12:02:15 <JustinClift> #startmeeting Weekly GlusterFS Community Meeting
12:02:15 <zodbot> Meeting started Wed Sep 17 12:02:15 2014 UTC.  The chair is JustinClift. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
12:02:15 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
12:02:24 <JustinClift> Who's around? :)
12:03:37 <JustinClift> Haalllooooooo ?
12:04:03 * msvbhat is pesent
12:04:21 * davemc is here
12:04:21 <JustinClift> msvbhat: Thx.  I was thinking I got the time wrong
12:04:28 * hagarth is here
12:04:33 * kkeithley is here
12:04:36 <msvbhat> JustinClift: :)
12:04:37 * davemc is multitasking
12:04:47 <JustinClift> Cool
12:04:56 <JustinClift> Etherpad: https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-community-meetings
12:05:38 <JustinClift> #topic Action items from previous meetings
12:05:47 <JustinClift> "davemc to get the GlusterFS Consultants and Support Company's page online by the end of this week"
12:05:52 <JustinClift> davemc: How's that looking?
12:06:13 <davemc> not done.  I'm trying to figure out how te site works without blowing it up
12:06:22 <davemc> hopefully soon, though
12:07:14 <JustinClift> davemc: k.  Engage people in the osas channels on RH irc, as the main authors hang out there :)
12:07:38 <JustinClift> davemc: Even stuff like "what do I need to type to make this next bit work? or "what's this mean?""
12:07:52 <davemc> yessir
12:07:54 <JustinClift> "kkeithley to chase pranithk about https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127140"
12:07:55 <glusterbot> Bug 1127140: unspecified, unspecified, 3.4.6, gluster-bugs, NEW , memory leak
12:08:08 <davemc> I think it PEBKAC
12:08:33 <kkeithley> I did chase him.
12:08:41 <JustinClift> davemc: PEBKAC is fine.  Engage ppl there, and we'll walk you through it :)
12:09:12 <kkeithley> He and Poornima a working on the Denali release and prob won't have time to investigate 'til after that. 3.4.6beta2 is on hold until then
12:09:19 <JustinClift> kkeithley: Np
12:09:30 <JustinClift> Yeah, there's a bunch of patches which are outstanding for things atm
12:09:40 <JustinClift> "lalatenduM to create blog post about GlusterFS 3.4.6beta1 rpms being available on the download server"
12:09:43 <JustinClift> Done
12:09:46 <JustinClift> "JustinClift and lalatenduM to ensure lalatenduM has a blog account"
12:09:47 <JustinClift> Done
12:09:52 <JustinClift> "ndevos and hagarth to discuss the outstanding 3.5.3 blocker BZ's, and which ones to move to 3.5.4"
12:09:55 <JustinClift> ndevos: ?
12:10:11 <hagarth> not yet
12:10:45 <JustinClift> ETA?
12:11:01 <JustinClift> _Realistic_ eta? (just saying) :)
12:11:12 <hagarth> eta: by next week's meeting
12:12:00 <JustinClift> #action ndevos and hagarth to discuss on gluster-devel (by 24th Sept) the outstanding 3.5.3 blocker BZ's, and which ones to move to 3.5.4
12:12:18 <JustinClift> #action davemc to get the GlusterFS Consultants and Support Company's page online
12:12:34 <JustinClift> "JustinClift to ping David Robinson (Corvid Tech) to see if they will have time to test 3.6 beta"
12:12:49 <JustinClift> Email them.  David's travelling, but will try to do so.
12:12:56 <JustinClift> "hagarth, JustinClift and davemc to sync up on 3.6.0 launch plan offline"
12:13:03 <JustinClift> We have a meeting scheduled for later on today.
12:13:07 <JustinClift> "kkeithley to put 3.6.0 beta / rc on the Longevity Cluster"
12:13:14 <JustinClift> How's that go? :)
12:13:24 <kkeithley> I didn't do that
12:13:35 <JustinClift> Yeah, it kind of needs beta to be released first eh?
