14:12:45 #startmeeting 14:12:46 Meeting started Sun Jan 31 14:12:45 2010 UTC. The chair is mchua. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:12:47 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 14:12:53 #chair spevack RodrigoPadula dgilmore 14:12:54 Current chairs: RodrigoPadula dgilmore mchua spevack 14:17:53 I'm pulling together a list of the pages/resources we have right now, so you folks have a list of things from which to work. 14:18:15 (It's a temporary hack - these pages need to be properly linked to each other and categorized and whatnot - but I'm just dumping all the links into one section of the Events FAD page for now.) 14:19:33 mchua, ok 14:24:44 * spevack does a bit of editing of the main FUDCon Santiago page 14:24:55 and start working up a list of questions for Rodrigo 14:25:57 RodrigoPadula: does Antonio Salles call himself Sebastian? Why is that the name you have listed? 14:25:58 spevack: I'm still cleaning up links (and fixing typos) but https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Events_FAD_2010#Pages_we.27ve_worked_on is a handy dandy reference list, mostly pulled from your email right now. 14:26:37 Antonio Sebastian Salles 14:26:53 asalles en el IRC 14:27:21 Sebá para nosotros :-) 14:29:33 RodrigoPadula: http://www.ucentral.cl/prontus_ucentral/site/edic/base/port/inicio.html 14:29:37 this is the right university? 14:30:20 yep 14:30:43 Sebastian works for Red Hat in chile 14:31:16 and he is responsible by the local fedora team and the LUG UCENTUX in the Universidad Central 14:33:26 * mchua will be lurking and working on other FAD stuff, but ping if needed (particularly if we need to quickly revise any of the docs you're using for reference). 14:35:54 0/g 2 14:36:19 RodrigoPadula: here's the first thing that you can do: 14:36:35 Remind me EXACTLY what the possible dates you are thinking about for FUDCon are, and then let's figure out how to decide 14:37:09 The idea is to realize the FUDCOn one week before or after fisl 14:37:20 right -- so how will we decide which one? 14:37:39 based on Budget 14:37:49 and the people that are interested to attend 14:37:55 specially from USA/Europe 14:38:10 people that will be supported with our budget 14:38:20 when is fisl? 14:38:28 21 - 24 July 14:39:09 where is the website for FISL? 14:39:11 so we can link to it> 14:41:17 http://fisl.softwarelivre.org/10/www/ 14:41:29 10 was last year? 14:41:53 so, they haven't officially announced those dates of 21 - 24 July yet? 14:42:01 how can we be 100% sure? 14:42:05 the site is under construction 14:42:07 yes, but they haven't removed anything 14:42:08 ok 14:42:13 but the official announcemente was published 14:42:34 So we need to do FUDCon 17-19 July, IMHO 14:42:53 http://softwarelivre.org/portal/comunidade/definida-a-data-do-forum-internacional-software-livre-2010 14:43:23 then people can travel on 20 July, and still get to FISL on time. 14:43:53 what do you think, RodrigoPadula 14:45:14 I think we can do 14-16 or 29-31 14:45:41 what will people do with all the time in between? 14:46:02 help to finish the other event ? 14:46:36 we need some days between to fix any problem 14:47:16 You are hoping that people will go to BOTH FUDCon and FISL, right? 14:47:38 some people , sure 14:47:42 And you think that someone who comes to one of those two events will want to hang out for 4 days or 5 days until the next one starts? I think the person will go home :) 14:47:53 as I told you, July is vacations month in Latam 14:48:45 Are there any dates from the University that are good or bad? Do they care when we have FUDCon? 14:48:57 yes 14:49:18 because is very complicated to do the event during the week by example 14:49:24 RodrigoPadula: let me put it this way -- anyone from USA/Europe who comes will not be able to wait 4 or 5 days between FUDCon and FISL, I think. dgilmore what do you think? 14:49:31 when the students are in the university using all the infra 14:49:53 RodrigoPadula: if it is complicated to do it during the week, why are you suggesting 14-16, which is Wednesday - Friday? 14:50:14 the FISL for example is very tiring 14:50:36 during the week when people is using the infra 14:50:45 July they will be in vacations 14:52:15 do you think the wiki page needs to be written in Spanish? 14:52:31 or is english ok? 14:52:32 spevack: While i would need to either travel and stay at someones house or stay in a hotel for extra time. i could work from there. however that all means extra cost. whihc probably means going to only one 14:52:50 I think we can write in english 14:53:06 I will provide info in portuguese and spanish to our local lists 14:53:07 spevack: I think it should be written in english. maybe with portugese and spanish translations 14:53:16 giving all orientations 14:54:28 spevack, I have to know we will organise something like the last years for FISL 14:54:42 so, if we will invite people from USA to attend FISL 14:54:52 and invite people to attend FUDCon 14:55:12 will be more cheap to invite the same people to come and stay for 2 events 14:56:06 the local people will pay by extra time 14:56:27 We will support only people from USA that come to attend the 2 events 14:56:44 RodrigoPadula: what makes the weekend better for the university than during the week if they are closed on vacations? 14:57:05 they are not completely closed 14:58:00 the Latam universities works normally all the year from Monday to Friday 14:58:23 RodrigoPadula: doing 3 days means we are on one week day 14:59:20 the idea is to realize the event from Thursday to Saturday 14:59:23 RodrigoPadula: let me ask you a question. 14:59:31 like all events in Brazil and Latam 14:59:47 Can you get Sebastian here, since he is the University Guy, to tell us what dates are 100% best for the university? 14:59:48 that starts on Wednesday or thursday and goes until Saturday 15:00:06 I had that conversation with him 15:00:16 RodrigoPadula: i think 17-19 would be good 15:01:04 RodrigoPadula: a few minutes ago you said 14-16 july 15:01:08 now you said thursday - saturday 15:01:10 which is 15 - 17 15:01:39 ops.. 15 - 17 15:01:42 my bad 15:02:32 Monday and Sunday are not good days for events :-) 15:03:20 RodrigoPadula: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Santiago_2010#Location 15:04:18 RodrigoPadula: also, finish filling out your registration, so we can see if it makes sense ;) 15:04:29 ok 15:04:36 I will talk with Sebastian again 15:04:44 and with the people that are interested to attend 15:04:57 RodrigoPadula: I think we should all talk to him together 15:05:17 ok 15:06:31 So, we need to schedule a meeting with him 15:06:51 Tomorrow I will try to talk with him 15:06:58 or, you can send one email 15:07:27 asalles@redhat.com 15:10:09 spevack, do you have idea of the amount of budget that we will have disponible for FISL and for FUDCon ? 