f24-blocker-review
MINUTES

#fedora-blocker-review: F24-blocker-review

Meeting started by adamw at 16:05:11 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

  1. Roll Call (adamw, 16:05:12)
  2. Introduction (adamw, 16:12:02)
    1. Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (adamw, 16:12:02)
    2. We'll be following the process outlined at: (adamw, 16:12:02)
    3. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (adamw, 16:12:04)
    4. The bugs up for review today are available at: (adamw, 16:12:04)
    5. http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (adamw, 16:12:06)
    6. The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (adamw, 16:12:09)
    7. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Alpha_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:12:11)
    8. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Beta_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:12:13)
    9. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Final_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:12:16)
    10. pschindl to secretarialize (adamw, 16:15:11)

  3. (1318067) [anaconda] non-bootable system after fresh install of current F24 on bare metal (adamw, 16:16:13)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318067 (adamw, 16:16:13)
    2. Proposed Blocker, grub2, NEW (adamw, 16:16:13)
    3. AGREED: 1318067 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - this is a conditional violation of "A system installed without a graphical package set must boot to a state where it is possible to log in through at least one of the default virtual consoles." and from the info gathered it seems significant enough of a violation to accept as a blocker (adamw, 16:27:22)

  4. (1323511) hibernate action results in a shutdown (adamw, 16:27:28)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323511 (adamw, 16:27:28)
    2. Proposed Blocker, kernel, NEW (adamw, 16:27:28)
    3. AGREED: 1323511 - RejectedBlocker (Beta) - the criteria do not cover hibernation and this is intentional, it's not considered release-blocking functionality (due to the difficulty of making it work reliably). it's also not really supported in VMs anyhow. (adamw, 16:37:11)

  5. (1293167) [abrt] kf5-kinit: qt_message_fatal(): kdeinit5 killed by SIGABRT (adamw, 16:37:19)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293167 (adamw, 16:37:19)
    2. Proposed Blocker, kf5-kinit, NEW (adamw, 16:37:20)
    3. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Beta_Release_Criteria#Desktop_panel (kparal, 16:40:02)
    4. AGREED: 1293167 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - we count this as a conditional violation of "...logging out...must work using...the mechanisms offered (if any) by all release-blocking desktops." As it's conditional and affects a more advanced use case we accept it as a Final blocker rather than Beta, but also as a Beta freeze exception issue. (adamw, 16:47:55)

  6. (1321393) blivet.errors.DeviceTreeError: no slaves found for device md127 (adamw, 16:48:18)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321393 (adamw, 16:48:18)
    2. Proposed Blocker, python-blivet, NEW (adamw, 16:48:18)
    3. AGREED: 1321393 - punt (delay decision) - this looks worrying, but we need more information: from the reporters on whether they had an actual valid RAID set or just disks with stale RAID metadata, and from blivet and/or mdadm developers on what the problem looks like from their end (adamw, 17:00:25)
    4. we have no proposed Final blockers at this point (adamw, 17:00:40)
    5. moving onto accepted Beta blockers (adamw, 17:01:22)

  7. (1259865) call `dnf mark install <pkgs...>`on packages installed from PK (adamw, 17:01:53)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259865 (adamw, 17:01:53)
    2. Accepted Blocker, PackageKit, NEW (adamw, 17:01:53)
    3. this was accepted back in February and no progress seems to have been made (adamw, 17:02:28)
    4. ACTION: kparal to poke GNOME Software / PK folks and try to get some movement on this bug (adamw, 17:04:58)

  8. (1306808) blivet.errors.FSError: mount failed: 32 (adamw, 17:05:47)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306808 (adamw, 17:05:48)
    2. Accepted Blocker, anaconda, NEW (adamw, 17:05:48)
    3. ACTION: adamw to very diplomatically raise this bug with anaconda team (adamw, 17:06:23)

  9. (1262556) AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'get_data' (adamw, 17:08:29)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262556 (adamw, 17:08:29)
    2. Accepted Blocker, NetworkManager, NEW (adamw, 17:08:29)
    3. this one has a needinfo from a dev, so we should get on that (adamw, 17:08:36)

  10. Open floor (adamw, 17:10:13)


Meeting ended at 17:13:32 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. kparal to poke GNOME Software / PK folks and try to get some movement on this bug
  2. adamw to very diplomatically raise this bug with anaconda team


Action items, by person

  1. adamw
    1. adamw to very diplomatically raise this bug with anaconda team
  2. kparal
    1. kparal to poke GNOME Software / PK folks and try to get some movement on this bug


People present (lines said)

  1. adamw (134)
  2. kparal (46)
  3. handsome_pirate (34)
  4. Southern_Gentlem (17)
  5. jpigface (12)
  6. pschindl (11)
  7. pwhalen (10)
  8. dgilmore (8)
  9. zodbot (7)
  10. satellit_e (1)


Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.