Our purpose in this meeting is to review
proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept
them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted
blocker and nice-to-have bugs.(adamw,
16:05:58)
We'll be following the process outlined
at:(adamw,
16:05:58)
AGREED: 1615586 -
AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - accepted as a violation of Basic criterion
"It must be possible to configure a Fedora Server system installed
according to the above criteria as a FreeIPA domain controller,
using the official deployment tools provided in the distribution
FreeIPA packages. Once deployed, the system must handle multiple
client enrolments and unenrolments, and client authentication via
Kerberos..."(adamw,
16:14:27)
(1596540) RuntimeError: C++ std::exception: Exec failed: no such table: main.trans_cmdline(adamw, 16:14:46)
AGREED: 1596540 -
punt - we are worried about this and similar bugs that seem to
affect some but not other users on upgrade to DNF 3, but do not have
sufficient information yet to make a good decision on whether they
should be blockers. we will directly request evaluation of this by
dnf team and discuss it again after that(adamw,
16:26:31)
(1598336) dnf no longer understands its repository configuration(adamw, 16:26:43)
AGREED: 1598336 -
RejectedBlocker (Beta) AcceptedBlocker (Final) - we agreed that this
is a conditional violation of "The installed system must be able
appropriately to install, remove, and update software with the
default console tool for the relevant software type (e.g. default
console package manager)...", affecting Swedish installs (and
possibly others) and that using LC_ALL is an acceptable workaround
for Beta but not for Final(adamw,
16:36:02)
(1616118) DNF update fails with "cannot install the best update candidate for package"(adamw, 16:36:35)
AGREED: 1616118 -
RejectedBlocker (Beta) AcceptedBlocker (Final) - this bug seems
mostly cosmetic, it doesn't actually cause any packages to be
wrongly updated (or not updated), but it's likely to affect many
users and looks bad. We agreed it is a Final blocker as a
conditional violation of "The installed system must be able
appropriately to install, remove, and update software with the
default console tool for the relevant software type"(adamw,
16:47:38)
(1616167) dnf doesn't record modular metadata in a local database(adamw, 16:47:48)
AGREED: 1616167 -
AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - this is accepted as a violation of "The
installed system must be able appropriately to install, remove, and
update software with the default console tool for the relevant
software type", as it is means an update may be inappropriately
installed in a not too unusual scenario(adamw,
16:58:51)
(1601479) Packaging issues with outdated hub.docker.com fedora:rawhide containers(adamw, 16:59:06)
AGREED: 1601479 -
RejectedBlocker (Beta) - with latest information it's clear this is
to do with outdated container images on the docker.com hub, there is
no reason to block Fedora 29 release on it (though obviously we
should ensure those images are updated more often)(adamw,
17:03:19)
(1618928) grub2-2.02-50.fc29 shows error/debug messages in pager on x86_64, requires user input to complete boot(adamw, 17:03:28)
AGREED: 1619295 -
AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - violation of "For each one of the
release-blocking package sets, it must be possible to successfully
complete a direct upgrade from a fully updated, clean default
installation of each of the last two stable Fedora releases with
that package set installed. ... The upgraded system must include all
packages that would be present on the system after a default
installation from install media..."(adamw,
17:17:28)
(1616269) [abrt] xorg-x11-server-Xwayland: OsLookupColor(): Display server crashed(adamw, 17:17:35)
AGREED: 1616269 -
punt (delay decision) - we're not yet sure of just how many systems
are likely to be affected by this, we need to figure out more
precisely what the affected configurations are. sgallagh has
volunteered to try and gather some more data by next week(adamw,
17:26:18)
moving on to the proposed Beta FE(adamw,
17:26:37)
(1616118) DNF update fails with "cannot install the best update candidate for package"(adamw, 17:26:56)
AGREED: 1616118 -
AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - as well as being a Final blocker,
it makes sense for this to have an FE for Beta, we certainly would
like it fixed if it can safely be fixed.(adamw,
17:34:14)