"adamw to send a mail to test@ about the ten
year t-shirt thing" - clearly, that happened:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2014-January/120006.html(adamw,
16:09:36)
there has been a bit of a debate about the EOL
(end-of-life) process, which is documented on the Wiki in a QA-ish
space (Bugzappers), but which in practice has been handled by the
program manager(adamw,
16:13:36)
thread started at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-December/193094.html(adamw,
16:15:58)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/End_of_life_SOP
still shows the bug closure to be the responsibility of
'Bugzappers'(adamw,
16:36:55)
http://johnpoelstra.com/five-months-of-bug-triage/
implies the history of the EOL process - it was developed as part of
the Bugzappers effort and originally done by poelcat with his
Bugzappers hat on, not his Program Manager hat(adamw,
16:37:34)
EOL scripts are available at
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-project-schedule.git/tree/scripts/closebugs(adamw,
16:40:06)
viking-ice's suggestions that QA should own the
process and perhaps drop the closing of bugs on EOL releases is
noted but not supported by a consensus(adamw,
16:50:38)
ACTION: adamw to
summarize the discussion for a fesco ticket note on
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1198(adamw,
16:58:41)