there appear to be no action items from last
time(adamw,
15:06:38)
there's nothing requiring follow-up from
2015-06-01 meeting(adamw,
15:08:10)
Fedora 23 schedule / status / planning(adamw, 15:08:17)
the current F23 schedule is available at
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-23/f-23-quality-tasks.html(adamw,
15:08:35)
we have some thoughts on overhauling the
release validation process to be more nightly-based and CI-ish and
removing or downplaying the significance of Alpha and Beta releases,
but these are probably F24 or later stuff with the shortish F23
cycle(adamw,
15:21:44)
releng is working on having full TC/RC-style
nightly composes during F23 cycle (not just lives and
boot.iso)(adamw,
15:22:02)
we'll do the first blocker review meeting on
06-22 to get out in front of the proposed blockers(adamw,
15:26:09)
roshi notes that there is a current discussion
around shipping post-release respins for some images:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1444 . This obviously has
significant QA implications(adamw,
15:32:00)
existing live respins -
http://tinyurl.com/Live-respins - are semi- (or quarter-?) official
and have no official QA process(adamw,
15:35:42)
we have a consensus that respins shouldn't be
released without some kind of testing commitment in place, and the
WGs responsible for the media to be respun need to help provide the
resources to do the testing and demonstrate that it's actually
occurred(adamw,
15:46:55)
AGREED: F22 process
tweaks like more nightly validation, earlier blocker review and
openQA all worked pretty well, we'll continue with them for
F23(adamw,
16:06:16)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217844 was
a victim of a secretarialization mistake during blocker review,
let's remember to double-check our work for F23 :)(adamw,
16:06:56)