18:01:31 <cverna> #startmeeting Fedora Infrastructure Ops Daily Standup Meeting
18:01:31 <zodbot> Meeting started Wed Mar 25 18:01:31 2020 UTC.
18:01:31 <zodbot> This meeting is logged and archived in a public location.
18:01:31 <zodbot> The chair is cverna. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
18:01:31 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
18:01:31 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting'
18:01:31 <cverna> #chair cverna mboddu nirik smooge
18:01:31 <zodbot> Current chairs: cverna mboddu nirik smooge
18:01:44 <smooge> woops
18:01:45 <smooge> thanks
18:01:52 <cverna> #info meeting is 30 minutes MAX. At the end of 30, its stops
18:01:52 <cverna> #info agenda is at https://board.net/p/fedora-infra-daily
18:02:17 <cverna> #topic Tickets needing review
18:02:17 <cverna> #info https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues?status=Open&priority=1
18:03:04 <cverna> .ticket 8777
18:03:06 <zodbot> cverna: Issue #8777: [mailing lists] Update access and/or delete Ovc, Ovc-devel, Ovc-press - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8777
18:04:05 <smooge> cverna, sounds like it should be low-trouble mailman waiting on assignee
18:04:31 <cverna> agreed
18:04:32 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.tag.added -- smooge tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#8777: lists and low-trouble https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8777
18:04:33 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- smooge edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8777 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8777
18:04:56 <nirik> sorry, here now.
18:05:02 <cverna> .ticket 8780
18:05:03 <zodbot> cverna: Issue #8780: fedora-messaging certs for retrace-stg - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8780
18:05:23 * mboddu is here
18:05:28 <nirik> low trouble, medium gain, waiting on asignee
18:05:46 <cverna> this is should be low trouble too, and waiting on assignee
18:06:10 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.tag.added -- cverna tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#8780: low-trouble https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8780
18:06:11 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- cverna edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8780 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8780
18:06:17 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.tag.added -- smooge tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#8780: medium-gain https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8780
18:06:26 <smooge> oops sorry
18:06:37 <smooge> collision in mid-air
18:06:45 <cverna> I think that was all in the need review
18:06:49 <cverna> smooge:  no problem :)
18:06:56 * mboddu has some
18:07:04 <smooge> yeah I took the over the other ticket earlier today as it seemed urgent
18:07:08 <cverna> I think we go it right :)
18:07:13 <nirik> .ticket 8764
18:07:14 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8764: Allow creating side-tags and submit side-tag based updates for EPEL 8 - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8764
18:07:18 <nirik> is this done now cverna ^
18:08:00 <nirik> so, that leeds me to... should we come up with a generic/default definition of done for infra / releng tickets?
18:08:10 <cverna> Yeah the new bodhi should be able to handle normal releases side tag
18:08:30 <mboddu> nirik: Regarding what?
18:08:32 <nirik> sometimes we wait for reporter to confirm a fix/change... and the tickets stay open for a long time because people are crappy about coming and confirming
18:08:45 * mboddu now follows
18:08:46 <nirik> or should we close when we think it's fixed.
18:09:03 <nirik> or does it depend? I guess a subject for the list.
18:09:09 <cverna> I think we should close and ask people to reopen if needed
18:09:18 <nirik> yeah, thats what I was going for also
18:09:26 <mboddu> Whats the duration?
18:09:27 <nirik> so, lets close 8764
18:09:35 <mboddu> Anything that is not modified in a month?
18:09:37 <nirik> also, I think 8757 can be close.
18:09:44 <mboddu> Or a year?
18:09:52 <nirik> mboddu: then it's on us to go back and close after a month and it sits there in our head.
18:10:39 <nirik> I think our default should be... "I think this is fixed/solved/done. I am closing it. If you see something that still needs doing/isn't working, reopen it"
18:10:58 <mboddu> Okay
18:11:05 <cverna> Yeah that sounds good to me
18:11:25 <nirik> I want to close 8757 too.
18:11:28 <nirik> .ticket 8757
18:11:31 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8757: fedoraproject.org URI as XML namespace - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8757
18:11:41 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- kevin edited the close_status and status fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8757 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8757
18:11:42 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- kevin commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8757: "fedoraproject.org URI as XML namespace" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8757#comment-637585
18:11:48 <nirik> so I did.
18:12:29 <nirik> cverna: want to close 8764?
18:12:35 <nirik> any other tickets or blockers?
18:12:39 <cverna> on it
18:13:03 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- cverna edited the close_status and status fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8764 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8764
18:13:04 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- cverna commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8764: "Allow creating side-tags and submit side-tag based updates for EPEL 8" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8764#comment-637587
18:13:24 * nirik looks at recent releng ones
18:14:05 <nirik> 2 unretire requests. 2 fcos release requests.
18:14:11 <mboddu> .releng 9351
18:14:13 <zodbot> mboddu: Issue #9351: Cannot push FEDORA-2020-ad57ee8760 to stable - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9351
18:14:14 <nirik> and a f33 change review
18:14:25 <mboddu> I need to talk about it
18:14:38 <nirik> ah yeah...
18:14:40 <mboddu> cverna: qgis-3.12.0-2.fc32 is in a weird state
18:14:42 <nirik> still a tagging issue?
18:14:44 <mboddu> It wasn't signed
18:14:48 <mboddu> Right
18:14:57 <mboddu> Tue Mar 10 10:36:45 2020 qgis-3.12.0-2.fc32 tagged into f32-updates-candidate by smani [still active]
18:14:58 <mboddu> Sat Mar 21 21:46:45 2020 qgis-3.12.0-2.fc32 tagged into f32-updates-pending by bodhi
18:14:58 <mboddu> Sun Mar 22 21:40:16 2020 qgis-3.12.0-2.fc32 untagged from f32-updates-pending by bodhi
18:15:16 <mboddu> And it continued with lot of tagging and untaggings from update-pending tag
18:15:29 <mboddu> I fixed every other build
18:15:29 <nirik> huh. yeah, it needs to be signed still.
18:15:33 <cverna> all by bodhi ?
18:15:37 <mboddu> Yes
18:15:50 <nirik> that may be each time the update was edited
18:16:29 <cverna> ha I guess the tagging/untagging is the request to stable then the update being ejected
18:16:46 <mboddu> nirik: Not exactly, and also not during when it pushed - https://paste.centos.org/view/14d802a7
18:17:00 <nirik> ok, so we need to tag it into f32-signing-pending to get it signed?
18:18:10 <cverna> yes that should work
18:18:38 <nirik> give that a whirl mboddu
18:18:43 <mboddu> nirik: Yes, and then tag it to f32-updates-testing and run testing compose and request it to stable and run stable push
18:19:01 <nirik> ...and a partridge in a pear tree...
18:19:03 <mboddu> Since according to bodhi, the update is already in testing
18:19:12 <mboddu> Dont know how it skipped that build
18:20:05 <nirik> I think it ejected it everytime after that.
18:20:25 <nirik> anyhow, anything else for this meeting?
18:20:37 <mboddu> Not from me
18:20:57 * mboddu will sign the coreos artifacts in the afternoon
18:21:07 <nirik> thanks mboddu and everyone for coming.
18:21:12 <nirik> #endmeeting