12:13:42 <JustinClift> Lets wait for that to happen...
12:13:56 <kkeithley> I was kinda thinking that was a "could we do it" and the answer is "yes we can".
12:14:09 <kkeithley> Right, when there's something worth running
12:14:13 <kkeithley> like a beta
12:14:14 <JustinClift> Yeah
12:14:18 <JustinClift> k, moving
12:14:19 <JustinClift> on
12:14:23 <JustinClift> #topic 3.4
12:14:40 <JustinClift> How's this looking?
12:15:34 <JustinClift> There are a _lot_ of open CR's on the release-3.4 branch atm: kkeithley to put 3.6.0 beta / rc on the Longevity Cluster
12:16:09 <JustinClift> http://review.gluster.org/#/q/status:open+project:glusterfs+branch:release-3.4,n,z
12:16:15 <JustinClift> Bad cut-n-paste ;)
12:16:16 <kkeithley> There are some fixes for dht IIRC
12:16:17 <hagarth> mostly they seem to be dht fixes
12:16:23 <JustinClift> Yeah
12:16:31 <kkeithley> yes. I'll get those merged today if they have +2
12:16:32 <hagarth> i can help with reviews once the regression run is clean
12:16:56 <JustinClift> kkeithley: There's something wrong with at least one of them, that's causing the ones dependant on it to fail regression testing
12:16:59 * jdarcy sneaks in and sits in the back.
12:17:09 * JustinClift throws popcorn at jdarcy
12:17:30 <hagarth> maybe we should trigger regression runs again?
12:17:52 <JustinClift> hagarth: I've done it a few times for some of them.  I don't suppose it'd hurt to try again.
12:17:56 <jdarcy> Sorry for being late, but which patches are we talking about?
12:18:03 <JustinClift> jdarcy: http://review.gluster.org/#/q/status:open+project:glusterfs+branch:release-3.4,n,z
12:18:08 <jdarcy> Thanks.
12:18:11 <JustinClift> Outstanding dht from for release-3.4
12:18:46 <JustinClift> I guess this is mostly just blocked on those, and - if the retriggered regression tests don't all pass - we'll just need to wait for them to be fixed
12:19:01 <JustinClift> It's probably less urgent than the Denali and our upstream 3.6.0 stuff though
12:19:12 <JustinClift> 3.4.x is generally fairly stable...
12:19:51 <hagarth> JustinClift: some of these fixes would make 3.4.x more robust .. would be good to have them in soon.
12:19:56 <JustinClift> #action JustinClift to retrigger regression runs for the failed release-3.4 CR's
12:19:57 <kkeithley> except for the client-side memory leak
12:20:13 <kkeithley> it's stable except for the client-side memory leak
12:20:37 <JustinClift> hagarth: Yeah, I'm not saying they wouldn't help.  I'm just wondering if we're hitting resourcing problems (Raghavendra G's time), so maybe having to delay
12:21:07 <hagarth> JustinClift: right, I will check with Raghavendra G to see when he can take a re-look at this.
12:21:10 <JustinClift> kkeithley: No-one that's experiencing the client-side memory leak has the time/skill to diagnose it though. :/
12:21:16 <JustinClift> hagarth: AI that :)
12:21:18 <jdarcy> Looks like http://review.gluster.org/#/c/8671/1 was the first to fail.  It's a faithful reproduction of the version on master, so not clear how it might be interacting with 3.4-specific code.
12:21:51 <kkeithley> It's in 3.5 also
12:21:55 <hagarth> #action hagarth to work with Raghavendra G on dht bug fixes for 3.4.x
12:22:06 <JustinClift> jdarcy: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/8671 passed didn't it ?
12:22:20 <kkeithley> Well, that's Pranith and Poornima, and they're busy on Denali
12:22:58 <JustinClift> jdarcy: You're meaning http://review.gluster.org/#/c/8672/ I guess
12:23:01 <jdarcy> Oh, right.  It's the next one, which is (gulp) a port of mine.
