06:09:57 <tagoh_> #startmeeting i18n 06:09:57 <zodbot> Meeting started Thu Oct 18 06:09:57 2012 UTC. The chair is tagoh_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 06:09:57 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 06:09:58 <tagoh_> #meetingname i18n 06:09:58 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'i18n' 06:09:59 <tagoh_> #topic agenda and roll call 06:09:59 <tagoh_> #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Meetings/2012-10-18 06:10:13 <paragan> hi 06:10:16 <mfabian> hi 06:10:18 <tagoh_> okay, sorry for late start. let's have a meeting 06:10:36 <pravins> hi 06:11:26 <epico> hi 06:11:35 <juhp> hi 06:11:37 <dueno> hi 06:12:17 <tagoh_> okay, let's get started. 06:12:29 <tagoh_> #topic Upcoming schedule 06:12:30 <tagoh_> #info 2012-10-23 Beta Change Deadline 06:12:30 <tagoh_> #info 2012-10-23 Features 100% Complete 06:12:30 <tagoh_> #info 2012-11-06 Beta Release 06:12:31 <tagoh_> #info 2012-11-26 Final Change Deadline 06:12:40 <tagoh_> as you know beta slipped by one week. 06:13:28 <tagoh_> good to keep testing to improve beta much more. 06:14:11 <tagoh_> okay, move on. 06:14:14 <tagoh_> #topic New topics 06:14:15 <fujiwarat> hi 06:14:15 <tagoh_> #info #8: Hinting related issues for Liberation_Fonts_2 on Fedora 18 (pravins) 06:14:16 <tagoh_> #link https://fedorahosted.org/i18n/ticket/8 06:15:53 <tagoh_> pravins: so, can you say more about this topic, please 06:16:25 <pravins> tagoh_: yes sure 06:16:51 <anish_> hi 06:17:01 <pravins> As you know we are providing Liberation Fonts 2.0 in Fedora 18. It is based on Google Croscore fonts 06:17:26 <pravins> Has more character coverage compared Liberation 1.07.2 06:17:30 <pravins> better hinting 06:17:57 <pravins> this discussion is specifically w.r.t. 06:17:58 <pravins> .bug 856239 06:18:01 <zodbot> pravins: Bug 856239 fuzzy font rendering (Liberation 2 regression) - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856239 06:19:38 <pravins> rendering text provided in this url http://kasmail.kasserver.com/ here Liberation 1.07.2 looks more sharp compared to Liberation 2.00.1 (anti-aliased) 06:20:11 <pravins> i simple created .html of same context of web url, screeshot is here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=623366 06:20:32 <pravins> i can clearly see here, Liberation 2.00.0 provides better rendering 06:21:26 <pravins> i want comments from you all on same 06:21:41 <paragan> ok 06:21:54 <pravins> s/want/looking for 06:22:01 <juhp> pravins, which one is 2.00 ? 06:22:34 <pravins> juhp: right hand side 06:22:54 <juhp> I see 06:23:32 <mfabian> The left side doesn’t look like the sharp byte code hinting either though. 06:24:16 <tagoh_> guess he don't just like blurred rendering right? 06:24:25 <mfabian> In the picture on the left side, the 'i' in the word English is very blurred. 06:25:07 <pravins> tagoh_: yes 06:25:37 <pravins> mfabian: yes, if we closed watch even E-mail "E", horizontal bars are not equal width as Vertical. 06:26:13 <tagoh_> yeah, that would be obvious one 06:26:49 <juhp> true but conversely the umlaut over the U is pretty unclear on the right 06:26:57 <juhp> "u 06:27:02 <mfabian> For other letters it is the other way round, so some letters look more blurred on the left, some look more blurred on the right, I can see no really obvious difference between these two screenshots. The left side is slightly less blurred overall, but only very slighly. 06:27:19 <juhp> ok 06:27:20 <mfabian> Yes, the 'u' in Deutsch seems better to me on the left. 06:27:45 <pravins> mfabian: juhp: yes, dots looked bit merged due to anti-aliased may be on right side 06:27:56 <juhp> right 06:27:59 <mfabian> The 'h' in 'Ohne' is better on the left. 06:28:38 <pravins> reporter has provided 2 comparison screenshot on Fedora 17 and Fedora 18 06:28:53 <pravins> those are https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=611793 F17, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=611794 F18 06:29:13 <juhp> the distance from screen and size may also be a factor 06:29:45 <mfabian> I zoomed in using 'xmag' to look at the individual pixels. 06:30:05 <juhp> so a (cascade) comparison for different sizes might also be helpful 06:30:32 <tagoh_> true 06:30:39 <pravins> i have done some comparison with Libre Office as well 06:30:41 <pravins> http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/liberation/text-liberation-fonts-2-00-1.png 06:30:47 <pravins> http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/liberation/text-liberation-1-07-2.png 06:31:08 <mfabian> The reporters screenshots show a much more obvious difference between f17 and f18. 06:31:48 <pravins> mfabian: yeah, but dunno what CSS websites using. local HTML result are little bit different 06:32:04 <pravins> Liberation 2.0 looks good with local html 06:32:24 <mfabian> On the reporters screenshots, I would say the f17 version is clearly better because it shows really sharp byte code rendering which I prefer very much. Sometimes it is hard for me to understand how anybody could prefer more fuzzy rendering, but some people really do, so it seems to be a matter of taste. 06:32:26 <juhp> the Liberation shots are more different 06:33:18 <juhp> pravins, are the Liberation shots both from f18 or ? 06:33:38 <pravins> juhp: yes, i just used different Liberation fonts version 06:33:44 <juhp> ok 06:33:54 <paragan> we should check some system application UI in f18 for such testing 06:35:16 <tagoh_> though some characters' metrics looks broken with 1.07.2 on that shot 06:35:29 <mfabian> For easy testing how a font looks with different hinting options, I usually do 'ftview 12 /usr/share/fonts/liberation/LiberationSans-Regular.ttf' and then use the 'f' and 'h' keys to toggle the hinting options. That makes it easier to see what happens exactly for me, with a website some other side effects may cause confusion. 06:35:59 <tagoh_> mfabian: right. 06:36:04 <juhp> aha 06:36:14 <pravins> agree 06:36:33 <juhp> I never really understand the rendering of office apps though 06:36:49 <pravins> with Liberation 2.0, we also get rid of some long pending hinting issues of liberation 1.07.2 06:36:55 <pravins> .bug 591556 06:36:58 <zodbot> pravins: Bug 591556 Blur on Russian «б» and number '8' has some wart on its face. - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591556 06:37:02 <mfabian> I don't know the current state, but a few years ago I had a long discussion with Michael Meeks about rendering in openoffice. 06:37:05 <pravins> .bug 715309 06:37:08 <zodbot> pravins: Bug 715309 [hinting] Bold 'u' looks skinny - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715309 06:37:16 <pravins> .bug 768067 06:37:19 <zodbot> pravins: Bug 768067 [hinting] Lowercase U, V, W, X and Y too thin at 18px bold - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768067 06:37:37 <pravins> .bug 591554 06:37:39 <zodbot> pravins: Bug 591554 Font artifact with number 4 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591554 06:38:02 <juhp> mfabian, did you talk about whitespace between characters? 06:38:26 <mfabian> At that time, they disabled the hinting because with hinting on they had problems with the spacing between the glyphs changing slightly causing slightly uneven line lengths. 06:38:45 <juhp> hmm 06:40:06 <mfabian> Werner Lemberg from freetype said, this shouldn’t happen and the openoffice people are doing something wrong, but I don’t know whether they ever fixed it. But because of this, rendering in openoffice used to look different then in other applications and ignored the system settings. 06:41:15 <tagoh_> so disabled hinting for all of fonts no matter what the quality of the hinting is? 06:42:36 <mfabian> juhp: yes, the white space between glyphs may change slightly with hinting because the stems need to be aligned to pixels to make them really sharp. 06:43:19 <juhp> right I see - but I find that really annoying - these large arbitrary spaces in words 06:44:43 * pravins will update comparison screenshot of ftview on bugzilla 06:44:54 <pravins> s/of/with 06:46:05 <mfabian> juhp: it really seems to be a matter of taste, I very much prefer the sharpness, even if this causes some side effects like uneven spacing withing words or a letter 'm' not having the same distance between the 3 stems. 06:46:46 <juhp> ok - well I don't like it much but I am not crossing to the other side for it ;o) 06:46:52 <juhp> :) 06:47:00 <tagoh_> pravins: so given that it's still far from what he expects, is there any way we can still do? 06:47:26 <pravins> tagoh_: i have disable anti-aliasing in Liberation 2.00.1 version but still it renders same 06:47:38 <pravins> i think ft-view will give some better results 06:47:47 <tagoh_> sure, I think so 06:47:57 <juhp> anti-aliasing has no effect? 06:48:19 <juhp> (or disabling it at least) 06:48:26 <pravins> as mfabian said might be application are creating some noise there 06:49:25 <pravins> 2. I personally feel readability is improved in Liberation 2.0 06:49:37 <pravins> since its more thick compared to old version 06:49:45 <pravins> we have more character coverage 06:50:25 <mfabian> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856239#c28 <- Behdad writes that he prefers the blurred version, it is hard for me to understand but some people really prefer that. 06:50:37 <juhp> certainly feels like it is heavier 06:50:38 <pravins> But as it is personnel preference for Sharp or blur version 06:50:53 <mfabian> and in comment#37 he writes: “Would help if you just learn to accept that these things are subjective. If you cannot see how it is clearer, fine. Some of us see it that way.” 06:50:57 <tagoh_> pravins: dunno how you tried that, if there are no hinting in the font, freetype enables auto-hinting automatically in fedora afaik. fyi 06:51:04 <mfabian> I think Behdad is right there, this is subjective. 06:51:15 <juhp> sure 06:51:53 <pravins> yes 06:52:04 <pravins> so what we should do considering the request 06:52:25 <pravins> backward compatibility for rendering looks bit difficult to me 06:52:53 <mfabian> I remember endless bug reports when I worked for SuSE very similar to this bug 856239, no matter what you do, some people will be unhappy and complain loudly. 06:54:03 <juhp> right 06:55:34 <juhp> pravins, is it possible to generate some more comparison shots? maybe try to avoid browser or office 06:55:40 <fujiwarat> How about MS-Windows and Mac OS about the hinting? I thought the problem was anti-alias. 06:56:49 <pravins> juhp: yes 06:57:09 <epico> fujiwarat, maybe they used sub-pixel hinting. 06:57:10 <tagoh_> let's see how it looks like on ftview. 06:57:17 <fujiwarat> ok 06:59:30 <tagoh_> #action pravins to take another screenshots with ftview 06:59:45 <tagoh_> okay, anything else better trying? 07:00:16 <pravins> http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/liberation1.7-fedora17.png 07:00:21 <pravins> http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/liberation2-0-fedora18.png 07:00:36 <pravins> just took these screenshots 07:02:13 <tagoh_> pravins: maybe better press 6 to show with waterfall. it gives you more comparison on different size 07:02:24 <mfabian> To me the f17 screenshot looks slighly better, less fuzzy. 07:03:28 <pravins> do you think, should we provide backward compatibility as well? i..e packaging Liberation 1.07 with different name. may be liberation-old-fonts? 07:05:50 <tagoh_> hm, IMHO it's up to you. 07:06:41 <mfabian> Would enough people care so strongly about that, that it is worth the effort to keep the old liberation fonts? I think I would try to avoid that and keep only the new fonts. The better glyph coverage is probably more important than these differences in hinting. And keeping them both might cause more work for you. 07:07:16 <pravins> exactly, will be problem to maintain both version 07:07:47 <pravins> .bug 473842 07:07:49 <zodbot> pravins: Bug 473842 RFE: Add Greek Polytonic support to Liberation fonts - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473842 07:08:02 <pravins> with liberation 2..0, we got this RFE resolve as well 07:08:30 <pravins> thanks all for your opinions, really very very useful 07:09:44 <tagoh_> okay, let's see how it's going on bz then. 07:09:54 <tagoh_> pravins: thanks for bringing this up here. 07:10:00 <tagoh_> let's move on then. 07:10:08 <tagoh_> #topic Open Floor 07:10:35 <tagoh_> so anything else topics to discuss here prior to close the meeting? 07:10:43 <anish_> i-t-b now supports 73 locales :) 07:10:56 <anish_> thanks mfabian 07:11:02 <tagoh_> aha. cool :) 07:11:44 <anish_> mfabian, added support native keyboards 07:12:55 <mfabian> I could not figure out how to do Korean yet, maybe it is not needed because ibus-hangul probably supports suggestions already. But trying to get Korean working might give me some insights in how to handle combining characters. 07:13:30 <mfabian> anish_: maybe I should update the f18 package soon before it is too late for the deadline for f18? 07:14:28 <tagoh_> mfabian: not too late yet I think as long as there are volunteers for testing and give a karma 07:14:56 <tagoh_> for beta I meant. 07:15:47 <tagoh_> in current schedule, next Tuesday is it. 07:16:23 <tagoh_> anything else? 07:18:03 <tagoh_> okay, if not, let's stop here then. 07:18:12 <tagoh_> thanks everyone for the meeting! 07:18:16 <tagoh_> #endmeeting