12:00:31 <kshlm> #startmeeting Weekly Gluster Community Meeting - 17/2/2016
12:00:31 <zodbot> Meeting started Wed Feb 17 12:00:31 2016 UTC.  The chair is kshlm. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
12:00:31 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
12:00:31 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'weekly_gluster_community_meeting_-_17/2/2016'
12:00:40 <kshlm> #topic Rollcall
12:00:47 <kshlm> Please raise your hands if you're here.
12:01:01 * kshlm o/
12:01:02 <jiffin> o/
12:01:05 <post-factum> o/
12:01:29 * rjoseph o/
12:01:38 * amye is here
12:01:41 * overclk -> hands up
12:01:41 * anoopcs is here
12:01:46 <kshlm> I expect more people today.
12:02:12 * ndevos is here
12:02:18 * atinm is in
12:02:32 <kshlm> Some more?
12:03:21 <kshlm> Okay. Let's start.
12:03:26 <kshlm> Today's agenda is at https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-community-meetings
12:03:33 <kshlm> #topic Last week's AI's
12:03:45 <kshlm> #topic ndevos to send out a reminder to the maintainers about more actively enforcing backports of bugfixes
12:04:09 <kshlm> ndevos, Not done yet?
12:04:17 <ndevos> uh, no :-(
12:04:33 <kshlm> So we carry it forward.
12:04:45 <kshlm> Will it be done next week? For sure?
12:04:54 <ndevos> I'll definitely try!
12:05:01 <kshlm> Cool!
12:05:52 <kshlm> #action ndevos to send out a reminder to the maintainers about more actively enforcing backports of bugfixes
12:06:01 <kshlm> #topic kshlm & csim to set up faux/pseudo user email for gerrit, bugzilla, github
12:06:06 * msvbhat joins the meeting
12:06:14 <kshlm> We didn't do this, but we migrated Gerrit last week.
12:06:33 <kshlm> csim is out till the end of the month, so this will get carried forward.
12:06:41 <amye> thx kshlm
12:06:44 <kshlm> #action kshlm & csim to set up faux/pseudo user email for gerrit, bugzilla, github
12:06:57 <kshlm> Thank you amye :)
12:07:03 <kshlm> #topic rastar and msvbhat to consolidate and publish testing matrix on gluster.org in a weeks time, amye can help
12:07:17 <kshlm> rastar, msvbhat, you guys have been missing for so many meetings.
12:07:18 <amye> I think it's done
12:07:21 <kshlm> Any update?
12:07:24 <msvbhat> I have sent the pull request to glusterweb this morning
12:07:29 <kshlm> A okay.
12:07:33 <kshlm> Link to the PR?
12:07:41 * sac joins the meeting
12:07:47 <kshlm> Or to the actual page if it's merged.
12:07:49 * msvbhat fetching link
12:08:06 <msvbhat> https://github.com/gluster/glusterweb/pull/38
12:08:10 <msvbhat> kshlm: ^^
12:08:14 <kshlm> Thanks.
12:08:22 <kshlm> #url https://github.com/gluster/glusterweb/pull/38
12:08:25 <amye> merging now
12:08:41 <msvbhat> That is a plain html page with tables. But need someone to review
12:08:42 <amye> It passed all the tests, if it breaks something, I'll fix it. ;)
12:08:57 <kshlm> Thanks amye .
12:09:00 <msvbhat> amye: Great, Thanks
12:09:19 <kshlm> Finally after ~2 months, this gets done.
12:09:26 <kshlm> #topic kkeithley to send a mail about using sanity checker tools in the codebase in two weeks.
12:09:27 <msvbhat> Yes :)
12:09:31 <amye> we get there. :)
12:09:40 <kshlm> I think kkeithley is off this week.
12:09:51 <kshlm> Carrying this forward.
12:09:54 <ndevos> no he isnt, but he's not in this channel atm
12:09:58 <kshlm> #action kkeithley to send a mail about using sanity checker tools in the codebase in two weeks.
12:10:18 <kshlm> #topic kshlm to announce 3.7.8
12:10:21 <kshlm> I did this.
12:10:28 <kshlm> I pushed release-notes for 3.7.8
12:10:32 <ndevos> :)
12:10:37 <kshlm> But I need to push notes for 3.7.7 as well.
