In usual awesome fashion mizmo filled out the
comparison table for regcfp(stickster,
19:04:21)
puiterwijk is adding functionality for travel
reimbursement requests, will show paper acceptance and be reflected
in running budget(stickster,
19:19:35)
voting in regcfp is optional, uses simplified
method of LCA/GUADEC (-2 to +2) -- could use Fedora voting app if
desired with no cost/repercussion(stickster,
19:22:52)
mail support in regcfp is coded, just needs
merge(stickster,
19:35:04)
ACTION: stickster
start on issue filing for regcfp(stickster,
19:58:06)
ACTION: mizmo check
in with stickster & issue queue next week to see what, if
anything, remains to be done(stickster,
19:58:20)
ACTION: stickster
send notice to list that we are down to just zookeepr vs. regcfp and
based on the speed at which puiterwijk is looking at issues we might
want to wait a few weeks to do a final comparison(stickster,
19:58:48)
mizmo check in with stickster & issue queue next week to see what, if anything, remains to be done
stickster send notice to list that we are down to just zookeepr vs. regcfp and based on the speed at which puiterwijk is looking at issues we might want to wait a few weeks to do a final comparison
Action items, by person
mizmo
mizmo check in with stickster & issue queue next week to see what, if anything, remains to be done
puiterwijk
stickster send notice to list that we are down to just zookeepr vs. regcfp and based on the speed at which puiterwijk is looking at issues we might want to wait a few weeks to do a final comparison
stickster
stickster start on issue filing for regcfp
mizmo check in with stickster & issue queue next week to see what, if anything, remains to be done
stickster send notice to list that we are down to just zookeepr vs. regcfp and based on the speed at which puiterwijk is looking at issues we might want to wait a few weeks to do a final comparison