15:10:55 RodrigoPadula: do you have an idea of how much budget RH LATAM is going to provide first? 15:11:05 Then we will provide the rest? 15:11:12 RodrigoPadula: where is your budget plan for FY11? 15:11:33 YOU are in charge of Community in LATAM. You should have the budget plan that shows "I need $X from RH LATAM and $Y from CommArch" 15:12:18 the problem is: we dont have a budget form Latam defined by Martin 15:12:32 * for 15:12:42 * mchua /win 35 15:12:48 whoops. sorry, irssi slip. 15:13:29 I can't make a plan without budget 15:14:02 RodrigoPadula: i understand that. 15:14:34 But whe *I* need to make a plan, I don't say to my boss "how much budget can I have?" I *make a plan* and say "do you like this plan? If you do, then here is how much budget I need." 15:14:45 * mchua pokes head in. Could I request some QA for the stuff we're making for the FAD? 15:15:01 spevack, sure 15:15:09 It's meant to be a resource/guide for making FUDCons, so it might not be a bad idea to use it so y'all can tell me and ctyler what to fix, while we're still working on it. ;) 15:15:13 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon_organization_process 15:15:22 but in all conversations that I have I received one "Talk to max about budget" 15:15:31 * I had 15:15:36 I'd say we're at the "Decision" point in your process, mchua 15:16:16 But RodrigoPadula until we have an idea of hotel costs, food costs, social event ideas -- it is *impossible* to have any fixed budget. 15:16:23 YOU HAVE RESEARCH TO DO. 15:16:31 THIS IS WHAT THE LOCAL TEAM OF PEOPLE IN CHILE IS SUPPOSED TO HELP YOU WITH 15:16:43 spevack, sur, but we need to have a number I think 15:16:50 like past year 15:16:57 spevack, RodrigoPadula: what would be helpful to myself and Chris, if you have time, is to walk through that schedule and talk about what that process will look like for FUDCon LATAM specifically. 15:17:44 mchua, ok 15:17:44 Such as: what do the FUDCon LATAM bids look like when put into the format specified in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon_bid_process ? 15:17:47 (and does that format help?) 15:17:55 RodrigoPadula: you need to work out what you want to do what it will cost. then it can be evaluated and given a yes/no. the plans can then be adjusted to suit what comes back. 15:17:56 RodrigoPadula: well, if we're just going to make up numbers, why don't you make one up. you pick one :) 15:17:57 (the format: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon_bid_process#Proposal_Process:) 15:18:42 I have all prices of hotels and air tickets 15:18:49 then why isn't it on the wiki page? 15:19:07 because it was created yesterday :-) 15:19:10 until you share what you already know in your head, we can't help you! :) 15:19:13 ...I know you haven't got a location yet, but after figuring out what #actions to line up to go through the decision process, walking through https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon_organization_process#FUDcon_Team_General_Planning_Schedule and saying "what does this look like? who would do it?" for each bullet point would be really, really helpful. 15:20:57 mchua: you envision a list of cities, each of which provides a certain chunk of information? 15:22:13 spevack: Yes. 15:22:28 RodrigoPadula: i want to help you, but I don't understand *HOW* I can help you. 15:22:41 spevack: Well, as "upstream" for the FUDCon Planning Process, I'm less concerned with the individual cities data, and whether the process we've created is the right one. 15:22:50 I've been working on FUDCon LATAM stuff for an hour, and every single thing I've done is something that you could have already done yourself. 15:22:51 spevack: may I suggest something? 15:22:56 sure 15:23:13 mchua: i think the questions you ask in "proposal process" are great 15:23:21 and that RodrigoPadula should answer each one of them for Chile 15:24:07 I think I remember spevack saying, the other day, something like "when dgilmore and I talk with RodrigoPadula about FUDCon LATAM, the help we're going to be giving is 'we give resources for FUDCons via this process... how closely are you following the process, and how can we help you follow the process - or how can we fix the process, if it's broken?" 15:24:21 * mchua paraphrasing a lot, since I don't remember the exact wording. 15:24:38 right 15:24:58 So in my mind, the question about budget is a "look at the wiki page for process. Where do you get to the budget part? Are we at that point now, and have we fulfilled the prerequisites necessary to get to the budget part?" question. 15:25:15 RodrigoPadula: i think the very next thing that you should do is look at the questions https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon_bid_process#Proposal_Process: 15:25:22 and produce the answers for Santiago 15:25:29 And if Chris and I have totally screwed up what the budget part should look like, and when it should be handled, then that's something you have to let us know so we can fix it. 15:25:36 because that is the first step of the "choosing a location" process, and we need that information first. 15:25:45 A lot of that information goes right on to the FUDCon Santiago page anyway. 15:25:51 Brasil -> Santiago US$420,00 15:25:51 Argentina -> Santiago US$160.00 15:25:51 Paraguay -> Santiago US$250.00 15:25:51 Peru -> Santiago US$240.00 15:25:51 Venezuela -> Santiago US$810.00 15:25:52 Mexico -> Santiago US$950.00 15:25:54 Raleigh USA -> Santiago $US1300.00 15:26:01 I found the spreadsheet 15:26:27 these are the costs for flights from many countries to Santiago - Chile in July 15:26:50 the hotel cost is ~US$120 single room 15:27:08 and US$160.00 double 15:28:47 RodrigoPadula: we should use double/triple sharing of rooms 15:28:49 RodrigoPadula, would you mind if I made a section on the FUDCon LATAM planning wiki page for this information (and put a link to "this information is from following the bid process" at the top) so we have an example of a FUDCon beginning to work through this process? 