ansible_community_meeting
LOGS
19:00:02 <felixfontein> #startmeeting Ansible Community Meeting
19:00:02 <zodbot> Meeting started Wed Nov 23 19:00:02 2022 UTC.
19:00:02 <zodbot> This meeting is logged and archived in a public location.
19:00:02 <zodbot> The chair is felixfontein. Information about MeetBot at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zodbot#Meeting_Functions.
19:00:02 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
19:00:02 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'ansible_community_meeting'
19:00:02 <felixfontein> #topic Agenda https://github.com/ansible/community/issues/645
19:00:02 <felixfontein> acozine andersson007_ baptistemm bcoca briantist cyberpear cybette dericcrago dmsimard felixfontein geerlingguy gundalow gwmngilfen ikhan_ jillr jtanner lmodemal misc nitzmahone resmo samccann tadeboro cidrblock thaumos zbr: ping!
19:00:06 <felixfontein> #info Agenda: https://github.com/ansible/community/issues/645 / Topics: https://github.com/ansible-community/community-topics
19:00:09 <felixfontein> #topic Updates
19:00:25 <gotmax> .hello gotmax23
19:00:26 <zodbot> gotmax: gotmax23 'Maxwell G' <gotmax@e.email>
19:00:31 <andersson007__> o/
19:00:36 <felixfontein> #chair gotmax andersson007__
19:00:36 <zodbot> Current chairs: andersson007__ felixfontein gotmax
19:00:37 <acozine> o/
19:00:41 <samccann> \o
19:00:44 <cybette_> o/
19:00:50 <felixfontein> #chair acozine samccann cybette_
19:00:50 <zodbot> Current chairs: acozine andersson007__ cybette_ felixfontein gotmax samccann
19:00:51 <gotmax> I'm not sure how much turn out we'll have given it's Thanksgiving weekend in the US
19:01:28 <anwesha> Hello all amazing people
19:01:28 <felixfontein> hmm, btw, what happened to the idea of storing the pinglist somewhere? I see mine is pretty out of date...
19:01:34 <felixfontein> #chair anwesha
19:01:34 <zodbot> Current chairs: acozine andersson007__ anwesha cybette_ felixfontein gotmax samccann
19:01:42 * gotmax wishes a happy Thanksgiving to those who celebrate and happy Not Having To Deal With American Colleagues Day to everyone else
19:02:03 <samccann> AAAHAHAHAHA
19:02:14 <andersson007__> 🤣
19:02:19 <samccann> omgosh an international holiday from 'mericans!
19:02:19 <cybette_> lol
19:02:25 <gotmax> felixfontein: I started doing it yesterday but never submitted the PR
19:02:47 <acozine> heh
19:03:03 <felixfontein> gotmax: no worries, we have some more weeks to do this ;)
19:03:27 <mariolenz[m]> o/
19:03:37 <felixfontein> #chair mariolenz[m]
19:03:37 <zodbot> Current chairs: acozine andersson007__ anwesha cybette_ felixfontein gotmax mariolenz[m] samccann
19:04:05 <mariolenz[m]> Any topics?
19:04:08 <felixfontein> #info Ansible 7.0.0 has been released! https://groups.google.com/g/ansible-project/c/_in8jqIr7BE/m/m485FzmLAQAJ
19:04:21 <gotmax> Thank you to the collection maintainers, release engineers, and all of the other contributors who made this happen!
19:04:27 <andersson007__> +1
19:04:49 <gotmax> mariolenz[m]: There's https://github.com/ansible-community/community-topics/issues/131#issuecomment-1325267227
19:04:54 <anwesha> Thank you everyone for all your hard work :)
19:04:58 <felixfontein> #info we finally got a response from RH legal on our questions on excluding files; a preliminary summary can be found here: https://github.com/ansible-community/community-topics/issues/131#issuecomment-1325267227
19:05:35 <felixfontein> anwesha: thanks to you and chadams[m] for working on the release!
19:06:00 <gotmax> #topic Questions to legal and unnecessary files
19:06:02 <gotmax> #link https://github.com/ansible-community/community-topics/issues/131
19:06:31 <acozine> huzzah for getting an answer!
19:06:35 <felixfontein> indeed!
19:06:55 <felixfontein> the way I understand it is that we can exclude tests and CI configs from collection tarballs
19:07:15 * gotmax is excited to finally be able to upstream his Fedora patches for this
19:07:34 <mariolenz[m]> yep. that's my understanding, too.