12:23:10 * JustinClift throws more popcorn
12:23:30 <JustinClift> Anyway, lets let Raghavendra G have at it first, and take it from there
12:23:38 <JustinClift> Moving on....
12:23:44 <kkeithley> The client-side leak is in 3.5. also
12:23:44 <JustinClift> #topic 3.5
12:24:19 <JustinClift> kkeithley: Does that help us get someont to investigate/debug it?
12:25:09 <JustinClift> jdarcy: btw https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-community-meetings
12:25:12 <hagarth> JustinClift: let us check with R G
12:25:44 <JustinClift> k, is anyone around atm that knows the status of 3.5.4?
12:26:00 <JustinClift> hagarth: Guessing that's the AI from earlier for yourself and ndevos...
12:26:00 <hagarth> JustinClift: nope, ndevos is busy this week
12:26:08 <JustinClift> k, lets move on. :)
12:26:09 <kkeithley> 3.5.2
12:26:25 <kkeithley> Niels is out for training this week (Ceph!)
12:26:25 <JustinClift> Yeah, typo there
12:26:54 <JustinClift> Awesome.  We'll need to have a brainwashing session when he gets back, to return him to the good side of the force... :p
12:27:07 <JustinClift> #topic 3.6
12:27:18 <JustinClift> hagarth: This is your baby.  How's this looking?
12:27:26 <hagarth> JustinClift: looking very good!
12:27:45 <hagarth> we have quite a lot of good fixes merged in 3.6 now
12:27:46 <JustinClift> The list here seems to be shrinking: http://review.gluster.org/#/q/status:open+project:glusterfs+branch:release-3.6,n,z
12:27:58 <hagarth> i am planning to have a beta release out this week
12:28:19 <hagarth> me and hchiramm__ have been planning logistics for a test week over the next week
12:28:38 <hagarth> hchiramm__: if you are around, can you please share some updates about the test week?
12:28:40 <JustinClift> Cool. :)
12:28:49 <Humble> hagarth, sure
12:29:03 <Humble> planning to start from next monday
12:29:06 <hagarth> hchiramm__: oops, never noticed your alter ego
12:29:10 <Humble> :)
12:29:38 <JustinClift> Cool.  Is that Planning36 page accurate still then?
12:29:42 <JustinClift> http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Planning36
12:29:46 <Humble> http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/3.6_test_day
12:29:50 <Humble> JustinClift, ^^^
12:30:10 <JustinClift> Cool.  Can you please link to the test page from the planning page?
12:30:11 <Humble> gathering the required information on above URL ..
12:30:20 <Humble> JustinClift, will do..
12:30:32 <JustinClift> And probably also worth emailing gluster-users and gluster-devel, letting them know about it
12:30:39 <JustinClift> We've been pretty quiet about it so far
12:30:42 <Humble> yep.. will be doing it soon..
12:30:56 <hagarth> JustinClift: mostly accurate, apart from the test weekend dates. We will decide on a GA date based on the feedback we get during the test week.
12:31:23 <Humble> still need some update from component owners on "HOW TO TEST " section on feature pages
12:31:26 <JustinClift> #action Humble to email gluster-devel and gluster-users about the upcoming test day, and including thest 3.6_test_day page
12:31:51 <JustinClift> Humble: Cool.  Please chase the component owners to get it done
12:31:52 <JustinClift> :)
12:32:02 <Humble> hagarth, if u can help here :)
12:32:08 <JustinClift> k, is there anything else for 3.6 we need to cover?
12:32:13 <hagarth> Humble: happy to help with the chasing :)
12:32:16 <Humble> hagarth++ thanks !
12:32:31 <JustinClift> Moving on....
12:32:35 <JustinClift> #topic Other items to discuss
12:32:40 <JustinClift> Anyone have stuff?
12:33:02 <JustinClift> k, I think we're good. :)
12:33:04 <JustinClift> #endmeeting