https://github.com/ansible/proposals/issues/178
and https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/69680 make sure that
people know *WHAT* exactly is deprecating something (or *WHERE* a
new feature was added) - no matter whether it's about versions or
dates (felixfontein,
15:38:32)
ACTION: https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/69313 use
antsibull-changelog for ansible/ansible(felixfontein,
15:54:25)
https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/69313 use antsibull-changelog for ansible/ansible(abadger1999, 16:04:13)
ACTION: mattclay and
nitzmahone to review 69313 to get it merged before 2.10beta1.(abadger1999,
16:11:45)
if not merged before 2.10beta1, ansible-base
RMs can get it working before 2.10 final but there will be a lot of
additional work to make that happen.(abadger1999,
16:13:17)
ACTION: felixfontein
to look at splitting the per-collection-changelog functionality into
its own package.(abadger1999,
16:27:34)
AGREED: https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/69313 is a
2.10 blocker... will attempt to get it in before 2.10beta1(abadger1999,
16:35:09)
18:11 <@abadger1999> #action mattclay and nitzmahone to review 69313 to get it merged before 2.10beta1.(felixfontein, 16:35:18)
testing of website build for ansible-2.10(abadger1999, 17:01:57)
one issue we have is that the non-website-build
ansible-test tests do not check the whole schema(abadger1999,
17:28:43)
ACTION: abadger1999
to talk to mattclay about some possibilities he has for rectifying
the schema.(abadger1999,
17:29:09)
AGREED: we do not
have to do anything in ansible/ansible to solver people are not
running the docs tests against their collections.(abadger1999,
17:30:07)
AGREED: we can rely
on the current tests in ansible-test (ansible-doc parsing for
everything and avlidate-modules does a 90% shcema validation for
modules) to cover the most problematic test cases for 2.10.(abadger1999,
17:48:16)
AGREED: ansible/ansible will continue to test all parts of
the docsite that ship within the ansible/ansible repo(abadger1999,
17:49:06)
AGREED: updates to
the website build test which only runs against ansible/ansible can
be put in after freeze.(abadger1999,
17:49:28)
ACTION: abadger1999
to update the website build and website build test(abadger1999,
17:49:48)
ACTION: acozine to
add "please test against the stable ansible-base version you are
targeting" to
https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/devel/dev_guide/developing_collections.html#testing-collections(abadger1999,
18:05:20)
AGREED: need to
figure out a way to start using requires_ansible_version for
building ansible for 2.11(abadger1999,
18:05:53)
ACTION: abadger1999
to open a bug to look into requires_ansible_version for building
ansible for 2.11(abadger1999,
18:06:09)
https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/69313 use antsibull-changelog for ansible/ansible
mattclay and nitzmahone to review 69313 to get it merged before 2.10beta1.
felixfontein to look at splitting the per-collection-changelog functionality into its own package.
nitzmahone and mattclay to review today.
nitzmahone and mattclay to review https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/69680 today
abadger1999 to talk to mattclay about some possibilities he has for rectifying the schema.
abadger1999 to update the website build and website build test
acozine to add "please test against the stable ansible-base version you are targeting" to https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/devel/dev_guide/developing_collections.html#testing-collections
abadger1999 to open a bug to look into requires_ansible_version for building ansible for 2.11
Action items, by person
abadger1999
abadger1999 to talk to mattclay about some possibilities he has for rectifying the schema.
abadger1999 to update the website build and website build test
abadger1999 to open a bug to look into requires_ansible_version for building ansible for 2.11
acozine
acozine to add "please test against the stable ansible-base version you are targeting" to https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/devel/dev_guide/developing_collections.html#testing-collections
felixfontein
felixfontein to look at splitting the per-collection-changelog functionality into its own package.
mattclay
mattclay and nitzmahone to review 69313 to get it merged before 2.10beta1.
nitzmahone and mattclay to review today.
nitzmahone and mattclay to review https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/69680 today
abadger1999 to talk to mattclay about some possibilities he has for rectifying the schema.
nitzmahone
mattclay and nitzmahone to review 69313 to get it merged before 2.10beta1.
nitzmahone and mattclay to review today.
nitzmahone and mattclay to review https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/69680 today