12:10:54 <kshlm> Maybe I'll do a big release-notes commit like I did for 3.6
12:10:58 <post-factum> for sure, ppl still asking for 3.7.7 notes
12:11:13 <kshlm> #action kshlm to update missing release-notes for 3.7
12:11:32 <amye> kshlm, let me know when that's done, I'm going to submit a patch to change the front page from talking about our latest release to talking about all our currently supported releases.
12:11:47 <amye> Having just 3.5.7 up there isn't that useful.
12:11:47 <kshlm> post-factum, Yup. This is something release-managers should definitely keep in mind.
12:11:57 <kshlm> But somehow it gets forgotten.
12:12:04 <kshlm> amye, Sure. I'll let you know.
12:12:07 * rastar comes late..
12:12:20 <kshlm> If you want to link to 3.7.8, we already have the release-notes.
12:12:51 <amye> Would like to do all of it at once.
12:12:56 * skoduri is here
12:13:03 <aravindavk> kshlm: Any doc to understand responsibility of release managers?
12:13:10 <kshlm> amye, https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/release-3.7/doc/release-notes/3.7.8.md
12:13:20 <kshlm> aravindavk, We have a page on readthedocs.
12:13:39 <kshlm> Someone have a link to it?
12:14:08 <ndevos> #link http://gluster.readthedocs.org/en/latest/Contributors-Guide/GlusterFS-Release-process/
12:14:15 <kshlm> Thanks ndevos!
12:14:19 <aravindavk> kshlm: ndevos thanks
12:15:00 <kshlm> #topic hagarth to send migration/downtime announcement to the mailing lists.
12:15:07 <kshlm> The mail was sent.
12:15:15 <kshlm> The systems were brought down.
12:15:38 <kshlm> One came back up in a new place, but the other one came back up where it was.
12:15:47 <kshlm> So Gerrit has been migrated.
12:16:00 <rastar> Yay!!
12:16:17 <rastar> it was good to see the conversation between kshlm and misc on gluster-dev
12:16:18 <kshlm> Jenkins couldn't be migrated because we underestimated the sync time (and the bad network)
12:16:34 <ndevos> gerrit feels faster, or do I imagine that?
12:16:40 <rastar> ndevos: it does!
12:16:48 * raghu is here
12:16:59 <amye> jenkins will be migrated in march
12:17:04 <post-factum> ndevos: it is
12:17:11 <kshlm> We have a plan for a minimal downtime migration for jenkins. But it'll happen in march once csim is back.
12:17:33 <kshlm> That's it.
12:18:01 <kshlm> If anyone has questions/concerns on this, please inform gluster-infra
12:18:12 <kshlm> #topic atinm hagarth kshlm to create a list of rotating volunteers for hosting community meetings.
12:18:35 * kshlm raghug o/
12:18:37 <atinm> kshlm, its not done yet, I'll work with hagarth on this
12:18:45 <kshlm> atinm, Sure.
12:19:01 <kshlm> Carrying this forward.
12:19:02 <kshlm> #action atinm hagarth kshlm to create a list of rotating volunteers for hosting community meetings.
12:19:08 <kshlm> AI's done.
12:19:36 <kshlm> #topic GlusterFS 3.7
12:19:57 <kshlm> So, I announced 3.7.8 and pushed release-notes for it.
12:20:12 <kshlm> As discussed earlier, I'll also push missing notes.
12:20:23 * ndevos checks if there is a 3.7.9 tracker
12:20:33 <kshlm> Now, we need to find a manager for 3.7.9.
12:20:50 <post-factum> should I post the list of pending memleak-related patches to 3.7.9 tracker once it is opened?
12:20:51 <kshlm> ndevos, I thought I did it.
12:20:58 <kshlm> post-factum, please do.
12:21:01 * msvbhat recommonds raghug
12:21:11 <post-factum> kshlm: ok, give me the link :)
12:21:23 <ndevos> kshlm: I cant find it with the glusterfs-3.7.9 alias, trying to find it on http://bugs.cloud.gluster.org/ now
12:21:57 <kshlm> ndevos, I thought I'd done it. I'm getting it mixed with the 3.6 stuff I did a couple of weeks earlier.
12:22:03 <kshlm> I'll open one.
12:22:22 <ndevos> kshlm: ok, I cant find it anywhere :)
12:22:22 <kshlm> #action kshlm to open 3.7.9 tracker (and close 3.7.8 if still open)
12:22:30 <kshlm> post-factum, It should be https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.7.9 once it's created
12:22:31 <glusterbot> Bug glusterfs: could not be retrieved: InvalidBugId
12:22:44 <post-factum> kshlm: ok, will check that later
12:22:44 <kshlm> raghug, So you volunteer to be the release-manager?
