Our purpose in this meeting is to review
proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept
them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted
blocker and nice-to-have bugs.(adamw,
16:02:28)
We'll be following the process outlined
at:(adamw,
16:02:28)
AGREED: 1369786 -
AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - clear violation of "All release-blocking
images must boot in their supported configurations. This criterion
differs from the similar Alpha criterion only in that it requires
all supported methods of writing a Fedora USB stick to work, not
just any single one" and "The installer must be able to complete an
installation to a single disk using automatic partitioning."(adamw,
16:07:59)
(1366793) Nothing obsoletes retired dnf-langpacks packages, breaks upgrade from Fedora 23 to 25+(adamw, 16:10:00)
the FPC ticket we filed on this -
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/645 - has been kicked to FESCo -
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1620(adamw,
16:12:02)
AGREED: 1366793 -
AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - the lack of a clear policy here makes the
decision somewhat difficult, but in the absence of a policy we hold
this to be a violation of "For each one of the release-blocking
package sets, it must be possible to successfully complete a direct
upgrade from fully updated installations of the last two stable
Fedora releases with that package set installed."(adamw,
16:15:36)
(1369492) mouse cursor coordinates are incorrect in VM under wayland, makes cursor unusable(adamw, 16:15:58)
AGREED: 1369492 -
AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - clearly violates "The release must be able
host virtual guest instances of the same release." combined with
multiple desktop criteria(adamw,
16:19:30)
(1026119) fails to unmount encrypted filesystem (/dev/mapper/luks-partition) containing /var/log on every shutdown(adamw, 16:19:38)
AGREED: 1026119 -
RejectedBlocker (Beta) - based on all available information this
affects only a corner case (encrypted separate /var partition) and
even when encountered appears not to have serious
consequences(adamw,
16:26:17)
moving on to proposed Final blockers(adamw,
16:26:52)
(1370118) Some fonts are missing on the netinst and dvd(adamw, 16:26:58)
AGREED: 1370118 -
AcceptedBlocker (Final) - clear violation of "The installer must
correctly display all sufficiently complete translations available
for use."(adamw,
16:30:44)
(1370889) libgweather "Failed to get METAR data: 404 Not Found"(adamw, 16:30:52)
AGREED: 1370889 -
AcceptedBlocker (Final) - this violates "All applications that can
be launched using the standard graphical mechanism of a
release-blocking desktop after a default installation of that
desktop must start successfully and withstand a basic functionality
test" in the case of gnome-weather (this is considered 'basic
functionality' of gnome-weather)(adamw,
16:35:11)
(1366004) [abrt] setroubleshoot-server: service.py:647:_message_cb:SystemError: <built-in function isinstance> returned a result with an error set(adamw, 16:35:20)
AGREED: 1366004 -
RejectedBlocker (Final) - so far this doesn't seem to be a crash on
boot (thus does not violate cited criterion) and also doesn't seem
reliably reproducible on regular use of the sealert app (thus
doesn't violate 'basic functionality' criterion for pre-installed
apps). can be reproposed if more details emerge(adamw,
16:51:07)
(1295031) cannot preview files under wayland/XWayland(adamw, 16:51:13)
AGREED: 1295031 -
RejectedBlocker (Final) This is niche functionality that doesn't
quite pass the bar of "basic funcionality" for default-installed
applications.(adamw,
17:00:32)
(1370136) glibc update corrupts display of a running system(adamw, 17:00:56)
AGREED: 1370136 -
punt (delay decision) - we don't have a clear vote on this at
present and it's likely to be resolved long before Final in any
case, so we're delaying it for now(adamw,
17:26:58)
going back to a newly-proposed Beta
blocker(adamw,
17:27:28)
(1225184) anaconda does not detect RAID devices(adamw, 17:27:31)
AGREED: 1225184 -
AcceptedBlocker (Final) - as this is reproducible with clean disk
images it seems like a violation of "When using the custom
partitioning flow, the installer must be able to correctly
interpret...any disk with a valid ms-dos or gpt disk label and
partition table containing ext4 partitions, LVM and/or btrfs
volumes, and/or software RAID arrays at RAID levels 0, 1 and 5
containing ext4 partitions" for live images(adamw,
17:49:24)