#fedora-meeting: Fedora QA Meeting

Meeting summary

1. Gathering critical mass (jlaska, 15:00:45)
   
2. Previous meeting follow-up (jlaska, 15:04:09)
   1. jlaska + adam - clear out CommonBugs? requests (jlaska, 15:04:40)
   2. ACTION: jlaska will discuss CommonBugs entry for 552423 with halfline (jlaska, 15:07:31)
   3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541645#c33 has the juice (adamw, 15:09:23)
   
   
3. Fedora 13 QA Retrospective (jlaska, 15:11:16)
   1. Feedback on QA execution of Fedora 13 testing is available at Fedora_13_QA_Retrospective. This document is intended to serve as a roadmap for Fedora 14 QA planning. (jlaska, 15:11:40)
   2. Next steps ... Jlaska planning to organize Fedora_13_QA_Retrospective feedback and present initial draft of recommendations next week. (jlaska, 15:11:54)
   
   
4. Proventester status (jlaska, 15:15:15)
   1. Adam Miller announced that the proventesters wiki page (QA/JoinProvenTesters) is no longer a draft. (jlaska, 15:15:50)
   2. We have several TRAC requests to join the proventesters group. (jlaska, 15:15:59)
   3. ACTION: Adamw will propose a document 'What do proventesters test for'? (jlaska, 15:17:34)
   4. https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/424 (jlaska, 15:18:35)
   5. ACTION: jlaska to check-in with lmacken on the status of https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/424 (jlaska, 15:18:53)
   6. ACTION: check with release engineering on whether 'proventester' karma is required for critpath packages (jlaska, 15:19:53)
   7. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/QA/JoinProvenTesters (jlaska, 15:23:07)
   8. ACTION: jlaska to update https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Join to include link to proventester page (jlaska, 15:24:52)
   
   
5. AutoQA initscripts test validation (jlaska, 15:26:36)
   1. Josef asked for help in validating a new round of SysVinitscript AutoQA tests. (jlaska, 15:26:50)
   2. http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-May/091311.html (jlaska, 15:26:55)
   
   
6. AutoQA prioritization (jlaska, 15:27:51)
   1. The immediate goal is to automate the QA:Package_Update_Acceptance_Test_Plan. What is the most efficient way to prioritize and balance outstanding tasks to accomplish this goal? (jlaska, 15:28:12)
   
   
7. Open discussion - What's in autoqa-0.3.5-1? (jlaska, 15:31:17)
   1. With several patches now in master, Wwoods asked if there were any other changes planned for the next version of autoqa (autoqa-0.3.5-1)? (jlaska, 15:31:26)
   
   
8. Open discussion - future of rpmlint (jlaska, 15:37:55)
   1. adamw asked how we should handle the devel@ thread around rpmlint (jlaska, 15:38:20)
   2. More discussion on autoqa-devel@ -- https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/autoqa-devel/2010-June/000616.html (jlaska, 15:39:26)
   
   
9. Open discussion - nss dependency issue (adamw, 15:49:34)
   1. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nss-softokn-3.12.4-23.fc13 (nirik, 15:53:30)
   2. ACTION: adamw to forward wwoods a good explanation of the nss-softokn problem scenario to ensure autoqa catches it in future (adamw, 16:01:09)
   
   
10. Open floor - AutoQA handling branched and rawhide (adamw, 16:04:48)
    1. ACTION: add autoqa FIXME links for a wiki page describing how to update repoinfo.conf when branched release is available, linked from the existing branched SOP pages (jlaska, 16:08:43)

Action items

1. jlaska will discuss CommonBugs entry for 552423 with halfline
2. Adamw will propose a document 'What do proventesters test for'?
3. jlaska to check-in with lmacken on the status of https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/424
4. check with release engineering on whether 'proventester' karma is required for critpath packages
5. jlaska to update https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Join to include link to proventester page
6. adamw to forward wwoods a good explanation of the nss-softokn problem scenario to ensure autoqa catches it in future
7. add autoqa FIXME links for a wiki page describing how to update repoinfo.conf when branched release is available, linked from the existing branched SOP pages

Action items, by person

1. adamw
   1. adamw to forward wwoods a good explanation of the nss-softokn problem scenario to ensure autoqa catches it in future
2. jlaska
   1. jlaska will discuss CommonBugs entry for 552423 with halfline
   2. jlaska to check-in with lmacken on the status of https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/424
   3. jlaska to update https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Join to include link to proventester page
3. wwoods
   1. adamw to forward wwoods a good explanation of the nss-softokn problem scenario to ensure autoqa catches it in future
4. UNASSIGNED
   1. Adamw will propose a document 'What do proventesters test for'?
   2. check with release engineering on whether 'proventester' karma is required for critpath packages
   3. add autoqa FIXME links for a wiki page describing how to update repoinfo.conf when branched release is available, linked from the existing branched SOP pages

People present (lines said)

1. jlaska (114)
2. adamw (77)
3. wwoods (69)
4. skvidal (34)
5. zodbot (5)
6. nirik (4)
7. Viking-Ice (3)
8. Oxf13 (2)