19:07:34 <felixfontein> I've already started digging out dmsimard's PR for c.g and adding some comments :)
19:08:13 <gotmax> I agree with felixfontein in https://github.com/ansible-collections/community.general/pull/3517 that removing tests from the tarballs is a breaking change
19:08:15 <andersson007__> i think we can also exclude gitignores
19:08:22 <gotmax> andersson007__: Indeed
19:08:27 <felixfontein> we need to make sure to not accidentally exclude stuff we need (like changelogs/ and docs/docsite/), and I would say that excluding tests etc. is a breaking change that should wait for a new major release
19:08:58 <anwesha> Yes .gitignored can (safely) be excluded.
19:09:22 <andersson007__> 👍
19:09:36 <gotmax> I'd also like to add support to antsibull for downloading the missing tests
19:10:12 <gotmax> But overall I'm very happy about this!
19:10:14 <felixfontein> gotmax: you mean for creating a source release?
19:10:29 <gotmax> Yes, a source release of the ansible package
19:10:43 <andersson007__> do we need anything besides running sanity tests?
19:11:09 <felixfontein> I guess one question is whether we want to include things needed for sanity testing in the collection release
19:11:26 <felixfontein> excluding tests/ also removes tests/sanity/ignore-xxx.txt
19:11:36 <gotmax> Debian's ansible package runs these tests and I believe that dmsimard's sanity test work relies on them as well
19:11:37 <andersson007__> good point
19:12:41 <felixfontein> including tests/sanity/ignore-xxx.txt but excluding other files is problematic though, since tests/sanity/ignore-xxx.txt could reference excluded files, which would cause sanity tests to fail
19:12:46 <andersson007__> i think we should be able to run sanity tests against the tarbals
19:13:06 <felixfontein> for example tests/sanity/ignore-2.15.txt in community.general references .azure-pipelines/scripts/publish-codecov.py
19:13:32 <gotmax> This could be a separate tarball that includes everything so we can keep the sdist slim.
19:13:39 <felixfontein> andersson007__: I'm not sure, that would make excluding stuff a lot harder
19:13:59 <andersson007__> maybe a separate tarball as gotmax is suggesting?
19:14:21 <andersson007__> not sure
19:14:24 <felixfontein> andersson007__: you mean for the collection, or for ansible?
19:14:49 <andersson007__> felixfontein: not sure:)
19:15:01 <remindbot[m]> @cybette:ansible.im cyb-clock chimes every 15 minutes during the community meeting
19:15:08 <gotmax> We could take the existing sources and layer the test directories from Git on top or just download everything from Git and publish that as one source tarball.
19:15:19 <gotmax> I'm talking about ansible
19:16:52 <felixfontein> I like the idea, though it would make the release process more complicated
19:17:44 <felixfontein> also some collections have 'funny stuff' in their repos, like older releases as tarballs
19:17:51 <gotmax> felixfontein: I think it's worth it, but I don't deny that it would do that :)
19:17:57 <felixfontein> (/me remembers one collection that forgot to exclude these from releases)
19:18:08 <gotmax> felixfontein: And entire venvs...
19:18:25 <felixfontein> yes... I don't really want to have all that crap in the source release :)
19:18:42 <andersson007__> hehe
19:19:41 <felixfontein> I'm still wishing for collections publishing both a source and 'user' release on galaxy...
19:19:55 <felixfontein> like sdists and wheels on pypi
19:20:21 <gotmax> felixfontein: I don't think all of that is published in their git repositories, though.
19:20:51 <gotmax> The venv directory issue was probably because ansible-galaxy collection build was run in a dirty checkout
19:21:50 <felixfontein> the tarball issue was actually for tarballs in the git repo
19:21:56 <felixfontein> I forgot which collection that was though
19:22:33 <gotmax> I can look into to adding support to antsibull for downloading missing test directories. So e.g. community.general could add an entry to collection-meta.yaml that they want the tests directory included in the source release.
19:22:37 <felixfontein> oh, it was this one: https://github.com/CiscoDevNet/ansible-ucs/tree/master/releases
19:22:51 <gotmax> Yeah, I thought it was one of the cisco ones
19:23:48 <felixfontein> hmm, you mean an explicit "reverse exclude"? it might be better to keep that information in the collection itself instead of having it in collection-meta.yaml
19:24:02 <felixfontein> that increases he chances of that information not being out of date, or at least I would hope so
19:24:36 <gotmax> felixfontein: Good point
19:25:15 <gotmax> I might need help from you or someone else more familar with the antsibull code base, but I think this is a workable idea :)
19:25:40 <felixfontein> I'll try to help!
19:26:17 <gotmax> The nice thing about keeping it in collection-meta.yaml is avoiding the need to download all of the collections to get this data, but I think having stale data is a bigger problem
19:26:41 <felixfontein> well, the data could be included in the collection's release tarball ;)
19:26:52 <felixfontein> as meta/community.yml or something like that ;)
19:27:18 <gotmax> #action gotmax and felixfontein to look into adding support to antsibull for creating an ansible source distribution
19:27:50 <gotmax> felixfontein: Also, thank you for all of your work with antsibull! I know you've been maintaining it yourself for a while :)
19:28:11 <felixfontein> thanks!