12:22:46 * ndevos pokes glusterbot
12:23:31 <kshlm> raghug, ?
12:23:46 <raghug> kshlm: no other volunteers?
12:24:04 <raghug> If no one else is willing, I can step in
12:24:09 <kshlm> Okay.
12:24:11 <atinm> go for it raghug :)
12:24:14 <kshlm> raghug it is then.
12:24:20 <raghug> but probably you might want to ask it out on gluster-devel
12:24:45 <ndevos> yeah, arent you doing 3.6.x too already, raghug?
12:25:23 <kshlm> ndevos, Thats rabhat or just plain raghu
12:25:42 <kshlm> We have 3 raghu's here.
12:25:42 <raghug> ndevos: its rabhat
12:25:55 <ndevos> raghug: ah, right!
12:25:55 <kshlm> #info raghug is 3.7.9 manager
12:25:56 <kshlm> Thanks, raghug
12:25:59 <kshlm> raghug++
12:25:59 <glusterbot> kshlm: raghug's karma is now 1
12:25:59 <atinm> kshlm, timeline for 3.7.9?
12:25:59 <rastar> raghug++
12:25:59 <glusterbot> rastar: raghug's karma is now 2
12:26:00 <kshlm> #topic GlusterFS 3.6
12:26:03 <post-factum> raghug++
12:26:04 <glusterbot> post-factum: raghug's karma is now 3
12:26:05 <atinm> kshlm, mid next month right?
12:26:11 <msvbhat> raghug++
12:26:12 <glusterbot> msvbhat: raghug's karma is now 4
12:26:18 <atinm> raghug++
12:26:19 <glusterbot> atinm: raghug's karma is now 5
12:26:25 <ndevos> atinm: https://www.gluster.org/community/release-schedule/
12:26:29 <kshlm> atinm, Yeah. Should be around that time.
12:26:33 <kshlm> raghug, will enforce it.
12:27:13 <kshlm> Onto 3.6.
12:27:14 <atinm> ndevos, I am aware of the normal schedule but since we had to fix a breakage and do an exception by mid of the month I believe we'd not delay it till the end of next month
12:28:12 <ndevos> atinm: oh, I wasnt aware 3.7.8 is broken too :-/
12:28:26 <kshlm> 3.7.8 isn't broken. (AFAIK)
12:28:30 <kshlm> 3.7.7 was.
12:28:32 <post-factum> ndevos: it isn't
12:28:36 <atinm> ndevos, no you misunderstood me
12:28:54 <atinm> ndevos, 3.7.7 -> 3.7.8 was exception
12:29:15 <atinm> ndevos, so if we go with a month's timeline it should be around mid of next month then
12:29:17 <ndevos> well, I do not see a reason to delay 3.7.9 and not release that according to the schedule?
12:29:36 <kshlm> ndevos, Scheduled would be end-of-feb.
12:30:01 <ndevos> atinm: we dont want to release too many different 3.x versions at the same time, I would prefer to re-adjust to the documented schedule
12:30:01 <kshlm> So shuold we do .9 next week?
12:30:11 <rastar> I agree with ndevos
12:30:19 <kshlm> I agree as well.
12:30:23 <amye> schedules++
12:30:24 <glusterbot> amye: schedules's karma is now 1
12:30:27 <amye> :D
12:30:43 <kshlm> We need to look at the previous release dates for the 3 releases and adjust the schedule.
12:31:05 <kshlm> rastar, amye, ndevos, anyone want to get this done?
12:31:08 <atinm> that's what my question was, is it this month end or mid of next month or end of next month ;)
12:31:26 <rastar> kshlm:  what do you mean by adjust the schedule?
12:31:34 <ndevos> kshlm: only 3.7 is not really following the schedule, 3.6 and 3.5 try to stick to it
12:31:48 <kshlm> ndevos, okay.
12:31:56 <rastar> I remember that 3.7.5 , 3.7.6, and 3.7.7 all released about a week late than scheduled date.
12:32:02 <ndevos> I have a strong preference to get 3.7 back on the schedule again :)
12:33:00 <rastar> ndevos: yes, we should
12:33:12 <post-factum> so, 3.7.9 is postponed till mid-march?
