18:01:45 <nirik> #startmeeting Fedora Infrastructure Ops Daily Standup Meeting
18:01:45 <zodbot> Meeting started Thu May 28 18:01:45 2020 UTC.
18:01:45 <zodbot> This meeting is logged and archived in a public location.
18:01:45 <zodbot> The chair is nirik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
18:01:45 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
18:01:45 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting'
18:01:45 <nirik> #chair cverna mboddu nirik smooge
18:01:45 <zodbot> Current chairs: cverna mboddu nirik smooge
18:01:45 <nirik> #meetingname fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting
18:01:45 <nirik> #info meeting is 30 minutes MAX. At the end of 30, its stops
18:01:45 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting'
18:01:46 <nirik> #info agenda is at https://board.net/p/fedora-infra-daily
18:01:47 <nirik> #topic Tickets needing review
18:01:48 <nirik> #info https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues?status=Open&priority=1
18:01:56 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- dustymabe commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8962: "new robosignatory release/deploy with coreos patches" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8962#comment-655161
18:02:20 <nirik> who all is around?
18:02:45 <smooge> i am
18:03:08 * dustymabe lurks
18:03:56 <nirik> ok
18:04:02 <nirik> .ticket 8955
18:04:03 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8955: 'fedpkg update' does not work - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8955
18:04:16 <nirik> I think this is closable now. let me confirm the bodhi pods are still ok
18:04:45 <nirik> yeah, running 6 hours and I think new submissions are working fine.
18:04:54 <nirik> we cloud also wait for cverna to confirm
18:04:55 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.assigned.added -- smooge assigned ticket fedora-infrastructure#8959 to smooge https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8959
18:05:58 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- smooge commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8959: "The s390x Koji builders are extraordinary slow" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8959#comment-655163
18:05:58 <nirik> I guess close it and ask them to reopen if it's still happening?
18:06:07 <nirik> smooge: you want to modify tickets today?
18:06:12 <smooge> yep
18:06:24 <nirik> thanks
18:06:34 <nirik> .ticket 8958
18:06:35 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8958: Please issue Access keys (access key ID and secret access key) to AWS - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8958
18:06:54 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- smooge edited the close_status and status fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8955 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8955
18:06:55 <nirik> so... I thought I already sent them to someone, let me look.
18:06:55 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- smooge commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8955: "'fedpkg update' does not work" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8955#comment-655164
18:07:47 <smooge> there was also an email to admin
18:08:00 <nirik> I need a cheet sheet for all the ci groups. ;)
18:08:41 <smooge> sorry infrastructure
18:09:12 <nirik> ok. I issued one to fedora-ci-testing-farm...
18:10:48 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.tag.added -- kevin tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#8958: aws https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8958
18:10:49 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- kevin edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8958 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8958
18:10:50 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- kevin commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8958: "Please issue Access keys (access key ID and secret access key) to AWS" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8958#comment-655166
18:10:56 <nirik> added some questions.
18:10:57 * pingou 
18:11:03 * mboddu is here
18:11:08 <nirik> .ticket 8960
18:11:09 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8960: Adjust playbooks/manual/staging-sync/templates/koji-reset-staging.sql script for phx2->iad2 koji migration - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8960
18:11:29 <nirik> this just needs doing. medium-effort, high-gain, groomed, waiting on asignee
18:11:46 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.tag.added -- smooge tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#8958: groomed https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8958
18:11:47 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- smooge edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8958 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8958
18:12:06 <nirik> .ticket 8961
18:12:07 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8961: Double mail from myfasname@fedoraproject.org - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8961
18:12:13 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.tag.added -- smooge tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#8960: groomed, medium-gain, and medium-trouble https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8960
18:12:14 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- smooge edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8960 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8960
18:12:44 <nirik> this may be some mailman thing if they are double subscribed? propose: low-gain, medium-effort, groomed, waiting on asignee
18:13:57 <nirik> acks?
18:14:03 <pingou> wfm
18:14:17 <pingou> though this one I don't know how to process it (or if I have the rights to)
18:15:08 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.tag.added -- smooge tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#8961: groomed, low-gain, and medium-trouble https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8961
18:15:09 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- smooge edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8961 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8961
18:15:10 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- smooge commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8961: "Double mail from myfasname@fedoraproject.org" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8961#comment-655174
18:15:11 <nirik> pingou: process it how?
18:15:25 <nirik> .ticket 8962
18:15:29 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8962: new robosignatory release/deploy with coreos patches - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8962
18:15:33 <smooge> I looked and they only have 1 alias set up.. I have asked for them to give copies of the emails
18:15:33 <pingou> how to check if it's a mailman thing, I guess it needs access to the mailman admin ui?
18:15:52 <nirik> pingou: ah, no, probibly just looking at logs and mail headers...
18:15:56 <pingou> ok
18:16:03 <pingou> let's wait for the emails then
18:16:21 <smooge> I would look to see in log01 and see if there are 'dupes' going to his two emails
18:16:26 <nirik> might be also a good one for mobrien[m] / jednorozec / siddharthvipul if they want something to investigate and learn more about the mail system.
18:16:50 <smooge> I don't know what their old email was
18:16:57 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- stefanberger commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8955: "'fedpkg update' does not work" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8955#comment-655185
18:17:00 <pingou> nirik: +1
18:17:53 <nirik> ok, this next one... If mboddu has time he could test the info I gave him on how to update autosign. ;) we also need abompard to review the patches...
18:18:14 <nirik> dustymabe: would monday be ok for this? tomorrow is day of learning for many...
