======================================== #fedora-meeting: Flock next-gen software ======================================== Meeting started by stickster at 19:00:52 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-10-22/flocksoftware.2015-10-22-19.00.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll call (stickster, 19:00:58) * Summary (stickster, 19:03:42) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Flock_2016_software#Tool_Comparisons (stickster, 19:04:09) * In usual awesome fashion mizmo filled out the comparison table for regcfp (stickster, 19:04:21) * puiterwijk is adding functionality for travel reimbursement requests, will show paper acceptance and be reflected in running budget (stickster, 19:19:35) * voting in regcfp is optional, uses simplified method of LCA/GUADEC (-2 to +2) -- could use Fedora voting app if desired with no cost/repercussion (stickster, 19:22:52) * mail support in regcfp is coded, just needs merge (stickster, 19:35:04) * regcfp RFEs (stickster, 19:48:42) * tagging/categorization of talks (stickster, 19:48:56) * ability to dump CSVs of email addresses for subscriptions (stickster, 19:49:38) * custom fields of various types, with configurable visibility, and ability to add post-registration if needed (stickster, 19:50:18) * NTH: co-speakers (stickster, 19:50:31) * ACTION: stickster start on issue filing for regcfp (stickster, 19:58:06) * ACTION: mizmo check in with stickster & issue queue next week to see what, if anything, remains to be done (stickster, 19:58:20) * ACTION: stickster send notice to list that we are down to just zookeepr vs. regcfp and based on the speed at which puiterwijk is looking at issues we might want to wait a few weeks to do a final comparison (stickster, 19:58:48) Meeting ended at 20:01:06 UTC. Action Items ------------ * stickster start on issue filing for regcfp * mizmo check in with stickster & issue queue next week to see what, if anything, remains to be done * stickster send notice to list that we are down to just zookeepr vs. regcfp and based on the speed at which puiterwijk is looking at issues we might want to wait a few weeks to do a final comparison Action Items, by person ----------------------- * mizmo * mizmo check in with stickster & issue queue next week to see what, if anything, remains to be done * puiterwijk * stickster send notice to list that we are down to just zookeepr vs. regcfp and based on the speed at which puiterwijk is looking at issues we might want to wait a few weeks to do a final comparison * stickster * stickster start on issue filing for regcfp * mizmo check in with stickster & issue queue next week to see what, if anything, remains to be done * stickster send notice to list that we are down to just zookeepr vs. regcfp and based on the speed at which puiterwijk is looking at issues we might want to wait a few weeks to do a final comparison * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * stickster (89) * mizmo (45) * puiterwijk (41) * zodbot (10) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot