#fedora-meeting: Fedora QA meeting

Meeting summary

1. roll call (adamw, 15:00:14)
   
2. previous meeting follow-up (adamw, 15:03:39)
   1. "adamw to bug j_dulaney to bug Sugar test day folks" - I did that, the page got lots of nice test cases, and much fun was had by all. (adamw, 15:04:14)
   
   
3. Fedora 17 Beta status / blocker review (adamw, 15:05:25)
   1. Beta RC1 was built Friday afternoon and now needs testing (adamw, 15:06:06)
   
   
4. Beta blocker review - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804514 (adamw, 15:22:09)
   1. AGREED: #804514 is a blocker per the criterion about a 'basic video' install option being present and the one about installs that are done according to the other criteria booting to a functional desktop (adamw, 15:28:34)
   
   
5. Beta blocker review - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806749 (adamw, 15:29:04)
   1. AGREED: 806749 is accepted as a blocker per alpha criterion "The installer must be able to use the HTTP, FTP and NFS remote package source options". note kparal reports not seeing this bug, so we should compare notes (adamw, 15:35:47)
   
   
6. Beta blocker review - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806708 (adamw, 15:36:18)
   1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804813 was the previous bug (adamw, 15:37:34)
   2. AGREED: #806708 is a blocker per alpha criterion "The installer must be able to use the HTTP, FTP and NFS remote package source options", needs more info (adamw, 15:41:22)
   
   
7. Beta blocker review - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806931 (adamw, 15:42:03)
   1. AGREED: we need to know if 806931 affects non virt-install cases to determine blocker status - punt until next meeting (adamw, 15:50:32)
   
   
8. Beta blocker review - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805166 (adamw, 15:50:50)
   1. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Options#method (wwoods, 16:12:26)
   2. ACTION: kparal to propose revised criteria to cover split installs (installer sourced from one repo, packages from internet repos) (adamw, 16:18:12)
   3. ACTION: wwoods to ensure anaconda docs are updated to reflect what repo= is supposed to be capable of (adamw, 16:18:17)
   4. AGREED: 805166 is not a blocker per anaconda team's statement that using root= in this way is not supported or expected to work (adamw, 16:18:22)
   5. http://www.math.vt.edu/people/jbwillia/computer.gif (j_dulaney, 16:18:47)
   
   
9. Beta blocker review - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806962 (adamw, 16:19:32)
   1. AGREED: 806962 is a blocker per criterion "The installer must boot (if appropriate) and run on all primary architectures, with all system firmware types that are common on those architectures, from default live image, DVD, and boot.iso install media", in the case of DVD or boot.iso written to USB with l-i-t-d (adamw, 16:29:31)
   
   
10. Beta blocker review - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806867 (adamw, 16:31:01)
    1. AGREED: 806931 is a blocker per beta criterion "The installer must be able to successfully complete an upgrade installation from a clean, fully updated default installation (from any official install medium) of the previous stable Fedora release, either via preupgrade or by booting to the installer manually. The upgraded system must meet all release criteria" (adamw, 16:35:20)
    
    
11. Beta blocker review - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806931 (redux) (adamw, 16:35:35)
    1. AGREED: 806931 is accepted as a blocker per beta criterion "The installer must be able to use all kickstart delivery methods" (adamw, 16:37:44)
    
    
12. Beta blocker review - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806784 (adamw, 16:37:56)
    1. AGREED: 806784 is a blocker per criterion "The installer must be able to create and install to software, hardware or BIOS RAID-0, RAID-1 or RAID-5 partitions for anything except /boot" (adamw, 16:43:23)
    
    
13. Beta blocker review - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806466 (adamw, 16:43:40)
    1. AGREED: 806466 is rejected as blocker but accepted as NTH (not serious enough to break any criteria) (adamw, 16:47:03)
    2. AGREED: 806664 is accepted as NTH while we're at it (both make ootb network behaviour somewhat icky) (adamw, 16:47:54)
    
    
14. Beta blocker review - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804522 (adamw, 16:48:12)
    1. AGREED: 804522 is a blocker per beta criterion "The installer must be able to create and install to software, hardware or BIOS RAID-0, RAID-1 or RAID-5 partitions for anything except /boot" (adamw, 16:49:25)
    2. AGREED: agenda item "'Project' status" is tabled until next week due to lack of time and rapidly decreasing will to live (adamw, 16:50:49)
    
    
15. Test Day report (adamw, 16:51:02)
    1. Sugar test day had low turnout - only satellit_ and cerlyn - but they achieved an impressive amount of testing (adamw, 16:52:20)
    2. j_dulaney also tested but has not yet filed results (adamw, 16:52:27)
    
    
16. upcoming QA events (adamw, 16:53:06)
    1. kdump and software rendering test days set for tuesday and thursday, both need some more prep but look to be broadly in hand (adamw, 16:55:19)
    2. go/no-go is wednesday (schedule) and release readiness is thursday (adamw, 16:55:29)
    
    
17. autoqa update (adamw, 16:55:48)
    1. the AutoQA news is, there is no news (for time reasons) (adamw, 16:57:01)
    
    
18. open floor (adamw, 16:57:13)

Action items

1. kparal to propose revised criteria to cover split installs (installer sourced from one repo, packages from internet repos)
2. wwoods to ensure anaconda docs are updated to reflect what repo= is supposed to be capable of

Action items, by person

1. kparal
   1. kparal to propose revised criteria to cover split installs (installer sourced from one repo, packages from internet repos)
2. wwoods
   1. wwoods to ensure anaconda docs are updated to reflect what repo= is supposed to be capable of

People present (lines said)

1. adamw (269)
2. tflink (78)
3. kparal (71)
4. j_dulaney (57)
5. bcl (30)
6. twu (27)
7. wwoods (21)
8. brunowolff (15)
9. pschindl (11)
10. zodbot (6)
11. rbergeron (4)
12. mkrizek (4)
13. jskladan (3)
14. Cerlyn (3)
15. maxamillion (3)
16. satellit_laptop (1)
17. mmaslano (1)
18. rmarko (1)
19. Viking-Ice (1)
20. limburgher (1)
21. nirik (1)
22. Southern_Gentlem (1)