18:18:21 <pingou> so for #43 I've tested in stg back then, so I'm ok with it
18:18:44 <pingou> #46 looks fine code wise
18:18:48 <nirik> cool. yeah,
18:19:38 <pingou> I think this shows the limit of having a single expert on an app
18:19:56 <nirik> so, move to medium gain, low trouble, waiting on asignee, groomed, and mention to abompard to review and mboddu to see if he can update monday?
18:19:58 <mboddu> nirik: Sure, we could give it a try
18:20:09 <nirik> pingou: yeah. agreed.
18:20:18 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.tag.added -- smooge tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#8962: groomed, low-trouble, and medium-gain https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8962
18:20:19 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- smooge edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8962 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8962
18:20:19 <mboddu> Yeah, I can try it on Monday
18:20:33 <nirik> mboddu: thanks. Hopefully thats soon enough
18:20:40 <smooge> dusty said he was out this week mostly
18:20:58 <smooge> so I expect Modnay works better
18:21:04 <nirik> ok, any releng tickets to discuss?
18:21:15 <mboddu> Yeah, side tag request
18:21:18 <pingou> the ideal target is next week Tue, but if it lands later it's ok (as long as it's before Jun 16th)
18:21:23 <mboddu> .releng 9485
18:21:24 <zodbot> mboddu: Issue #9485: f33-kde side tag - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9485
18:21:47 <mboddu> Its a low trouble, medium gain
18:21:57 <nirik> I don't think we want to have side tags depending on side tags.
18:22:13 <nirik> can't we just wait a bit since python is really close to merging?
18:22:31 <mboddu> nirik: But we could add both right? Giving preference to f33-python tag?
18:22:50 <mboddu> Yes, that is my plan if we dont want to use f33-python tag
18:23:21 <siddharthvipul> nirik: read the ticket and log, I will try to investigate on the mail system.. If there is a resource/doc focused on our Infra around mail system, do share :)
18:23:27 <siddharthvipul> Thank you :)
18:23:30 <mboddu> I will ask in the ticket if they wait until python stack is merged back, if not then we can think about it
18:23:44 <mboddu> can wait*
18:23:51 <nirik> you mean make f33-kde inherit from f33-python which inhertis from f33-build? yes, in theory we could... but what do we do once we merge the python one?
18:24:22 <nirik> we would have to keep everything, but then it's old next to build, and then chaos and cats and dogs. :)
18:24:41 <mobrien[m]> siddharthvipul: I will work on that with you if that's OK. Get some familiarity with it
18:24:44 <nirik> I guess you can move the inherit.
18:24:47 <dustymabe> nirik: sorry I had stepped away - i'm back now
18:24:48 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- sagitter commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8961: "Double mail from myfasname@fedoraproject.org" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8961#comment-655194
18:24:55 <mboddu> nirik: Yeah, I can see your point
18:25:01 <nirik> anyhow, I think it would be much easier to just wait...
18:25:12 <siddharthvipul> mobrien[m]: more than okay, I am super happy tbh. Just a warning, I don't know anything around it
18:25:15 <dustymabe> nirik: monday would be great!
18:25:27 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- astepano commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8958: "Please issue Access keys (access key ID and secret access key) to AWS" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8958#comment-655196
18:25:31 <nirik> siddharthvipul / mobrien[m] cool. Might be something in infra docs, but log01.phx2.fedoraproject.org /var/log/merged/mail.log has all our mail logs...
18:25:39 <nirik> dustymabe: cool. thanks.
18:25:52 <mboddu> dustymabe: Awesome, thanks
18:26:11 <nirik> mboddu: any other releng ones?
18:26:24 <mboddu> nirik: I worked on the others already :D
18:26:49 <nirik> cool.
18:26:53 <siddharthvipul> nirik: noted, will explore :)
18:26:55 <mboddu> But, thats it
18:27:05 <dustymabe> nirik: who should I talk to on monday?
18:27:21 <nirik> dustymabe: mboddu will be doing it... he can let you know when it's done. :)
18:27:38 <nirik> I gave a dc move update in the infra meeting, not sure I need to repeat here. ;)
18:27:51 <nirik> any other tickets to discuss, blockers, etc?
18:28:01 <pingou> dustymabe: the person working on the ticket should assign it to themselves
18:28:02 <mboddu> dustymabe: That would be me, I will let you know when I start working on it on Monday
18:28:16 <dustymabe> +1
18:28:28 <mboddu> But abompard will be reviewing the changes and I will deploy the changes
18:29:47 <nirik> pingou: so, thats something I have bene pondering
18:30:04 <nirik> we have NOT been wanting to assign tickets to people until they are actually working on them
18:30:12 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- smooge commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8961: "Double mail from myfasname@fedoraproject.org" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8961#comment-655197
18:30:37 <nirik> because it means you have someone who assigns tickets when they hope to someday do them and they aren't really being worked on at all. ;(
18:30:57 <nirik> but I was pondering a better way to fix that this morning.
18:31:54 <smooge> running man ticket queue
18:32:11 <nirik> 1) let people assign tickets when they just plan to do it sometime/whatever, 2) add a 'in progress' state to our pagure trackers at least 3) adjust our dashboard to not look at asignee until the state is 'in progress'
18:32:34 <nirik> but not sure how that will work for bugzilla or github or whatever.
18:32:50 <nirik> anyhow we are over time. lets close and continue discussing?
18:33:17 * pingou pondering about nirik's idea, +1 to close
18:33:32 <nirik> #endmeeting