#fedora-meeting: 2011-08-15 Fedora QA Meeting

Meeting summary

1. roll call (tflink, 15:00:39)
   
2. Previous Meeting Follow-Up (tflink, 15:05:33)
   1. 728891 successfully split up into separate bugs (tflink, 15:07:16)
   
   
3. Current Alpha Blockers (tflink, 15:07:58)
   1. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers (tflink, 15:08:08)
   2. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_16_Alpha_Release_Criteria (tflink, 15:09:10)
   
   
4. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730415 (tflink, 15:09:19)
   1. kickstart with user --name=blah results in traceback (tflink, 15:09:28)
   2. AGREED: 730415 - RejectedBlocker - Does not hit any of the alpha release criteria - repropose as beta blocker (tflink, 15:16:55)
   
   
5. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729500 (tflink, 15:17:08)
   1. Error while installing updates on Fedora 16 Alpha RC3 (tflink, 15:17:19)
   2. AGREED: - 729500 - RejectedBlocker - Have not been able to reproduce, rejecting as blocker. Re-propose if it shows up again. (tflink, 15:19:55)
   
   
6. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730438 (tflink, 15:20:10)
   1. SSL CA errors when reporting an installer bug to bugzilla (tflink, 15:20:22)
   2. fix available, test boot.iso is being built for karma now (tflink, 15:21:09)
   3. AGREED: - 730438 - AcceptedBlocker - he installer must be able to report failures to Bugzilla, with appropriate information included (tflink, 15:23:14)
   
   
7. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729599 (tflink, 15:23:36)
   1. PartitionException: msdos disk labels do not support partition names. (tflink, 15:23:45)
   2. https://www.redhat.com/archives/anaconda-devel-list/2011-August/msg00181.html (clumens, 15:28:23)
   3. AGREED: - 729599 - Doesn't hit any alpha criteria but could affect clean installs to disks with existing msdos partitions (tflink, 15:30:51)
   
   
8. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728707 (tflink, 15:32:53)
   1. on package upgrade RPM is removing empty directories accidentally (tflink, 15:33:01)
   2. AGREED: - 728707 - unless something new comes up, go with the rebuilds as a fix for the rpm issue and make sure RC4 has the new builds (tflink, 15:38:16)
   
   
9. RC3 Testing Status (tflink, 15:38:44)
   1. still missing KDE desktop validation, may wait for RC4 for those tests (tflink, 15:40:52)
   
   
10. Fedora 16 Alpha RC4 ready-ness (tflink, 15:42:15)
    1. next go/no-go meeting is on Wednesday (2011-08-17) (tflink, 15:43:45)
    2. due to all of the rebuilds needed for RC4, we should avoid carrying forward results from RC3 (tflink, 15:44:27)
    3. ACTION: robatino, adamw or tflink - do RC4 announcement once the compose is complete (tflink, 15:46:44)
    
    
11. Open Discussion (tflink, 15:48:45)
    1. AutoQA 0.6.1 released and deployed to fix some bugs (tflink, 15:50:49)
    2. https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/query?status=new&status=assigned&status=reopened&milestone=0.7.0 (kparal, 15:50:55)
    3. AutoQA 0.7.0 has been planned, work is progressing (tflink, 15:51:19)

Action items

1. robatino, adamw or tflink - do RC4 announcement once the compose is complete

Action items, by person

1. adamw
   1. robatino, adamw or tflink - do RC4 announcement once the compose is complete
2. tflink
   1. robatino, adamw or tflink - do RC4 announcement once the compose is complete

People present (lines said)

1. tflink (130)
2. adamw (106)
3. kparal (21)
4. maxamillion (16)
5. Viking-Ice (11)
6. clumens (10)
7. nb (6)
8. jsmith (6)
9. bcl (5)
10. rbergeron (4)
11. mkrizek (4)
12. dgilmore (3)
13. jskladan (2)
14. zodbot (2)
15. athmane (2)
16. Southern_Gentlem (1)
17. pjones (1)