20:00:08 #startmeeting 20:00:08 Meeting started Thu Jan 21 20:00:08 2010 UTC. The chair is mmcgrath. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 20:00:08 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 20:00:14 * ricky 20:00:16 #topic Who's here? 20:00:18 * ricky 20:00:21 * jds2001 20:00:26 Hi 20:00:26 * wzzrd 20:00:49 * nirik is lingering in the back 20:00:50 Here. 20:00:53 Here 20:00:57 * sijis is here 20:01:02 I'm newby here 20:01:04 * a-k is 20:01:07 Lets see if we can get through the meeting without taking the wiki down or losing a chunk of one of our production switches. 20:01:39 OK, lets get started 20:01:43 #topic Infrastructure -- Tickets 20:01:47 * sijis is wondering how a meeting can take down the wiki 20:02:04 sijis: ehh, we lost the wiki twice last night for seemingly very strange reasons. 20:02:12 .tiny https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/query?status=new&status=assigned&status=reopened&group=milestone&keywords=~Meeting&order=priority 20:02:12 mmcgrath: http://tinyurl.com/47e37y 20:02:15 hey look, no tickets. 20:02:17 that makes this easy. 20:02:30 #topic boot.fedoraproject.org 20:02:32 :) 20:02:44 So this is kind of an odd topic since we don't really deal directly with the OS all that often. 20:02:53 but - http://boot.fedoraproject.org/ 20:02:59 is unofficially online. 20:03:06 I'd appreciate it if people with abilities can give it a try. 20:03:12 there's experimental stuff on there that flat out doesn't work 20:03:16 but install and rescue bits should 20:03:44 Has anyone had a chance to play with it yet? 20:03:44 Anyway to generate a list of what's hosted semi-automatically? 20:04:10 abadger1999: on fedorahosted? 20:04:24 On boot.fp.o 20:04:36 The images we can boot. 20:04:55 mmcgrath: boot is wicked; anything specific you want tested? 20:04:55 abadger1999: ah, I'll try to get one together, at the moment just install media. I'm hoping to get live media going though 20:05:05 wzzrd: just it, over and over and over. 20:05:11 doing it as we speak 20:05:18 if it's buggy I don't want to expose the users to it yet. 20:05:42 abadger1999: oh, and some other tools are on there. 20:05:46 is BKO officially launcehd yet? 20:05:51 is this going to be the new way to install fedora? 20:05:59 the thing that's nice is we can update it without having to force people to re-burn the image. 20:06:13 jds2001: good question, I'm not sure if he's advertising it actively or not yet. 20:06:22 BFO (based on BKO) is not yet official but I have a feature request in 20:06:29 sijis: it's going to be "a new way" to install fedora 20:06:44 won't this cost massive bandwidth? or doesn't that matter? 20:06:52 gotcha, an alternative 20:07:05 wzzrd: actually, as it stands right now, it won't. 20:07:09 since it relies on the mirrors. 20:07:24 having said that... if we go into live media.. That gets much trickier. 20:07:31 yeah 20:07:33 and involves some architectural decisions. 20:07:49 I may not post them at all, I may just point to what BKO already has setup. 20:07:53 mmcgrath: is there anything about boot.fp.o that requires releng to put content somewhere different/else/triggersomething/whatever? 20:08:17 Oxf13: not really, the one thing I was hoping from you guys is to get some things into our default initrd's that aren't there now 20:08:20 like iscsi and nfs support 20:08:38 other then that I don't think there's any changes for anyone. 20:08:43 I've been trying to get notting and warthog to talk about that for months :/ 20:09:00 Oxf13: as I understand it there's an ordering problem with dracut. 20:09:07 I really don't know what the deal is 20:09:26 Oxf13: perhaps after the meeting you can step me through exactly what command you run to build an ISO and I can do some tests and see if I can get it working. 20:09:32 I've gotten it working after the fact. 20:09:39 but in the actual build process I'm a little confused what is going on 20:09:39 sure 20:10:03 Anyone else have any questions about that? 20:10:25 If not we'll move on. 20:10:28 k 20:10:32 #topic The outages last night 20:10:35 So last night was weird. 20:10:44 special thanks for ricky and nigel for taking care of things. 20:11:03 The wiki went out twice, then we lost a switch blade in one of our switches. 20:11:09 that's now replaced as of an hour or two ago. 20:11:19 We're not sure if the switch issues caused the wiki issues or not 20:11:33 really not much else to say about that. 20:11:36 #topic NTP 20:11:39 smooge: this all done? 20:11:56 NTP is done 20:12:29 I have some puppet errors about being unable to remove the ntp package 20:12:38 Some machines need system-config-date for something, and thus need ntp 20:12:39 ricky: how many errors? 