedora_vm54-00') (adamw, 16:39:21) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743753 (adamw, 16:39:21) * Proposed Blocker, python-blivet, POST (adamw, 16:39:22) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744354 is my dupe with a bit more detail (adamw, 16:40:32) * AGREED: 1743753 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - this is accepted as a violation of Final criterion "The installer must be able to create and install to any workable partition layout using any file system and/or container format combination offered in a default installer configuration." (adamw, 16:44:38) * Proposed Beta freeze exceptions (adamw, 16:44:46) * we're getting close enough to freeze that it's probably worth reviewing these now, so here we go! (adamw, 16:44:58) * actually scratch that, they were both discussed as proposed blockers already (adamw, 16:45:17) * Accepted Beta blockers (adamw, 16:45:36) * (1734179) Cannot be installed due to unsatisfied 'bitfrost' dependency (adamw, 16:45:57) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1734179 (adamw, 16:45:58) * Accepted Blocker, dracut-modules-olpc, NEW (adamw, 16:45:58) * ACTION: adamw to make sure releng folks look at this with an eye to changing the pungi config (adamw, 16:48:14) * Open floor (adamw, 16:50:17) * Proposed Beta blockers, redux (adamw, 16:51:29) * a wild "new proposed Beta blocker" appeared! (adamw, 16:51:42) * (1745554) GDM dies after the user has logged out of Gnome Desktop. (adamw, 16:51:53) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1745554 (adamw, 16:51:53) * Proposed Blocker, gdm, NEW (adamw, 16:51:53) * AGREED: 1745554 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - as described this is accepted as a violation of Beta criterion "Shutting down, logging out and rebooting must work using standard console commands and the mechanisms offered (if any) by all release-blocking desktops", as this presents to the user as logout not working correctly (adamw, 16:54:35) * Open floor (take 2) (adamw, 16:55:03) Meeting ended at 17:10:36 UTC. Action Items ------------ * adamw to make sure releng folks look at this with an eye to changing the pungi config Action Items, by person ----------------------- * adamw * adamw to make sure releng folks look at this with an eye to changing the pungi config * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * adamw (157) * Lailah (59) * coremodule (37) * kparal (32) * lruzicka (25) * pwhalen (20) * jlanda (16) * zodbot (15) * bcotton (11) * jlinton (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot