15:00:36 <apevec> #startmeeting RDO packaging meeting (2015-07-22)
15:00:36 <zodbot> Meeting started Wed Jul 22 15:00:36 2015 UTC.  The chair is apevec. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:36 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
15:00:49 <apevec> #topic roll call
15:00:56 <apevec> #info agenda at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/RDO-Packaging
15:00:56 <elmiko> o/
15:01:07 <number80> o/
15:01:23 <apevec> #chair elmiko number80
15:01:23 <zodbot> Current chairs: apevec elmiko number80
15:01:39 <alphacc> o/
15:01:47 <number80> #chair alphacc
15:01:47 <zodbot> Current chairs: alphacc apevec elmiko number80
15:02:32 <apevec> number80, which BZ# / alias is liberty review tracker?
15:02:36 <eggmaste`> o/
15:03:01 <number80> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243533
15:03:06 <number80> apevec ^
15:03:09 <chandankumar> o/
15:03:10 <apevec> thanks
15:03:10 <jruzicka> o/
15:03:38 <xaeth> o\
15:03:44 <dtantsur> o/
15:03:46 <number80> #chair chandankumar jruzicka xaeth dtantsur
15:03:46 <zodbot> Current chairs: alphacc apevec chandankumar dtantsur elmiko jruzicka number80 xaeth
15:04:15 <apevec> alrighty quorum reached
15:04:20 <apevec> #topic liberty reviews
15:04:30 <apevec> nicely bookmarkable URL is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=RDO-LIBERTY-REVIEWS
15:04:41 <number80> please update it accordingly ;)
15:04:59 <chandankumar> apevec, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241808 is this comes under liberty?
15:05:10 <apevec> all libery reviews should have ^ in Blocks
15:05:14 <number80> yes
15:05:36 <number80> forgot it
15:05:37 <apevec> number80, yeah, not all have now, I'll cross check with https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/RDO-Trunk
15:06:22 <number80> this week won't see much reviews closed, except for chandankumar's as it's closed to be finished
15:06:54 * ktdreyer reads scrollback from vacation
15:07:09 <apevec> we definitely need to improve our review velocity but it cannot be just number80 doing them :)
15:07:21 <apevec> everybody is welcome to do reviews
15:07:27 <ktdreyer> jruzicka: I'm managing ceph with rdopkg now, for Red Hat's Ceph Storage product downstream :)
15:07:35 <apevec> even informal, if you're not in Fedora packagers yet would help
15:07:47 <number80> yes, especially as I still haven't had enough time for the mass reviews for ops tools :(
15:07:50 <apevec> ktdreyer, nice! jruzicka++
15:07:53 <ktdreyer> jruzicka: I worked around the "v" tags issue by creating some simple annotated tags without the "v" :)
15:08:14 <ktdreyer> obviously just a workaround until we can get that particular issue resolved
15:08:19 <ktdreyer> apevec: yeah!
15:08:55 <ktdreyer> it all started to "click" for me once I realized that I have to set up all *three* remotes in my dist-git clone
15:08:56 <ayoung> running packstack on a rhel7.2 box I get ValueError: Unable to configure handler 'syslog': [Errno 111] Connection refused
15:09:11 <number80> let's wait the end of the meeting, it won't be long ;)
15:09:13 <ktdreyer> for some reason I wasn't able to immediately understand that prerequisite
15:09:14 <ayoung> I've got rsyslog installed..but has something changed with syslog in general?
15:09:16 <apevec> number80, anything else for reviews? I'll take action to start tracing them more closely
15:09:28 <ayoung> ah...sorry, meeting
15:09:37 <apevec> #action apevec start tracking package reviews more closely
15:09:45 <number80> apevec: nope, not worried about reviews making liberty schedule slip, just wanted to sync with everyone
15:10:08 <apevec> yep, but milestones are coming fast!
15:10:15 <apevec> liberty-2 is next week
15:10:34 <apevec> and I'd like to have closure in CBS by then
15:10:43 <apevec> s/closure/repo closure/
15:11:03 <number80> yeah, it should be ok, there may be delay on jpena's fedora builds though
15:11:21 <number80> (as I can't request scm import in his stead)
15:11:31 <number80> but nothing worrying
15:11:45 <apevec> ok, I won't block on that and can use temporary rpm-liberty-2  branch
15:11:49 <number80> ack for milestone-2
15:12:11 <apevec> next topic
15:12:13 <apevec> #topic various clients issues raised
15:12:20 <apevec> number80, ^ any examples? bz# ?
