#fedora-meeting: F16 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting

Meeting summary

1. 1. present: spot, codeblock, dgilmore, pjones, athmane, cebbert, jsmith-mobile, adamw (rbergeron, 21:03:42)
   
   
2. Go/No-Go Meeting (rbergeron, 21:04:07)
   1. the Purpose of the Go/No-Go is to gather yay/nay's from Release Engineering, QA, and devel on whether or not what we have put together is ready for release and meets the release criteria. (rbergeron, 21:05:28)
   2. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting (adamw, 21:06:17)
   3. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers <-- that one I know by heart, though. (rbergeron, 21:06:42)
   
   
3. Proposed Blockers (rbergeron, 21:09:50)
   1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729563 (rbergeron, 21:10:04)
   2. clumens has an updates image (linked in BZ) for people to try out. (rbergeron, 21:12:33)
   3. AGREED: : #729563, NTH Alpha, consider adding criterion for selinux must be enabled by default later. (rbergeron, 21:14:39)
   
   
4. http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729500 (rbergeron, 21:15:04)
   1. Error while installing updates on Fedora 16 Alpha RC3 (rbergeron, 21:15:20)
   2. AGREED: revisit #729563 at Blocker meeting friday, try to get more testers. PLEASE TEST THIS ONE AND TRY TO DUPLICATE, FOLKS! (rbergeron, 21:17:34)
   
   
5. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729528 (rbergeron, 21:17:53)
   1. #729528 - Unable to configure events in reporter to forward in anaconda for F-16-Alpha-RC3 (rbergeron, 21:18:09)
   2. AGREED: #729528 Alpha Blocker, per criterion of installer must be able to report failures to BZ, wiht appropriate info included. (rbergeron, 21:22:19)
   
   
6. http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729537 (rbergeron, 21:22:53)
   1. 729537 - Anaconda cannot report crashes in text mode in F16 Alpha RC3 due to missing report-cli (rbergeron, 21:23:14)
   2. AGREED: 729537 Alpha Blocker, per criterion of installer must be able to report failures to BZ, with appropriate info included. (rbergeron, 21:25:32)
   
   
7. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728707 (rbergeron, 21:25:48)
   1. 728707 - on package upgrade RPM is removing empty directories accidentally (rbergeron, 21:26:02)
   2. AGREED: 728707 is a blocker under 'must be able to install updates' criterion - this constitutes not installing updates properly (adamw, 21:33:36)
   
   
8. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729600 (adamw, 21:37:37)
   1. http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/15/html/Installation_Guide/Making_USB_Media-UNIX_Linux.html (jlk, 21:47:30)
   2. AGREED: 729600 not blocker or nth, installing from a dd'ed DVD iso is expected to require extra configuration. documentation should be improved to outline the steps required (adamw, 21:56:27)
   
   
9. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728863 (adamw, 21:57:30)
   
10. go/no-go vote (adamw, 22:00:30)
    1. AGREED: Fedora 16 Alpha is no-go at this time (adamw, 22:01:32)
    2. ACTION: rbergeron will take care of updating the schedules (adamw, 22:02:04)
    
    
11. open floor (adamw, 22:03:40)

Action items

1. rbergeron will take care of updating the schedules

Action items, by person

1. rbergeron
   1. rbergeron will take care of updating the schedules

People present (lines said)

1. adamw (167)
2. rbergeron (73)
3. pjones (66)
4. jlk (49)
5. dgilmore (36)
6. Viking_Alpha (35)
7. tflink (32)
8. clumens (22)
9. nirik (20)
10. zodbot (6)
11. spot (4)
12. cebbert (3)
13. athmane (2)
14. CodeBlock (2)
15. jsmith-mobile (1)
16. tk009 (1)
17. cwickert (1)
18. jsmith (1)