15:29:00 dgilmore, sure 15:29:06 Like in FISL we will do it 15:29:55 mchua, ok, I will read all the wiki and use it as reference 15:31:44 RodrigoPadula: Thanks. In the meantime, I'll start a section for the bid answers - I'll be back in a few minutes with a link, and then you can tell me whether it's ok. 15:32:01 mchua, ok 15:35:48 RodrigoPadula: another suggestion that I would recommend is that you have EVERY CONVERSATION with anyone related to FUDCon Santiago on the fudcon-planning list, or on IRC, and then you post the log to the list. 15:35:59 You should not have any more private conversations about FUDCon Santiago that don't get shared. 15:36:04 mchua: your thoughts on the above? 15:36:13 because it just makes information sharing so much harder. 15:36:19 spevack, ok, but some conversations are in portuguese and spanish 15:36:23 that's ok 15:36:29 we can still translate it and have some information 15:36:33 and that's better than zero information 15:36:50 spevack: i fully agree 15:37:06 ugese or spanish is fine 15:37:09 it will be complicated to do, but ok 15:37:24 RodrigoPadula: part of the issue we're having today, and part of the reason why I feel frustrated, is because I feel like I have no information, but yet I am expected to make decisions. 15:37:25 RodrigoPadula: portugese or spanish is fine on fudcon-planning 15:37:38 I'm not frustrated w/ you, Rodrigo. Just the situation. 15:37:39 :) 15:37:46 RodrigoPadula: why is it complicated? 15:38:04 You ask the FUDCon Chile folks -- starting with Sebastian -- to get on the fudcon-planning list, and you send your emails there. Not that hard :) 15:38:20 :-) is very hard to find people on IRC to talk 15:38:33 RodrigoPadula: then do it on email :) 15:38:33 so, many conversations is on our lists or by Gtalk 15:38:51 RodrigoPadula: which lists? 15:38:58 brasil and latam 15:39:08 * mchua looks up - I've got stub pages now 15:39:11 * mchua reading 15:39:20 but ok, I will do it here 15:39:33 RodrigoPadula: FUDCon things should move to fudcon-planning. talking in portugese or spanish is ok on there 15:39:52 RodrigoPadula: I agree with spevack's suggestion that all FUDCon LATAM conversations get logged here, and sent to list. In fact, that's something we may want to make a requirement in the FUDCon planning process itself. 15:39:56 Thanks for pointing that out. 15:39:58 I'll make that edit in a moment. 15:40:04 spevack, We started to create the wiki page yesterday, so all information will be added this week 15:40:22 RodrigoPadula: Oh - major wiki edits are also good things to announce to the fudcon-planning list, too. 15:40:32 * mchua adds that to "list of edits to make to the fudcon planning process" 15:40:52 RodrigoPadula: You've started doing that already, with your first announcement of the page the other day. 15:41:01 RodrigoPadula: is there anything else I can do for you today? 15:41:05 Which is great - so keep it up. :) 15:41:17 spevack: I've got something for you and RodrigoPadula to work on, actually 15:41:25 Sooo, I started stubs for the first part of the planning process. 15:41:27 Which is the bid process. 15:41:29 * mchua pulls up links 15:41:39 I think it's important to know the $$ of budget that we will have to work 15:41:42 for FISL and FUDCon 15:41:50 * mchua is getting to that 15:42:03 So, what I did - I went to the https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Santiago_2010 page 15:42:13 and made a planning page - it's linked to from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Santiago_2010#Planning_team 15:42:21 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Santiago_2010_planning 15:42:45 is the planning page. If you go there, you'll see that it links to the [[FUDCon organization process]] page 15:43:17 and basically is starting to be organized in a parallel structure, except with the sections being specific to this FUDCon instead of "here's how you do a FUDCon generally." 15:43:26 RodrigoPadula: well, FISL is a normal Fedora event. 15:43:34 It's a big one, but it's just a normal event. 15:43:40 Similar to FOSDEM. 15:43:55 Right, which is why I've just made this stuff for the FUDCon planning. 15:43:59 * mchua keeps on going 15:44:02 Our budget for FOSDEM is probably about $3,000 USD including swag, travel, booth, etc. 15:44:13 spevack, Ok 15:44:30 spevack: iow, "FISL is out of the scope of this conversation"? 15:44:36 spevack, that's Ok for FISL 15:44:43 So, for FUDCon... 15:44:59 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Santiago_2010_planning has a section for bid process, which is the first part of "how to plan a FUDCon." 15:45:08 And I made a subpage for sanity. 15:45:11 If you want an initial estimate for FUDCon Santiago, I'd start with $10,000 USD and I'd ask to see your proposal with that amount. Depending on what you and the fudcon team come back with, we'll see if we need to raise it. 15:45:12 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Santiago_2010_planning/Bid_process 15:45:27 spevack: I was about to ask you for that, actually :) 15:45:42 If you look at the link I just posted, it links to the [[FUDCon bid process]] page 15:45:49 and, again, basically just tries to follow it. 15:46:15 The first part of the bid process is an RFP - and I believe that's spevack, but I'm not sure where our RFP for this FUDCon is. 15:46:25 RodrigoPadula: if you say "we will spend $2,000 USD on a Fedora ski day", I will say "that is a bad idea" :D 15:46:49 spevack, no, it will be extra 15:46:57 RodrigoPadula: i'm just joking 15:47:03 :-) 15:47:06 i know you won't spend our budget on skiing :) 15:47:09 spevack: "CommArch shall make known via the FUDcon-planning mailing list the estimated available budget for a FUDcon, and the preferred date(s) for a region. This announcement shall occur at least 12 months prior to the preferred dates announced." 15:47:14 is what we have for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon_bid_process#Initial_RFP 15:47:31 ...now, for this FUDCon, we may have to make an exemption for some of the deadlines outlined in our planning. 15:47:39 It's free software, not free beer or free skiing :-) 15:47:41 mchua: yeah, i think we will 15:47:43 That's ok, but we should keep track of those diffs so that they're clear. 15:48:09 or maybe the process needs to be tweaked - ie instead of dates - date range, quarter, etc. 15:48:16 ke4qqq: good point. 15:48:28 Ok, with a number is better to organize the ideas and study all possibilities 15:48:32 spevack, RodrigoPadula: you may notice there are two sections to this page 15:48:42 and one needs to be done by spevack and one needs to be done by RodrigoPadula 15:48:42 the idea of that fudcon is to increase the RPMDEV group 15:48:50 (according to the process that we have) 15:49:00 so, we will initially support the people that are working there 15:49:06 RodrigoPadula: your section is the "Proposal Process" section. 15:49:28 mchua: ok, i'll fill out my section 15:49:44 and I'm thinking to help one contributor from each country 15:49:47 RodrigoPadula: I linked to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon_bid_process#Proposal_Process in your section on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Santiago_2010_planning/Bid_process 15:50:11 RodrigoPadula: and copy-pasted the template for one city - so if you can fill that in for Santiago, that would be great. 15:50:15 it's very important to share experiences 15:50:34 If we have bids/data from cities other than Santiago, those should go there too, but it sounds like there may just be one major bid (Santiago) right now. 15:50:37 And that's ok. 15:51:33 RodrigoPadula: Yep - very important to share experiences. Which is why I (and spevack, I think) are saying things like "we should talk on the fudcon-planning list" or "we should have all conversations in this channel, and log them" 15:51:45 RodrigoPadula: because we also need to share experiences among planners of FUDCons. 15:52:09 sure 15:52:37 last year the FUDCon was organized in a hurry 15:52:49 and we didnt publicated a lot of info 15:53:10 this FAD is helping a lot to organize the process 15:53:15 * mchua nods 15:53:19 Well, that's what we hoped :) 15:53:28 I mean, I remember having a hard time with FUDCon Toronto 15:53:42 and that was with Paul and Chris doing the vast majority of the work, and me mostly following along. 15:53:43 startgin by the infor organization and decisions 15:53:57 Yep. 15:54:19 last year I've organized the Latam FUDcon alone! 15:54:28 Well, the hope of this FAD (at least for me) is that we come out with a process - that's really well documented - that can guide just about any Fedora contributor through making a good FUDCon happen. 15:54:35 RodrigoPadula: yikes. I... can't even imagine what that's like. 15:54:48 * mchua was pretty dead after organizing 1/3rd of FUDCon Toronto 15:55:06 (well, by "pretty dead" I mean "I went home and slept for 9 hours, which is a lot for me") 15:55:11 (but in my book, that's "Mel is very tired") 15:55:13 Me, myself and Ireneless :-) 15:55:22 * mchua needs to see that movie 15:55:29 :-) 15:56:13 and I was responsible by the Red Hat participation too 15:56:26 Ok - I'm going to pop out of this conversation for a few minutes to put the edits we came up with (the notes that we should be using the fudcon-planning list, and this IRC channel, and such) into the https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon_organization_process page that Chris and I are working on, I'll be back in a few minutes. 15:56:28 booth for Fedora... booth for red hat... stuffs for Red hat and for fedora 15:56:41 RodrigoPadula, spevack: I'll ping you when I'm back, ping me if you finish your sections first 15:56:57 Ok 15:57:06 I will read and work on it now 15:57:16 So, where I have to start ? 15:57:49 readind... and later writing 15:58:35 RodrigoPadula: Yep - your section is on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Santiago_2010_planning/Bid_process 15:58:43 the "proposal process" section 15:58:46 RodrigoPadula: it is also important to realize the FUDcon and FISL are two separate things 15:58:49 RodrigoPadula: i think it would be good for you to read over the planning pages created this weekend and ask any questions you come up with 15:58:52 maybe some people will attend both 15:59:05 and maybe we will have a section of the FUDCon page that says "tips for people who are also going to FISL" 15:59:10 spevack, sure, I have it in mind 15:59:12 but we MUST organize the events separately 15:59:17 RodrigoPadula: good, i'm glad we agree 15:59:42 dgilmore: Yeah, I think that at the end of this meeting we should all step back and look at all the process pages, and which ones we've worked through, and hear what RodrigoPadula's plan is for working through the rest (and giving feedback on the fudcon-planning list) 16:00:00 and I will work to request local budget for FISL and FUDCon and we can try to save your budget 16:00:05 but right now, RodrigoPadula's looking at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon_bid_process#Proposal_Process for filling out https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Santiago_2010_planning/Bid_process. 16:00:12 * mchua really goes to work on that page with Chris now 16:01:42 before the brazilian carnaval! 16:02:16 Brazilians starts to work hard only after it :-) 16:02:33 Feb 12-17 16:05:30 hey, yn1v - I'll try to find you the backlog so you can catch up. 16:05:56 yn1v: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fudcon-planning/2010-01-31/fudcon-planning.2010-01-31-14.12.log.txt is the long, long log. 16:06:04 yn1v: but the shorter version... 16:06:23 is that we're testing out the FUDCon planning process we've designed at the Events FAD (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Events_FAD_2010) 16:06:29 with Rodrigo, for FUDCon LATAM. 16:06:51 (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Santiago_2010) 16:07:21 yn1v: so we're making https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Santiago_2010_planning a place to work through https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon_organization_process 16:07:43 yn1v: and the first part of that is working through the https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon_bid_process at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Santiago_2010_planning/Bid_process 16:07:46 lots of things to read :) 16:07:53 yn1v: and that last page is what spevack and RodrigoPadula are working on right now. 16:08:10 yn1v: yeah :) but the most important right now to catch up on what's going on are the last two links. 16:08:13 The rest are mostly for context. 16:16:34 mchua, what is CommArch ? 16:17:57 yn1v, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CommArch 16:17:58 spevack: ^^ :) 16:18:22 thanks 16:32:51 yn1v: in other words, CommArch == "so, Mel, Max, Karsten, Greg... what do you do at Red Hat, exactly?" 16:33:53 mchua, thanks. Now I know 16:35:26 spevack, RodrigoPadula: how's it going? 16:36:32 mchua, I'm reading all documents first :-) 16:37:11 and thinking before write, first I have to think in portuguese :-) 16:37:42 yessir. :) 16:40:00 * mchua committed our patch - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon_organization_process#Communications 16:49:22 * RodrigoPadula thinks that we need to update the channel subject 16:59:22 Hm. Who's an op? 16:59:34 asalles, estas?? 16:59:42 aca 16:59:45 holas 16:59:54 estavamos hablando acerca de la fecha 17:00:10 ok. post fisl? 17:00:27 stickster: o mighty channel op, can haz change topic? 17:00:53 * mchua waves to asalles - thanks for joining us! 17:00:53 y yo estava hablando que seria mejor algo como 1 semana antes 17:00:56 o una semana despues 17:01:11 hola asalles 17:01:16 hola hola 17:01:21 15-17 o 28-30 17:01:27 primera semana de agosto? 17:01:29 pues son vacaciones aca 17:01:33 July 17:01:57 de manera que personas puedan viajar para FISL y en sequencia para Santiago o o contrario 17:02:22 ojo que en esa fecha la ucentral va a estar cerrada por vacaciones 17:02:28 el 15 salen de vacaciones 17:02:28 creo que domingo y lunes no sean buenos dias como recomendado por Max 17:02:52 queadar completamente cerrada ? 17:03:01 no, no completamente 17:03:02 los chicos me dicieran q seria la mejor fecha 17:03:12 pues la infra quedaria libre 17:03:21 15 a 17 sería bueno, podría arreglar el tema en la universidad 17:03:33 pero 28-30 dudo que sea bueno 17:03:46 puede hablar con ellos entonces para saber la mejor fechar ? 17:03:56 * fecha 17:05:11 asalles: What dates work best for the university? 17:06:27 ok, yo veo eso 17:06:29 vea se es mejor mantener Julio o cambiamos a otro mes entonces 17:06:37 no habría problema a primera vista 17:06:44 vea exatamente que mes seria el mejor 17:06:49 la mejor fecha sería julio 15-7 o sino en agosto 17:06:55 tanto para los embajadores locales, para usted y para la universidad 17:06:58 asalles: will 16-18 work or 17-19? 17:07:37 16-17-18 i think is the best but i need to talk to university 17:08:05 Domingo ? 17:08:16 sip 17:08:20 creo que no es un buen dia para eventos 17:08:23 por eso, tengo que preguntar mañana en la universidad 17:08:23 asalles: :) awesome, please do and let usknow on fudcon-planing@lists.fedoraproject.org 17:08:32 siempre tuve problemas con esta fechar 17:08:46 el publico y la participacion es siempre muy pequeña en los domingos 17:08:58 partir un jueves es complicado 17:09:32 porque no habría mucho quorum 17:09:45 teneremos un publico especifico 17:09:51 que horario es? 17:09:53 y la idea de la FUDCOn es mas los embajadores 17:09:57 todo el dia 17:10:04 ok, entiendo 17:10:16 la participacion externa es bienvenida 17:10:28 pero el foco es fedora y los muchachos que ya trabajam alla 17:10:36 si, entiendo 17:10:37 mira, mañana voy a preguntar en la universidad la disponibilidad de infraestructura para ésas fechas y horarios 17:10:47 Ok 17:10:56 y vea la possibilidad de otras fechas 17:11:05 es posible que esté reservado para algun otro evento, asi que tengo que realizar lobby 17:11:05 em otros meses y que pensa la universidad acerca 17:11:15 ;-) 17:11:19 ;) 17:11:42 seria muy important organizarmos una reunion con todos los embajadores activos de chile 17:11:47 esta semana 17:12:07 es cosa de mandar un correo con tiempo 17:12:12 RodrigoPadula: The idea of a fudcon is to bring Users and developers together 17:12:13 porque acá en chile estamos en vacaciones 17:12:20 RodrigoPadula: its not just about ambasadors 17:12:22 muchos están sin pc, desconectados del mundo 17:12:30 dgilmore, sure 17:12:37 RodrigoPadula: we want the general community to come and learn about fedora 17:12:41 but the focus is to produce something 17:12:55 RodrigoPadula: there is no single focus 17:13:00 I think... that FUDCon need a more teach focus 17:13:06 RodrigoPadula: A FAD is single focus 17:13:14 a FUDCon has multiple 17:13:15 because is that we need to improve in our local community 17:13:45 Teaching is a big part of it. 17:13:53 sure 17:14:04 teaching tech issues :-) 17:14:12 But that teaching should cover from new users to new contributors to seasoned users and contributors 17:14:31 do you remember de last fudcon latam ? 17:14:32 RodrigoPadula: Teaching everything not just advanced technical issues 17:14:36 Yes 17:14:55 was good, with focus in many areas, but we produced nothing 17:15:02 because the focus was general 17:15:15 RodrigoPadula: im saying we need to cover the higher technical things we have talked about but we need to not forget the new users who have never used fedora 17:15:31 sure 17:15:36 we will cover many areas 17:15:49 but the focus will be on a specific area RPM/DEV 17:16:16 this kind of knowledge that we need now to improve our community to the next step 17:16:38 we had designers, translators, writers, marketing people 17:17:00 but we dont have a great number of people packaging and developing for fedora from here 17:17:03 RodrigoPadula: I dont think it is helpful to set a single focus for a FUDCon 17:17:20 no, it will not be a single focus 17:17:40 will cover many areas 17:17:50 we will have lectures about fedora in general 17:17:57 install fests 17:18:15 spins/remix 17:18:25 how to use and configure fedora 17:18:28 RodrigoPadula: announcing that we will focus on RPM/DEV means that people intersted in other ares wont turn up 17:19:02 but need need to work more in RPM/DEV 17:20:02 RodrigoPadula: yes. 17:20:11 we will cover many areas 17:20:15 but by example 17:20:16 but doing so by turning away others is not helpful 17:20:41 sure 17:20:54 the idea is to cover many areas with local support 17:21:28 RodrigoPadula: I think we need to make sure there is a user track and a developer track 17:21:34 RodrigoPadula: that worked well at toronto 17:21:35 but by example, we cant spend a lot of money to invite people to talk abou fedorat instalation, configuration 17:21:58 When I told keep a focus, I'm thinking on the budget applyed 17:22:24 RodrigoPadula: We need to Invite local people to help us 17:22:53 I think will be better by example, to keep the focus on support developers/packagers than designers/translators 17:23:08 because this kind of knowledge we have in all countries 17:23:21 but the RPM/DEV, only in some countries we have members 17:23:48 so, if we will pay to bring people, we need to pay for people that will add more knoledge to the local community 17:24:14 did you got it ? that's my view of focus. 17:24:56 RodrigoPadula: We need to pay for people to come based on the sponsorship process 17:25:18 yes 17:25:20 sure 17:25:33 but we need to define a priority 17:25:57 and that argument is defined by the sponsorship process 17:27:35 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Sponsoring_event_attendees 17:28:38 I think we need to use the budget to improve the local communities 17:28:55 and in latam, what we need to improve is the RPM/DEV 17:29:02 group 17:29:11 RodrigoPadula: You need to be clear in how you plan to spend it 17:29:17 sure 17:29:44 all info will be added to the week and all decisions we will beased in all rules and CommArch support 17:29:47 RodrigoPadula: Im saying you need to be open to all proposals for people requesting sponsorship 17:30:26 i feel that dictating a single focus could turn away proposals that will help in awesome unforseen ways 17:31:11 I totally agree that working on things like packaging and more technical issues can do with some help 17:31:52 the non-tech issues will be covered by the local group 17:31:59 asalles: what do you think? 17:32:58 RodrigoPadula: but we want them to sign up on the wiki and pre-register. If we state that we are focusing onone area they are more likely to say im not going to come 17:34:10 volvi 17:34:35 me parece que el enfoque del Fudcon tendría que ser técnico 17:34:54 asalles, sure 17:34:55 no enfocado a traductores o diseñadores 17:35:15 porque ya existen otros eventos en relacion a traductores y diseñadores 17:35:22 fue lo que dice a dgilmore 17:35:24 dudo que sea el foco principal de Fudcon 17:35:37 sure 17:35:44 then we have a fad not a fudcon 17:36:00 :-) 17:36:14 will be a fuDcon 17:36:22 focus on D 17:36:34 RodrigoPadula: if you cut out things and focus only on one thing its a FAD 17:36:44 no no 17:36:57 we will talk and work in all areas 17:37:13 all proposals will be added on the wiki 17:37:39 but what I'm talking about is that we need to keep the focus/budget in what we dont have here 17:38:32 we will invite users and students from all the local universities to joing us 17:38:56 and we will organize a lot of activities for people that use fedora, that dont use linus 17:38:59 linux 17:39:15 and people that dont know what a h... is fedora 17:39:36 but it will be organized by the local group from Santiago 17:39:48 +1 17:39:49 based on the knowlegde of the local skills 17:39:57 RodrigoPadula: You will want to be working directly with tatica, Neville, and some other LATAM Fedora contributors who are directly involved in other areas of Fedora too 17:40:00 and the public the will be there 17:40:01 there needs to be a USER and developer track 17:40:24 A FUDCon can have a dedicated track, and also include sessions for other people as well. 17:40:30 For example, the Berlin FUDCon 17:40:34 * that 17:40:40 had an infrastructure track as one set of sessions 17:40:47 and also had sessions on a wide variety of other topics too 17:41:32 sure 17:41:46 but we dont have money to sponsor all people that are working in Latam 17:41:57 and in latam is very large and expensive 17:42:13 so, if we will have sessions that local people can do 17:42:25 why we will pay one people from other country to come to do ? 17:42:30 RodrigoPadula: we can ask people to provide session proposals for RPM/DEV we need to evaluate all proposals based on the merit of the benfefit that fedora gets by having the session 17:42:39 with the budget that we have by example 17:42:59 we will have money to sponsor one people from 4 or 6 countries 17:43:27 RodrigoPadula: you not listening. we should use local resources for everything that we can. 17:43:37 sure 17:44:09 the question is.. all people will be added their names on the wiki requestin support 17:44:16 peoplet that are only fedora users 17:44:20 and we should bring people in who have great things to add 17:44:29 or people that are fedora ambassadors but isn't so actie 17:44:39 if we dont choose a focus to bring people 17:44:52 the FUDCon will not be productive, like the last one 17:45:02 dgilmore, that's the point 17:45:28 the great things to add now to our local team are tech things 17:45:32 RodrigoPadula: it has nothing to do with if the person is an ambasador or not 17:46:08 man, you dont know latam people :-) 17:46:22 in fact we likely want mostly people who are not ambasdors 17:46:27 many people will join us on the wiki only because: Ohhh Chile is COOL! 17:46:50 since there is a huge disconnect between ambasadors and the technical people who are in LATAM 17:47:03 RodrigoPadula: and we dont pay for them 17:47:22 RodrigoPadula: we are not obliged to pay for everyone who asks for money 17:47:29 Yes 17:47:37 sure 17:47:42 RodrigoPadula: people we pay for we will expect deliverables from 17:48:28 which will be covered in there proposal 17:48:37 I think the problem here is my english, I'm very direct to the point and dont have works to explain myself clearly 17:49:08 RodrigoPadula: you asking people who you think will give great talks/help in a great way with RPM/DEV to submit a proposal it a good things to do 17:49:35 We will accept all proposals 17:49:44 lets move on 17:49:45 will read and study all possibilities 17:49:58 but we have to think in the legacy 17:50:02 to the local community 17:50:06 to the university 17:50:15 and to Fedora as a Linux Distribution 17:50:27 that's the Latam POV 17:51:16 the focus on RPM/DEV isn't a decision mine 17:51:29 it's a request from the local group that are interested to help fedora 17:52:02 to add something more than translations and free media distribution 17:52:40 did you got it ? 17:53:32 RodrigoPadula: great that local group can provide Ideas/talks/sessions and people to help with them 17:53:43 RodrigoPadula: I think we have been derailed here 17:53:58 Lets move on to the next steps and review this later 17:54:19 :-) 17:54:42 asalles: when do you think you can confirm dates with the university? 17:55:10 asalles,will talk with the university tomorrow 17:56:22 RodrigoPadula: yes but they likely wont give us an answer then 17:57:22 I think tomorrow he will send to us a reply about this issue 18:00:57 I will schedule a meeting with the ambassadors from Chile for the next week ASAP 18:03:50 #action asalles talk with Universidad Central to define the FUDCon date 18:06:51 RodrigoPadula: do you have questions about the bid process? 18:16:39 RodrigoPadula: Yep, the information about the other locations should go on the bid process page as well. 18:16:43 In the bid process format. 18:17:04 So it's great that the Ambassadors put some information on the wiki already, it makes that a lot easier. :) 18:21:51 so, I have to add city one and city 2 18:22:37 RodrigoPadula: I think the people proposing the cities should 18:24:11 the hope is that you don't have to do anything regarding proposing cities, RodrigoPadula, unless you are proposing a city yourself. 18:24:47 ok, because the people from argentina didn't provided us some information 18:25:30 will be strange to resquest information from argentina now 18:25:33 RodrigoPadula: please ask them for some 18:25:40 because Chile will held the event 18:26:03 RodrigoPadula: point the Argentinians to the bid process page, if they fail to provide a bid, they can't be considered - but it makes the process transparent. 18:27:20 I think will not be important now to add information about Argentina 18:30:56 probably here https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon_and_FAD_locations will be the best place to add information abou argentina 18:31:56 And you can remind the folks in Argentina, or anywhere, that getting a bid together is a one-time effort, and then it can be used for any future FUDCon or FAD. 18:34:03 humrum 19:12:39 * mchua curious - how was it decided that it was going to be in Chile? 19:20:37 mchua, I sent emails to the commArch list about it 19:21:01 based on the info added in our wiki by the ambassadors from Chile 19:21:19 and the support that Universidad Central will give to us to realize the event 19:25:56 RodrigoPadula: Makes sense - thanks. Just wondering if we should document that somewhere in the process page so that people don't ask "wait, why doesn't this follow the process?" when they look at it later on. (Particularly the locations that did not get chosen this time.) 19:26:15 sure 19:26:35 I had a meeting with the local ambassadors about it 19:27:13 and all logs was added in the blog post 19:27:22 #link http://www.projetofedora.org/fudcon_latam_2010_chile 19:27:59 mchua, I think we need to spread this link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon_and_FAD_locations 19:28:19 it will be very important to the nexts FUDCons/FADs 19:33:20 RodrigoPadula: I just asked the folks that were working on the bid process page, and they think that the [[FUDCon and FAD locations]] page should be deprecated. 19:33:28 jds2001: can you chime in on this a bit? 19:34:12 I think that that page is deprecated now. 19:34:25 would be interesting to create a new page 19:34:29 because we want a more formal bid process and there needs to be some format around it 19:34:39 based on the documentation generated on this FAD 19:34:47 and that page looks to be simply added to, and never removed from :) 19:34:52 it can save a lot of time in the future :-) 19:35:23 i think there's some valuable ideas there 19:35:24 jds2001: so it should be an archive page 19:35:31 dgilmore: yep 19:36:15 like how do I know that some is still actively looking to hold a FUDCon in Athens and has the wherewithal to do that now? 19:36:51 RodrigoPadula, jds2001: I'm thinking that it might make more sense for each event to have its own bid process page. That's what we have for FUDCon LATAM right now 19:36:54 * mchua finds link 19:37:01 right. 19:37:55 and there's *no* detail in the LATAM section of that page 19:38:04 other than "hey, it would be cool in Santiago" 19:38:30 RodrigoPadula: jds2001: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Santiago_2010_planning/Bid_process 19:39:06 jds2001, that page isnt used 19:39:28 But it's what's supposed to happen, according to our 'how to plan a FUDCon' doc. 19:39:29 I'm just thinking that woulkd be interesting to use it 19:39:51 I think it's more interesting/useful to have the bid process page for FUDCon LATAM 2010 just be for FUDCon LATAM 2010. 19:40:01 That way, locations know what event they're bidding for. 19:40:22 And later on, for future events, it's pretty trivial for them to copy-paste their bid for this event into the bid for the other event (while changing a few dates, etc. they'll have to change anyway). 19:40:25 and some of the content could be reused by future bids for that location that didnt succeed. 19:40:35 ...what jds2001 just said. 19:40:41 I think could be better to have one general page 19:41:22 why? 19:41:26 so, if we want to organize one eventi in Central America, or Asia que dont need to create a bid or competition page where the best will win 19:41:43 why wouldnt you? 19:41:55 RodrigoPadula: If you think it would be better to have one general place to put location bids, the place to suggest that patch is in the overall FUDCon planning process. 19:42:23 Because the process that we have for FUDCon planning says that bids should be done by event. 19:42:27 the whole point of the process is so that the best location wins. Criteria for Asia are going to be very different than those for LATAM I'd guess. 19:42:52 And the process exists so that we have a way to help you with your FUDCon planning - the closer you're sticking to the process we have, the more we'll be able to help you. 19:43:24 yes, but the COmmArch, famsco and fedora marketing can have a general overview of all countries where we have ambassadors 19:43:34 and members interested to held one event 19:43:54 it can be usefull for marketing strategies 19:44:49 I fail to see how where the bid process is stored has anything to do with marketing. 19:45:20 I think there *does* need to be a bid process, just to make that clear. 19:45:42 sure 19:45:44 because there's many people that are interested in holding events. 19:45:47 we need a bid process 19:46:19 but I think would be interesting to have a wiki page with a lot of cities/countries interested to held events 19:46:25 RodrigoPadula: We do need a bid process. 19:46:30 RodrigoPadula: Right now, the way we do bid processes is by event. 19:46:48 RodrigoPadula: Perhaps that's the best way to do it, perhaps not - but in either case, right now, we do bid processes by event. 19:46:55 mchua: what about putting them in a category 19:47:14 RodrigoPadula: Think about it this way - if you were making a package, and thought the packaging guidelines could be improved, what would you do? 19:47:23 I'm not talking that we dont need, am I ? 19:47:49 RodrigoPadula: You would make your package according to the packaging guidelines as currently written, and *then,* separately, go to FESCo and say "hey, I think these packaging guidelines could be changed." 19:47:50 RodrigoPadula: perhaps I was just confused. 19:48:05 RodrigoPadula: I think we all agree that a bid process is needed. 19:48:07 well, FPC, but whatever :D 19:48:12 mchua, +1 19:48:14 jds2001: ...ok, FPC, right. 19:48:29 now, by example 19:48:43 we have the spec to organize onde event FAD/FUDCon 19:48:56 RodrigoPadula: I think that where we disagree is "should these bids be listed per-event - all the bids for one event on that event's bid page - or should these bids be all in one giant 'bids for Fedora events' page"? 19:49:13 RodrigoPadula, jds2001: Does that seem like an accurate summary of the two positions here? 19:49:22 seems to. 19:49:27 and we have a bid repository of cities/countries interested to held one event 19:49:48 but the logisitcs of holdoing various events are VERY different 19:49:48 so, we decide that we need to improve the community in Central america 19:50:00 a FUDCon takes much more than a FAD, for example. 19:50:03 so, yum search Central America 19:50:07 -> Panama 19:50:11 -> Nicaragua 19:50:18 -> El Salvador 19:50:26 hummm... interesting this package Nicaragua 19:50:33 so... yum install Nicaragua 19:50:34 :_) 19:50:55 jds2001, yes, but the SPEC/process is the same for both 19:51:14 * mchua chuckles at the extension of this analogy 19:51:59 So, I think what's happening is that jds2001 is describing reasons why the current policy (on how bid processes work) is the way it is 19:52:22 and RodrigoPadula is describing reasons why a different bid process (all-events-in-one-page) might be more advantageous. 19:52:32 Which is a great discussion to have, *at some point.* 19:52:50 But right now, we're trying to get the bid process for FUDCon LATAM 2010 wrapped up. 19:53:14 (in other words, "rpmbuild fudcon-latam-2010-bids.spec") 19:54:12 and the current "packaging guidelines" for how FUDCon bid processes should work is that we need to have a page like https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Santiago_2010_planning/Bid_process, and have that filled in. 19:54:12 I think the step after 'yum search' is 'yum info', not 'yum install' 19:54:34 ...aaaaanyway. 19:55:25 Meaning, after finding out the possibilities, you get detailed info about the one you're considering, before you commit yourself to a decision. 19:55:49 So RodrigoPadula - I know you might not entirely agree with the bid process as it stands right now, but we do have to work through that process in order to move forward with planning for your FUDCon. 19:55:56 (I'll copypaste backlog when he gets back.) 19:56:15 Oh! Welcome back. :) 19:56:18 how much of that did you get? 19:56:20 * mchua will just paste what I just said 19:56:33 sorry, I had a problem with my internet 19:56:46 Hang on, pastebinning backlog for you... 19:56:59 thanks mel! 19:57:04 RodrigoPadula: http://fpaste.org/RT5q/ 19:57:27 * ctyler heads for airport 19:58:24 * ke4qqq gets ready to leave 19:59:22 I agree with the current bid process 19:59:56 the page that I'm talking about isn't so complete like described in the bid process 20:00:41 RodrigoPadula: Is https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Santiago_2010_planning/Bid_process the page you're talking about? 20:00:54 (that's the page I'm looking at.) 20:00:56 the idea is only to have a place where people interested in held a FUDCon or a FAD can add countries and cities with some informations 20:01:11 RodrigoPadula: Ah, that's separate from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Santiago_2010_planning/Bid_process. 20:01:48 RodrigoPadula: Even if people put their cities on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon_and_FAD_locations, they still need to put it on the individual event page to be considered. 20:02:19 I'm talking about this page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon_and_FAD_locations 20:03:07 RodrigoPadula: Oh, ok. I think I see where the differences in our perspectives might be coming from. 20:03:32 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon_and_FAD_locations is a page that isn't used *at all* in the current FUDCon bid process. 20:03:52 the idea of this page is "Oh, realize on FAD or one FUDCon in my city is a interesting idea" 20:04:32 based on this page we can start a bid process 20:04:48 RodrigoPadula: And it's fine to put things there (though I think some people might argue that the page rapidly gets out of date and isn't maintained, but that's a different discussion as well.) 20:04:58 requesting more info, inviting more people and countries to held 20:05:32 RodrigoPadula: Yes. And when that bid process for a specific event happens, each location that wants to bid for that particular event needs to post (or re-post) their information on the bid page for *that particular event.* 20:05:37 my 0,02 20:05:41 In this case, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Santiago_2010_planning/Bid_process. 20:05:49 the current bid process is very good 20:05:52 I agree 100% 20:06:51 the _locations page can be an idea to help, or to see who is interested to held 20:06:54 nothing more... 20:09:04 RodrigoPadula: Ok - I think we're on the same page, then. 20:09:08 Just making sure we are. :) 20:11:45 * RodrigoPadula thinks that my english isn't good enough to explain ideas :-) 20:12:02 RodrigoPadula: We need to get ready to leave to head home. Lets pick this up again this week after we have some more info from asalles. 20:12:13 RodrigoPadula: you are doing ok :) 20:12:54 RodrigoPadula: I think we're off to a great start. 20:13:41 RodrigoPadula: You've helped us find and clarify some things in the process and the resources we've made during our FAD, and that's been a big help in making our work better. 20:13:48 And making this process easier for future FUDCon planners. 20:14:12 this documentation will help us a lot 20:14:18 RodrigoPadula: And FUDCon LATAM planning is still in the very beginning stages (as it should be), but it's going through those stages The Right Way. 20:14:59 RodrigoPadula: And I think that as long as you keep on announcing things to the fudcon-planning list, and having regular planning meetings in this channel and logging them (and sending those logs to the fudcon-planning list) we'll be able to help you with the rest of the process as things go on. 20:15:22 RodrigoPadula: That's what we hoped, that the documentation would help :) you folks are our beta testers, more or less. 20:16:02 * mchua has to go and rap up the FAD - *really* appreciate you spending your weekend with us, RodrigoPadula. I know you're incredibly busy. 20:16:16 er, that's "wrap up the FAD" 20:16:45 RodrigoPadula, dgilmore: can you #endmeeting and post logs (and a 3-sentence summary, since these logs are so long) to the fudcon-planning list when you're done? 20:16:49 #chair dgilmore RodrigoPadula 20:16:49 Current chairs: RodrigoPadula dgilmore mchua spevack 20:17:18 * mchua out for the day - thanks all! 20:17:49 I think you can finish the meeting 20:18:12 I'm going now too 20:18:21 #endmeeting