15:12:40 <number80> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244291
15:12:52 <number80> this one, don't bother the report, the bug is legit but something else
15:12:54 <apevec> #info please forward clients issues to hguemar if they're not processed
15:13:09 <number80> since I don't received notifications, some may come to my attention late
15:13:37 <number80> so help me to triage them :)
15:13:57 <number80> I'll escalate tricky ones to jruzicka
15:14:21 <jruzicka> sure thing
15:14:28 <chandankumar> do we had a list of bugs which needs to be triaged for RDO?
15:14:51 <number80> chandankumar: nope, but if you do, you'll be my hero ;)
15:15:08 <chandankumar> number80, i will take this as my action item
15:15:08 <apevec> there are actualy nicely formated RDO bz reports from larsks
15:15:17 <number80> chandankumar++
15:15:20 * larsks needs to start resending those.
15:15:22 <apevec> it was posted on rdo-list in the past
15:15:36 <larsks> (fell off the bandwagon due to summit and never climbed back on)
15:15:37 <apevec> larsks, if chandankumar is willing, you could hand over to him?
15:15:46 <number80> larsks: maybe you could sync with chandankumar?
15:15:50 <chandankumar> sure
15:16:01 <number80> <3
15:16:05 <larsks> Sure.
15:16:17 <apevec> #action chandankumar to take over RDO bz reports from larsks
15:16:52 <apevec> ok that's all we had on agenda
15:17:01 <apevec> #topic open floor
15:17:21 <alphacc> a quick one about https://github.com/apevec/centos-release-openstack ; we did few changes with apevec this week if someone else wants to have a look
15:17:22 <jruzicka> ktdreyer, so I'm working on the vX.Y.Z support for rdopkg
15:17:53 <apevec> alphacc, yes, I wanted to create liberty version to test actual upgrade
15:18:02 <apevec> or rather non-upgrade!
15:18:06 * number80 has to leave
15:18:30 <alphacc> apevec: as soon as you build it I'll run it through our ci at work.
15:18:37 <apevec> the goal is to have parallel installable kilo and liberyt centos-release-openstack rpms
15:19:02 <apevec> ahem, wrong
15:19:25 <apevec> the goal is to be able to stay on kilo release-openstack rpm
15:19:30 <alphacc> the goal is to have the choice between releases :)
15:19:34 <apevec> i.e. not upgrade automatically
15:19:35 <apevec> right
15:21:22 <apevec> ok, any other updates or issues?
15:22:24 <elmiko> xaeth: have you seen the barbican updates?
15:22:41 <xaeth> i'm fixing the (hopefully) final issue right now
15:22:49 <xaeth> the suggestion didnt actually work, but i'm almost done
15:23:03 <elmiko> awesome =)
15:25:06 <apevec> looking at ihrachyshka's email: we need to ask pixelbeat_ to update eventlet to 0.17.4
15:25:28 <apevec> and tooz is Oslo so should be chasing trunk
15:25:33 <xaeth> https://github.com/gregswift/barbican-spec/commit/46acd1998c7bb890acecd8a5f1913bc2816b8f2d
15:25:42 <pixelbeat_> apevec, update on which branches?
15:25:42 <apevec> i.e. in rdoinfo ... if not, needs to be added
15:25:48 <apevec> pixelbeat_, master (f24)
15:25:49 <elmiko> xaeth: thanks
15:26:03 <pixelbeat_> apevec, I'll look now...
15:26:21 <apevec> for now, it is not capped in stable/kilo
15:26:27 <apevec> so we might want to update f23 too
15:26:33 <apevec> pixelbeat_, thanks
15:28:43 <apevec> last call for open floor!
15:29:41 * elmiko dances on open floor >.<
15:30:18 <apevec> we definitly need to include theme music in the agenda next time :)
15:30:25 <apevec> so we dance to the same tune
15:30:42 <apevec> alright, thanks everybody!
15:30:55 <apevec> #endmeeting