12:33:16 <kshlm> If we consider 3.7.8 as an early february release, we can target end-of-march for 3.7.9
12:33:17 <kshlm> What do others feel?
12:33:25 * kshlm Is anyone else seeing lotsa net-splits?
12:33:32 <ndevos> no, I expect 3.7.9 the end of February
12:33:33 * ira is.
12:33:35 <post-factum> freenode is under maintainance today
12:33:39 <rastar> kshlm: freenode is rebooting servers as part of upgrade
12:33:41 * atinm too
12:33:42 <post-factum> ndevos++
12:33:44 <glusterbot> post-factum: ndevos's karma is now 5
12:34:01 <ira> probably the nice libc bug ;)
12:34:17 <rastar> post-factum: I would say we release 3.7.9 by end of feb as per schedule
12:34:18 <kshlm> ira, Yes. Probably that.
12:34:26 <post-factum> rastar++
12:34:27 <glusterbot> post-factum: rastar's karma is now 1
12:34:29 <kshlm> Okay. End of feb it is.
12:34:31 <ndevos> the whole point of the regular releases is that we have only few patches that fix bugs, users would be more happy if we address (some of) their bugs quicker
12:34:53 <kshlm> raghug, So you have 1 week. I'll help out if you need any.
12:34:53 <post-factum> ndevos: that is why i'm here :)
12:35:06 * ira is here.
12:35:09 <rastar> post-factum:  he he :)
12:35:10 <raghug> kshlm: I am wondering isn't it too early after 3.7.8?
12:35:22 <ira> ndevos: Have you heard a user complain about too many released? ;)
12:35:24 <kshlm> .8 was an emergency release.
12:35:26 <ira> s
12:35:44 <raghug> would there be any differences b/w 3.7.8 and .9 :)?
12:35:49 <post-factum> skoduri: any issues with 3 memleak patches in review?
12:36:04 <kshlm> raghug, post-factum would like some mem-leaks fixed.
12:36:13 <raghug> of course one big change is write-behind is there
12:36:15 <skoduri> post-factum, I guess reviewers are a bit busy..will send a reminder :)
12:36:21 <kshlm> There are patches for them already.
12:36:22 <ndevos> raghug: if there are no patches backported to release-3.7 after v3.7.8 was tagged, you can skip the release and do 3.7.9 the end of march :)
12:36:43 <raghug> ndevos, yeah, thats what I was thinking
12:36:50 <kshlm> Now coming back to release-schedules.
12:36:51 <raghug> but lets see, how many patches will be there
12:37:04 <raghug> I'll drop a mail out on gluster-devel
12:37:04 <kshlm> 3.6.9 should be out end  of this week.
12:37:07 <ndevos> raghug: but count on it that there are some patches ;-)
12:37:11 <rastar> 19 patches merged in 3.7 branch after 3.7.8
12:37:24 <raghug> then we'll do a release this month :)
12:37:29 <post-factum> yay
12:37:40 * ndevos even does a release of 3.5 is there is a single patch
12:37:46 <kshlm> raghu isn't around today to update on 3.6.
12:38:16 <kshlm> Anyone else have an idea around 3.6?
12:38:17 <ndevos> rabhat that is, I know, those nicks are confusing!
12:38:29 <kshlm> ndevos, He uses raghu on freenode.
12:38:43 * ira has a very confusing nick.
12:38:44 * ndevos *facepaml*
12:38:45 <raghug> :)
12:38:50 <ira> ;)
12:38:58 <pkalever> I hope the patch unix domain sockets for IO goes in .9
12:39:00 <kshlm> The only good raghu around is rastar. No confusion there.
12:39:13 <post-factum> :D
12:39:29 <raghug> pkalever: we need reviewers for that :)
12:39:29 <kshlm> I'll ping rabhat for an update on this.
12:39:41 <raghug> I need more reviewers for rpc
12:39:45 <kshlm> #action kshlm to ping rabhat for an update on 3.6.9
12:40:13 <kshlm> #topic GlusterFs 3.5
12:40:25 <pkalever> raghug: I have requested in devel lis, lets see
12:40:25 <kshlm> ndevos, Was a 3.5 release done recently?
12:40:35 <ndevos> 3.5.8 has been tagged this weekend
12:40:59 <ndevos> packages might get build by volunteers, I have not heard of anyone doing that
12:41:01 <kshlm> So the announcement is pending.
