Our purpose in this meeting is to review
proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept
them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted
blocker and nice-to-have bugs.(adamw,
16:05:23)
We'll be following the process outlined
at:(adamw,
16:05:23)
AGREED: 1582524 -
AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - accepted as a violation of Basic criterion
"The installed system must be able to download and install
appropriate updates with the default console tool for the relevant
update type (e.g. default console package manager)", in a fairly
simple module stream configuration(adamw,
16:26:16)
(1600823) NetworkManager sometimes fails to start due to 'ordering cycle' problem(adamw, 16:26:29)
AGREED: 1600823 -
AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - accepted as a violation of all
network-dependent criteria (e.g. updates, browser...) in the case
where this prevents NetworkManager from starting(adamw,
16:33:37)
(1601479) gdbm-libs 1.16 fails to install on Rawhide/F29(adamw, 16:33:42)
AGREED: 1601479 -
punt (delay decision) - from some preliminary investigation during
the meeting this one doesn't seem clear cut and it does not actually
seem to be breaking upgrade tests, so sgallagh will look into it
further before we make any decision(adamw,
16:50:37)
(1600848) Build a new release with modularity support(adamw, 16:50:46)
AGREED: 1600848 -
AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - as
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ModulesForEveryone is
accepted for F29 and means modules will be enabled for all installs,
this is accepted as a Beta blocker as a violation of Beta criterion
"The installed system must be able to download and install
appropriate updates with the default tool for the relevant update
type in all release-blocking desktops"(adamw,
17:07:17)
AGREED: 1600690 -
AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - this is accepted as a violation of the
Basic criterion "After system installation without explicit firewall
configuration, the system firewall must be active on all
non-loopback interfaces"(adamw,
17:17:13)
no other proposed blockers or FEs and no
accepted Beta blockers really need review(adamw,
17:18:22)