fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting
LOGS
19:01:22 <nirik> #startmeeting Fedora Infrastructure Ops Daily Standup Meeting
19:01:22 <zodbot> Meeting started Mon Mar  2 19:01:22 2020 UTC.
19:01:22 <zodbot> This meeting is logged and archived in a public location.
19:01:22 <zodbot> The chair is nirik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
19:01:22 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
19:01:22 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting'
19:01:22 <nirik> #chair cverna mboddu nirik relrod smooge
19:01:22 <zodbot> Current chairs: cverna mboddu nirik relrod smooge
19:01:22 <nirik> #info meeting is 30 minutes MAX. At the end of 30, its stops
19:01:22 <nirik> #info agenda is at https://board.net/p/fedora-infra-daily
19:01:22 <nirik> #topic Tickets needing review
19:01:37 <smooge> sorry browser froze
19:01:44 <nirik> .ticket 8701
19:01:46 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8701: Bugzilla Editing Permissions Issue - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8701
19:02:01 <nirik> this is a dupe. let me fix that one user and close it as a duplicate to fix the script...
19:02:05 <cverna> hello o/
19:03:04 <nirik> zodbot: fasinfo imcinerney
19:03:05 <zodbot> nirik: User: imcinerney, Name: Ian McInerney, email: ian.s.mcinerney@ieee.org, Creation: 2019-06-16, IRC Nick: None, Timezone: UTC, Locale: en, GPG key ID: None, Status: active
19:03:08 <zodbot> nirik: Approved Groups: fedorabugs packager cla_done cla_fpca
19:04:36 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- kevin edited the close_status and status fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8701 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8701
19:04:37 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- kevin commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8701: "Bugzilla Editing Permissions Issue" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8701#comment-629856
19:04:44 <nirik> .ticket 8702
19:04:45 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8702: Renew or Retire Certificate for *.id.fedoraproject.org - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8702
19:04:54 <nirik> .ticket 8703
19:04:55 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8703: Renew or Retire Certificate for *.stg.id.fedoraproject.org - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8703
19:05:10 <nirik> I guess these just need moving to waiting on assignee and done?
19:05:29 <cverna> yes
19:05:31 <nirik> as long as we support openid, we need these I think
19:06:08 <nirik> smooge: you got those changes? or want me or cverna to?
19:06:13 <smooge> i am making them
19:06:21 <cverna> thanks smooge
19:06:24 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.tag.added -- smooge tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#8702: websites-general https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8702
19:06:25 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- smooge edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8702 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8702
19:06:31 <nirik> cool. thanks
19:06:37 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.tag.added -- smooge tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#8703: websites-general https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8703
19:06:38 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- smooge edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8703 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8703
19:06:46 <nirik> .ticket 8704
19:06:47 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8704: Need to backup/copy data from equallogics to storinator - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8704
19:07:03 <nirik> I guess we need to @ the copr folks here and find out exactly what they want.
19:07:30 <nirik> I can add questions, or smooge you want to take care of it?
19:07:45 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- smooge commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8704: "Need to backup/copy data from equallogics to storinator" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8704#comment-629861
19:07:54 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- smooge edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8704 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8704
19:08:07 <smooge> that cover the question you wanted nirik ?
19:08:19 <nirik> yep. exactly it. :)
19:09:06 <nirik> .ticket 8705
19:09:08 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8705: Rebuild fed-cloud12 to virthost-os01 (fed-cloud-13 to virthost-os02) - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8705
19:09:11 <smooge> ok 8705 I need to rewrite
19:09:30 <smooge> it is move stuff off of virthost-os01 to virthost-cloud01
19:09:35 <nirik> so I guess this becomes: move os-proxy01/02 to virthost-cloud01?
19:10:10 <smooge> we could rebuild fed-cloud15 to be a virthost-cloud02
19:10:25 <nirik> what did you want to do with virthost-os03?
19:10:39 <smooge> I have it that it is going to RDU
19:11:08 <nirik> ok.
19:11:14 <smooge> it is an R630
19:11:15 <nirik> is 15 a 630?
19:11:28 <smooge> 12/13/15 are all 630's
19:11:36 <nirik> well, were...
19:11:55 <nirik> anyhow.
19:12:13 <smooge> so 15 could become cloud02 or os02
19:12:17 <smooge> and cloud01 could be os01
19:12:26 <nirik> I'm fine rebuilding 15 to cloud02, or rebuilding virthost-os03 to cloud03
19:12:28 <smooge> i wasn't sure how those names needed to be mapped
19:12:33 <smooge> ok I can do that
19:12:39 <smooge> I will alter the ticket to match that
19:12:55 <nirik> I called those two for 'openshift' but if we want to make them more generic for other stuff...
19:13:06 <nirik> cloud of course is a bit of a misnomer.
19:13:12 <nirik> naming things is hard
19:13:45 <nirik> virthost-nz01 and virthost-nz02... the neutral zone!
19:14:36 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- smooge edited the content and title fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8705 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8705
19:14:39 <nirik> anyhow, moving on I guess?
19:14:47 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- smooge edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8705 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8705
19:15:05 <smooge> will rename them for new zealand
19:15:15 <nirik> whats the virthost-cloud01 box now? is that a 630?
19:15:28 <smooge> it is the r630 which was for the koji-s390
19:15:35 <nirik> it is
19:15:38 <nirik> ah, ok
19:15:52 <smooge> so it would be made into virthost-cc-rdu04/05/06
19:15:57 <nirik> we need really only 2 of them there... if we want communishift HA
19:16:06 <smooge> after we move stuff to CC
19:16:24 <nirik> yeah, would some of those better go to iad2?
19:16:35 <smooge> quite likely
19:16:57 <smooge> I was confused that the openshift needed hardware control for those proxies
19:17:03 <nirik> so we have 1 extra r630 right?
