f29-blocker-review
MINUTES

#fedora-blocker-review: F29-blocker-review

Meeting started by adamw at 16:01:09 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

  1. Roll Call (adamw, 16:01:09)
  2. Introduction (adamw, 16:05:23)
    1. Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (adamw, 16:05:23)
    2. We'll be following the process outlined at: (adamw, 16:05:23)
    3. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (adamw, 16:05:26)
    4. The bugs up for review today are available at: (adamw, 16:05:26)
    5. http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (adamw, 16:05:28)
    6. The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (adamw, 16:05:30)
    7. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Basic_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:05:32)
    8. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Beta_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:05:34)
    9. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Final_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:05:38)
    10. 5 Proposed Blockers (adamw, 16:10:02)
    11. 4 Accepted Blockers (adamw, 16:10:02)
    12. 1 Accepted Freeze Exceptions (adamw, 16:10:05)
    13. lruzicka will secretarialize (adamw, 16:13:59)

  3. (1582524) dnf doesn't follow default profile for an enabled non-default stream (adamw, 16:14:11)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582524 (adamw, 16:14:12)
    2. Proposed Blocker, dnf, NEW (adamw, 16:14:12)
    3. AGREED: 1582524 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - accepted as a violation of Basic criterion "The installed system must be able to download and install appropriate updates with the default console tool for the relevant update type (e.g. default console package manager)", in a fairly simple module stream configuration (adamw, 16:26:16)

  4. (1600823) NetworkManager sometimes fails to start due to 'ordering cycle' problem (adamw, 16:26:29)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1600823 (adamw, 16:26:29)
    2. Proposed Blocker, dnf, POST (adamw, 16:26:29)
    3. AGREED: 1600823 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - accepted as a violation of all network-dependent criteria (e.g. updates, browser...) in the case where this prevents NetworkManager from starting (adamw, 16:33:37)

  5. (1601479) gdbm-libs 1.16 fails to install on Rawhide/F29 (adamw, 16:33:42)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601479 (adamw, 16:33:42)
    2. Proposed Blocker, gdbm, NEW (adamw, 16:33:42)
    3. AGREED: 1601479 - punt (delay decision) - from some preliminary investigation during the meeting this one doesn't seem clear cut and it does not actually seem to be breaking upgrade tests, so sgallagh will look into it further before we make any decision (adamw, 16:50:37)

  6. (1600848) Build a new release with modularity support (adamw, 16:50:46)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1600848 (adamw, 16:50:46)
    2. Proposed Blocker, PackageKit, NEW (adamw, 16:50:46)
    3. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ModulesForEveryone (sgallagh, 16:59:47)
    4. AGREED: 1600848 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - as https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ModulesForEveryone is accepted for F29 and means modules will be enabled for all installs, this is accepted as a Beta blocker as a violation of Beta criterion "The installed system must be able to download and install appropriate updates with the default tool for the relevant update type in all release-blocking desktops" (adamw, 17:07:17)

  7. (1600690) selinux-policy denies all(?) iptables operations with iptables 1.8.0 (breaks firewalld) (adamw, 17:07:30)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1600690 (adamw, 17:07:30)
    2. Proposed Blocker, selinux-policy-targeted, POST (adamw, 17:07:31)
    3. AGREED: 1600690 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - this is accepted as a violation of the Basic criterion "After system installation without explicit firewall configuration, the system firewall must be active on all non-loopback interfaces" (adamw, 17:17:13)
    4. no other proposed blockers or FEs and no accepted Beta blockers really need review (adamw, 17:18:22)

  8. Open floo (adamw, 17:18:25)
  9. Open floor (adamw, 17:18:26)


Meeting ended at 17:35:28 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. (none)


People present (lines said)

  1. adamw (126)
  2. sgallagh (59)
  3. kparal (47)
  4. lruzicka (22)
  5. pwhalen (13)
  6. zodbot (13)
  7. frantisekz (6)
  8. lbrabec (5)
  9. bcotton (1)


Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.