#fedora-blocker-review: F24-blocker-review

Meeting summary

1. Roll Call (adamw, 16:04:32)
   
2. Introduction (adamw, 16:10:58)
   1. Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (adamw, 16:10:59)
   2. We'll be following the process outlined at: (adamw, 16:10:59)
   3. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (adamw, 16:10:59)
   4. The bugs up for review today are available at: (adamw, 16:11:00)
   5. http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (adamw, 16:11:02)
   6. The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (adamw, 16:11:04)
   7. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Alpha_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:11:06)
   8. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Beta_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:11:08)
   9. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Final_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:11:12)
   10. pschindl to secretarialize (adamw, 16:12:19)
   11. 3 Proposed Blockers (adamw, 16:13:03)
   12. 3 Accepted Blockers (adamw, 16:13:04)
   13. 4 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (adamw, 16:13:04)
   14. 13 Accepted Freeze Exceptions (adamw, 16:13:04)
   
   
3. (1344512) [UEFI][DELL Precison M6800] unable to boot Windows 10 - no shim lock protocol (adamw, 16:13:13)
   1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344512 (adamw, 16:13:13)
   2. Proposed Blocker, grub2, ON_QA (adamw, 16:13:13)
   3. AGREED: 1344512 - RejectedBlocker - from current data this seems to have been a sort of transient bug dating back to F22 UEFI boot manager configuration, no solid indication that it violates the criteria (adamw, 16:20:26)
   
   
4. (1344812) Package must be updated for F24 final (adamw, 16:21:02)
   1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344812 (adamw, 16:21:02)
   2. Proposed Blocker, spin-kickstarts, ON_QA (adamw, 16:21:02)
   3. AGREED: 1344812 - AcceptedBlocker - this is an obvious violation of "A spin-kickstarts package which contains the exact kickstart files used to build the release must be present in the release repository. The included kickstarts must define the correct set of release repositories." (adamw, 16:24:49)
   
   
5. (1344863) AttributeError: 'Iso9660FS' object has no attribute 'partitions' (adamw, 16:24:55)
   1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344863 (adamw, 16:24:55)
   2. Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (adamw, 16:24:55)
   3. AGREED: 1344863 - AcceptedBlocker - this appears to completely prevent install from USB media, which is a clear violation of "The installer must be able to complete an installation using any supported locally connected storage interface" (Alpha criterion) in the case of a USB install medium, which we consider more than sufficient to constitute a violation (adamw, 16:32:39)
   4. nothing of interest about the accepted blockers, all look to be properly addressed (adamw, 16:33:22)
   5. moving onto proposed FEs (adamw, 16:33:41)
   
   
6. (1342654) Got an error from DNF about the 'logging' function (adamw, 16:33:45)
   1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342654 (adamw, 16:33:45)
   2. Proposed Freeze Exceptions, anaconda, NEW (adamw, 16:33:45)
   3. AGREED: 1342654 - AcceptedFreezeException - not having deprecation warnings in the installer is good, I guess? (adamw, 16:48:53)
   
   
7. (1341333) Do not build for arm because of broken deps (adamw, 16:49:04)
   1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341333 (adamw, 16:49:04)
   2. Proposed Freeze Exceptions, golang-github-mistifyio-go-zfs, ON_QA (adamw, 16:49:04)
   3. AGREED: 1341333 - AcceptedFreezeException - this change fixes dependency issues in the base repo and doesn't look to have any possible impact on release quality (adamw, 16:52:10)
   
   
8. (1293167) [abrt] kf5-kinit: qt_message_fatal(): kdeinit5 killed by SIGABRT (adamw, 16:52:14)
   1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293167 (adamw, 16:52:14)
   2. Proposed Freeze Exceptions, kf5-kinit, NEW (adamw, 16:52:15)
   3. AGREED: 1293167 - RejectedFreezeException - it's now quite late in the F24 process and there is still no indication of how any fix for this might look, and the issue mostly affects installed systems in any case, so there's no clear case to accept it (adamw, 17:04:48)
   
   
9. (1344472) no focus for panel elements if using crtl-alt-tab (adamw, 17:04:55)
   1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344472 (adamw, 17:04:56)
   2. Proposed Freeze Exceptions, mate-panel, ON_QA (adamw, 17:04:56)
   3. AGREED: 1344472 - AcceptedFreezeException - this is clearly a significant issue that cannot be fixed with a post-release update, it is in a non-blocking desktop so cannot endanger the release (adamw, 17:07:50)
   
   
10. Open floor (adamw, 17:08:02)

Action items

1. (none)

People present (lines said)

1. adamw (124)
2. nirik (25)
3. garretraziel (21)
4. coremodule (21)
5. danofsatx (18)
6. pschindl (14)
7. pwhalen (13)
8. zodbot (5)
9. zdzichu (3)