19:28:26 <andersson007__> +1
19:30:02 <remindbot[m]> @cybette:ansible.im cyb-clock chimes every 15 minutes during the community meeting
19:32:55 <gotmax> Does anyone have anything else they want to discuss?
19:33:04 <bcoca> weather is nice ...
19:33:11 <gotmax> :)
19:33:14 <felixfontein> I was just glancing over the community topics, but didn't see something for now
19:33:49 <acozine> my head is full of pie recipes
19:34:03 <acozine> not really Ansible-related
19:34:20 <felixfontein> for the private plugins in collections topic, I've created a new implementation using meta/runtime.yml (https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/79370, https://github.com/ansible-community/antsibull-docs/pull/65) and am currently waiting for feedback (mainly from core on the ansible-core PR)
19:34:46 <felixfontein> pieable-playbook pies.yml
19:35:47 <gotmax> ansible-cookbook
19:35:52 <acozine> should that be pieable-playbook pies.yum?
19:36:18 <felixfontein> also, if someone is familiar with the redhat_subscription module, there are some PRs looking for reviewers: https://github.com/ansible-collections/community.general/pull/5583 https://github.com/ansible-collections/community.general/pull/5581
19:36:22 <samccann> heh
19:36:22 <cybette_> good one :)
19:36:31 <felixfontein> acozine: even better!
19:36:39 <gotmax> If it was pies.yum, you'd have to rewrite it a bunch of times
19:36:47 <gotmax> I don't think we ever discussed andersson007__'s collection inclusion issue. I have a follow up on release tagging.  Not sure if there's anything else re. removing dead content from c.g. (https://github.com/ansible-community/community-topics/issues/20).
19:36:55 <felixfontein> #topic open floor
19:37:17 <gotmax> (That was a comment about yum/dnf ;)
19:37:25 <acozine> heh
19:37:25 <andersson007__> gotmax: i need to drop now unfortunately
19:37:39 <felixfontein> I think for removing dead content from c.g and others, we first need to collect some data (even if 'just' grazing github.com and galaxy)
19:37:42 * gotmax waves to andersson007__
19:37:46 <felixfontein> bye andersson007__!
19:37:51 <andersson007__> see y'a! thanks
19:37:53 <cybette_> #info We love and appreciate your feedback! Please take the Contributor Survey and help us improve the Ansible Community - https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/7PVX5S2
19:37:56 <cybette_> Thanks to those who've already filled in the survey!
19:38:10 <cybette_> see you andersson007__!
19:38:25 * felixfontein looks forward to the next contributor summit in ghent :)
19:38:41 * cybette_ too!
19:39:25 <gotmax> Is that hybrid or only in person?
19:39:56 <cybette_> we're planning for hybrid!
19:39:59 <felixfontein> I would guess hybrid
19:40:11 <gotmax> Cool
19:40:15 <felixfontein> so far I've only seen hybrid and online-only ones :)
19:41:01 <gotmax> Re. the release tagging issues we've opened, there's been no response from cyberark.pas or cisco.nso
19:41:17 <felixfontein> :(
19:41:23 <gotmax> We may need to start the removal process for cyberark.pas
19:41:29 <felixfontein> I guess it's time to start cleaning up...
19:41:44 <felixfontein> how about waiting another week (until thanksgiving is over) and start it next week?
19:41:54 <gotmax> felixfontein and I both pinged them again so hopefully they'll respond
19:42:00 <gotmax> felixfontein: Wfm
19:42:51 <gotmax> I also opened issues against hpe.nimble and inspur.sm which tagged their other releases but not the most recent ones
19:43:23 <felixfontein> thanks!
19:43:26 <gotmax> There was a response for both fortinet.fortimanager and fortinet.fortios, but I think only the latter was fixed
19:45:03 <remindbot[m]> @cybette:ansible.im cyb-clock chimes every 15 minutes during the community meeting
19:48:49 <felixfontein> if there's no more stuff to discuss, I guess we can also close early :)
19:49:27 <cybette_> yeah I guess we can close early :)
19:49:49 <gotmax> Okay with me
19:50:15 <gotmax> I just submitted https://github.com/ansible-community/community-topics/pull/159
19:50:29 <gotmax> To add the ping list
19:51:38 <felixfontein> \o/
19:51:44 <felixfontein> will take a look at that later :)
19:51:51 <gotmax> thanks!
19:51:54 <felixfontein> ok, time to end
19:51:55 <felixfontein> #endmeeting