19:17:09 <smooge> so I had assumed they needed to be full access
19:17:14 <nirik> yeah, they can be/are vm's
19:17:38 <nirik> I just wanted them on different boxes in case one died.
19:17:48 <smooge> ok in that case, one can go on virthost-cc-rdu01 one can go on virthost-cc-rdu03 and virthost-cloud can become virthost-cc-rdu04
19:18:29 <smooge> fed-cloud12/13/15 and virthost-os03 can then go to IAD
19:18:42 <nirik> ok. sounds good.
19:18:59 <smooge> will make the changes to the email I was going to send out shortly
19:19:28 <smooge> next ticket?
19:19:43 <cverna> +1
19:20:12 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- smooge edited the close_status and status fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8705 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8705
19:20:13 <nirik> yeah...
19:20:13 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- smooge commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8705: "Rebuild old R630 cloud boxes to be virthost-cloud boxes" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8705#comment-629865
19:20:25 <nirik> .ticket 8706
19:20:27 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8706: Enable auto signing on f32-gnome side tag - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8706
19:20:37 <nirik> I can do this, will need a freeze break...
19:20:54 <nirik> however, we could also just ask kalev to tag it into the pending tag and get it all signed at the end.
19:21:05 <nirik> I guess that makes it slow to be able to make the update.
19:21:11 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.tag.added -- smooge tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#8706: koji https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8706
19:21:12 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.assigned.added -- smooge assigned ticket fedora-infrastructure#8706 to kevin https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8706
19:21:13 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- smooge edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8706 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8706
19:21:14 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- smooge commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8706: "Enable auto signing on f32-gnome side tag" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8706#comment-629867
19:21:36 <nirik> .ticket 8707
19:21:37 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8707: Find all old retired components in bugzilla and mark them 'closed to new bugs' - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8707
19:21:44 <nirik> oh, I guess pingou already got this one
19:22:02 <nirik> .ticket 8708
19:22:03 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8708: Wipe autocloud-aarch64-01 and make into builder - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8708
19:22:26 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- smooge edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8708 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8708
19:22:29 <nirik> just needs doing. It's a mustang. I don't know where it stands in the move pile
19:22:50 <kalev> nirik: I think it's fine if the update creation is slow and everything is signed then, no need to enable autosigning for the side tag if it's difficult right now
19:22:58 <smooge> well you wanted all the mustangs moved to IAD2 so I have been trying to do that
19:23:39 <nirik> kalev: ok, basically it means justtagging them into pending tag and it will sign them all then, and after they are signed you can make the update...
19:23:46 <nirik> if that delay is ok, no need to autosign
19:24:04 <nirik> smooge: yeah. Just hard to keep track of what mustang is what
19:24:23 <nirik> there's two in the 'cloud' racks also that we never setup. ;(
19:24:40 <smooge> yeah.. I expect that when they pull some to move over it is going to drop things we thought were something else
19:24:54 <smooge> I have those to move over.. we could kill them if you want
19:25:06 <nirik> .ticket 8709
19:25:08 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8709: Permissions update to github.com/fedora-infra for Fedora Badges - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8709
19:25:17 <cverna> I can do that
19:25:27 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.assigned.added -- cverna assigned ticket fedora-infrastructure#8709 to cverna https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8709
19:25:28 <nirik> smooge: naw, would be good to have them in rdu2 I think...
19:25:33 <nirik> cverna: cool
19:26:44 <nirik> cverna: don't forget to change to waiting on asignee. ;)
19:26:50 <nirik> ok, thats it for needs review.
19:26:53 <cverna> ha yeah :)
19:26:54 <nirik> anything else we want to discuss?
19:27:01 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- cverna edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8709 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8709
19:27:13 <smooge> ok I have one thing
19:27:18 <cverna> would be nice to have a zodbot alias to setup the priority
19:27:50 <smooge> https://paste.centos.org/view/77b48688 is my list of what is moving in the first 2 waves of hardware to either IAD2 or RDU Community Cage
19:27:53 <nirik> since I am done with old cloud retirement I was going to try and focus on tickets this week... unless there's any urgent fires I should work on.
19:28:38 <smooge> my fires are mostly paperwork of what ports are open where, what ips we need, what our networks at each site should look like
19:28:57 <cverna> does not sound fun :(
19:29:29 <nirik> smooge: one thing I noticed just now...
19:29:45 <smooge> so nirik I will probably be needing to ask you some 'how do you want this architected when you have no idea what it will be' questions
19:30:18 <nirik> we have 2 sets of 1g switches for the cloud now.. do both of those need to go to rdu2?
19:30:37 <nirik> well, 5 of them for 3 racks
19:31:25 <smooge> we will need to send 5 switches. 1 10gig switch, 2 lowend 1 gig switches for mgmt ports and 2 1 gig switches for prod.
19:31:29 <nirik> yeah, happy to try and come up with arch/help any way I can
19:31:42 <nirik> ok, there's a extra then...
19:32:33 <nirik> smooge: are you ok with all machines we setup in the new dc using uefi/secureboot? I still need to try and see if I can get encryption working transparently.
19:32:36 <smooge> i am going to request this so we do not have to buy switches at RDU which may not get there til May
19:33:11 <smooge> I am going to assume we will just be typing in passwords a lot from mgmt consoles
19:33:36 <nirik> if we cannot get encryption working transparently, we will not do it.
19:33:43 <nirik> (for most everything)
19:34:35 <nirik> also bare metal should be rhel8 (unless it has to be newest fedora)
19:34:43 <nirik> anyhow... shall we close out? or anything else?
19:34:44 <smooge> actually I am ok with it being needed as long as the password is not over 32 characters long :)
19:34:49 <smooge> #endmeeting