12:41:20 <kshlm> Ah, have none been built yet?
12:41:23 <ndevos> yes, I'll announce when some packages are available on download.gluster.org
12:41:49 <kkeithley> not true.  Fedora and RHEL/CentOS packages are on d.g.o already
12:42:02 <kshlm> kkeithley, You're here!!
12:42:19 <kkeithley> ;-)
12:42:39 <ndevos> kkeithley: thanks! I didnt see a reply to http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/2016-February/000087.html yet
12:43:06 <kkeithley> right, because Debian and Ubuntu haven't been done yet.
12:43:11 <kshlm> We can have a 3.5.8 announcement today then.
12:43:52 <kshlm> For 3.7.8 the debs were built after the announcement.
12:43:56 <ndevos> kkeithley: update the http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.5/LATEST/ link too, or when is that done?
12:44:47 <kkeithley> The link is usually changed after Fedora, RHEL, and Debian packages land on d.g.o.  Otherwise it breaks Debian updates
12:44:59 <ndevos> oh, ok
12:45:15 <kkeithley> well, it doesn't have to wait
12:45:21 <kkeithley> but it's nicer to wait, IMO
12:45:50 <kshlm> kkeithley, But how long do we have to wait.
12:46:00 <ndevos> I dont mind, but I'll wait with the announcement when the /LATEST points to the release
12:46:23 <kshlm> ndevos, Okay.
12:46:37 <kshlm> #info ndevos to announce 3.5.8 once debs are built.
12:46:38 <kkeithley> If nobody else builds Debian packages, then they'll get built when I getaroundtoit
12:47:00 <sankarshan> is the gluster.org landing page updated with all the latest release announcements?
12:47:04 * ndevos handsacoupleofspacestokkeithley
12:47:26 <kshlm> sankarshan, amye will be doing it soon. Once some missing release-notes are added.
12:47:45 <kshlm> kkeithley, I think I told you that I'd be interested in doing that once.
12:47:55 <kshlm> I'll reach out to you offline.
12:48:29 <kkeithley> kshlm: yeah, go for it.
12:48:47 <sankarshan> kshlm,  ah ok. i am guessing she gets a notification to make those changes live as part of a release process
12:48:55 <kshlm> ndevos, Can I close the 3.5 topic now?
12:49:08 <ndevos> kshlm: sure, I dont have anything more
12:49:13 <amye> That is supposed to happen but has not occured, sankarshan
12:49:18 <kshlm> sankarshan, A manual notification.
12:49:25 <amye> it's part of our release docs
12:49:32 <sankarshan> alright :)
12:49:45 <kshlm> Thanks ndevos
12:49:51 <amye> Unless we want to make 'submit a PR to glusterweb' as part of the release process, which would be the best way to do this long-term
12:49:55 <kshlm> #topic GlusterFS 3.8 and 4.0
12:49:58 <kkeithley> some automation around this would be A Good Thing™
12:50:08 <amye> kkeithley, agreed
12:51:09 <ndevos> amye: maybe you can send an update to the release process doc? it does not explicitly say "email amye" :)
12:51:38 <kshlm> Didn't humble have to update the doc with something similar?
12:51:45 <kshlm> Where did we lose that AI?
12:52:08 <amye> kshlm, that was my impression as well. we talked about this in brno.
12:52:25 <kshlm> Back to topic. We 'll cover this later on open floor.
12:52:30 <amye> I'll follow up with humble, carry on.
12:52:38 <kshlm> 3.8 and 4.0 updates anyone?
12:53:03 <atinm> 4.0 development has slowed down a little to look at existing issues
12:53:04 <overclk> kshlm: I'll do 4.0 (dht) if noone for 3.8
12:53:17 <atinm> overclk, go ahead
12:53:20 <overclk> atinm: continue..
12:53:24 <atinm> :)
12:53:53 <ndevos> I think aravindavk did some more work on the eventing doc in glusterfs-specs
12:53:54 <atinm> from GD2 side we are able to add nodes and form a etcd cluster
12:54:10 <atinm> The patch is under review
12:54:21 <atinm> apart from that nothing much from GD2 as of now
12:54:26 <kshlm> On GD2, I'm still writing up a report for the volgen discussion we had in Brno. I've been stuck with other *more important* tasks.
12:54:42 <atinm> kshlm, thanks for bringing that up too
12:54:48 <Humble> kshlm, amye Yes, I have an AI on that. will do it soon.
12:55:09 <kshlm> ndevos, yes. I need to review it.
12:55:23 <amye> ack
12:55:26 <kshlm> overclk, Go ahead.
12:55:35 <overclk> kshlm, sure.
12:55:58 * kshlm wants to remind everyone we have ~5 minutes remaining.
12:56:07 <overclk> So, Shyam sent dht2 patch for review (under xlators/experimental).
12:56:21 <overclk> Mostly that would need more updates.
12:56:41 <overclk> Similarly, I would be sending posix2 patch (xlators/experimental) by next week..
12:56:51 <kshlm> overclk, Is this the patch https://review.gluster.org/13397 ?
12:57:01 <overclk> We'd need to get these merged and then further developments would start...
12:57:30 <overclk> kshlm, yes, but that's just the skeleton.
12:57:40 <kshlm> overclk, That's fine.
12:57:45 <kshlm> #url https://review.gluster.org/13397
12:57:55 <overclk> we'd need whatever we have as of now into that.
12:58:08 <overclk> plus POSIX2.
12:58:27 <overclk> -- that's about it --
12:58:31 <kshlm> overclk, That is good to hear.
12:58:34 <kshlm> Thanks.
12:58:52 <kshlm> I don't see anyone around to update on 3.8 and NSR.
12:59:09 <kshlm> ndevos, What about seek() for 3.8?
12:59:11 <aravindavk> Made some good progress with REST server for Gluster 3.8 and Eventing, Design discussion in progress. POC is here https://github.com/aravindavk/glusterrest
12:59:15 <atinm> I've some updates on NSR
12:59:28 <atinm> both server and client translator related changes are merged
12:59:35 <overclk> kshlm, a bunch of NSR related patches got merged
12:59:39 <kshlm> aravindavk, Cool.
12:59:40 <ndevos> kshlm: seek() changes have been merged, and I want to send an update to the list about follow-up tasks
12:59:49 <overclk> bunch == fdl, nsr client, nsr server.
12:59:56 <atinm> overclk, right
13:00:06 <kshlm> overclk, atinm, Thanks for the update.
13:00:13 <kshlm> ndevos, Good to know.
13:00:34 <overclk> kshlm, most importantly design doc and feature page too :)
13:00:57 <amye> so we're at time, anything else?
13:01:46 <kshlm> I don't think so.
13:01:47 <post-factum> cookies for everyone!
13:01:55 <kshlm> We've got nothing on open-floor.
13:01:59 <pkalever> ndevos: seek progress in qemu?
13:02:06 <ndevos> cookies++
13:02:07 <glusterbot> ndevos: cookies's karma is now 1
13:02:21 <ndevos> pkalever: yeah, I want to send an email with details about that
13:02:32 <pkalever> ndevos: cool
13:02:33 <kshlm> I think we can close today's meeting.
13:02:47 <amye> Hurray!
13:02:48 <post-factum> thanks kshlm
13:02:51 <ndevos> pkalever: and I got a request from Kevin Wolf to improve qemu+libgfapi even more - I need to share that too
13:02:52 <kshlm> So here are the weekly announcements
13:03:00 <kshlm> Weekly reminder to announce Gluster attendance of events: https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-events
13:03:00 <kshlm> REMINDER to put (even minor) interesting topics on https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-weekly-news
13:03:00 <kshlm> Etherpad for backport requests  https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-backport-requests
13:03:23 <pkalever> ndevos: I had a conversation with him today
13:03:43 <kshlm> Also as plug for my report on FOSDEM  https://kshlm.in/fosdem16/
13:03:52 <kshlm> Thanks everyone for coming to today's meeting.
13:04:00 <aravindavk> kshlm: nice report
13:04:00 <overclk> kshlm, thanks.
13:04:01 <Humble> thanks kshlm++ !
13:04:03 <ndevos> pkalever: good, maybe he mentioned the same to you? send a summary of your discussion to gluster-devel please :)
13:04:11 <kshlm> It was wonderful having many new (and old) faces around this time.
13:04:13 <post-factum> kshlm++ for fosdem report
13:04:20 <ndevos> thanks for hosting kshlm++ !
13:04:23 <kshlm> I hope this keeps on building.
13:04:29 <kshlm> #endreport
13:04:34 <kshlm> #endmeeting