20:12:48 So I'd juts disable the service and not remove the package in ntp::noclient 20:12:54 all hardware systems should be running NTP 20:13:06 oh ok 20:13:12 I can change the logic 20:13:14 compose machines, spin1, publictest2 20:13:15 sorry didn't know that 20:13:21 No worries, it didn't cause any harm 20:13:31 mmcgrath: Oxf13: the ordering problem is that there's no way to tell rpm to order something earlier in the transaction /if and only if/ it's already there. 20:13:40 ricky: so non-RHEL hosts? 20:13:51 well I was planning on installing it on all machines at first and just have it not running.. but I was worried if that was outside of standard scope 20:13:56 Ah, looks like it, didn't notice that. 20:14:20 pjones: is there some command we can run in %post? 20:14:54 not really; for mpath I'm probably going to change anaconda to set hostonly in the dracut config and rebuild the initrd at the end of install. which sucks. 20:15:05 (we could make other things do that as well) 20:15:30 pjones: mind if I ping you after the meeting for more? 20:15:45 mmcgrath: no problem 20:15:51 smooge: ricky: we can take a look after the meeting 20:15:54 ricky: what is the error btw? 20:15:56 np 20:16:11 Thu Jan 21 17:10:55 +0000 2010 //ntp::noclient/Package[ntp]/ensure (err): change from 4.2.4p8-1.fc13 t 20:16:14 o absent failed: Execution of '/bin/rpm -e ntp-4.2.4p8-1.fc13.x86_64' returned 1: error: Failed depend 20:16:18 encies: ntp is needed by (installed) system-config-date-1.9.53-1.fc13.noarch 20:16:38 ricky: thanks. 20:16:59 we should use yum to remove it :) 20:17:03 Ok, any questions on that? 20:17:11 dgilmore: I think puppet actually used to do that. 20:17:53 Ok, moving along 20:17:58 #topic Search Engine 20:18:01 a-k: around? 20:18:05 yep 20:18:15 One of our candidates, Xapian, is on publictest3 20:18:25 I got it to crawl fedoraproject.org to a depth of 4 (after about 4 hours of running) 20:18:26 how'd the crawl go? 20:18:34 I expected disk to be the issue, but it was memory, instead 20:18:45 The indexer chewed up all the memory at a depth of 5 (after about 10 hours of running) 20:18:52 So I backed off one level 20:19:04 The search tool is available at: 20:19:11 #link http://publictest3.fedoraproject.org/cgi-bin/omega 20:19:23 Nutch is next to do 20:19:30 I'll update the wiki with the new info on publictest 20:19:42 huzaifas also says he'll be updating the wiki with the stuff he's evaluated in the past month or so 20:19:52 That's about it for now 20:19:55 a-k: excellent. 20:19:58 seems pretty peppy 20:20:02 a-k: do you need more memory? 20:20:06 how much does pt3 have now? 20:20:24 I don't know if the memory issue was a leak or if it really needs more 20:20:36 We could always try more, if you're up for it 20:20:44 But I don't know how much more more is 20:20:54 its got 2gb 20:21:03 A 2g of swap 20:21:06 jds2001: it's x86_64 though :-/ 20:21:07 hmm 20:21:11 I wonder if we should rebuild it i386 20:21:26 mmcgrath: it's at ibiblio, so we've got plenty of resources there 20:21:34 Where will it run when deployed? 20:21:49 ... if ever ... 20:21:59 yeah 20:22:02 on the app servers, i think.... 20:22:05 a-k: probably across multiple hosts in PHX2 20:22:11 a-k: can I reboot publictest3 right now? 20:22:21 reboot, sure 20:22:49 But it will run on x86_64, right, so we should test there 20:22:54 mmcgrath: how are you doing this? :) 20:23:00 a-k: it may or may not. 20:23:12 a-k: we run lots of stuff on i386 and get a considerable memory savings on some. 20:23:32 a-k: ok, publictest3 is booting and now has 4G of RAM. 20:23:34 we'll see if that helps. 20:23:47 Anyone have any other questions about that? 20:24:32 jds2001: I'm doing it on ibiblio1 if that's what you're asking? 20:25:26 anywho, that's that 20:25:31 #topic Noobs? 20:25:38 Any new people around that want to say hey? 20:25:42 Im a noob 20:25:50 <_yawns_> hey 20:25:55 nullsys: yeah, you're working with the websites team right? 20:25:57 Welcome 20:25:58 and helped with blogs? 20:26:01 Hi 20:26:12 * wzzrd is a noob too :-) 20:26:25 * dgilmore is n00b 20:26:30 hiemanshu, been around a week or two. Working on blogsadmin, helping out with website team on a few projects. Im an ambassador and in the freemedia group. Also working with MooDoo to head the fedora-uk stuff too. 20:26:40 sorry, "hi" + tab again lol. 20:26:52 nullsys: excellent, welcome 20:26:56 thanks :) 20:27:08 _yawns_: you're new? what brings you to Infrastructure? 20:27:13 nullsys: fix it :) 20:27:25 Told you i'd bug you :P 20:27:39 <_yawns_> interested in helping how I can 20:27:57 <_yawns_> not really sure exactly in what fashion yet 20:28:33 Im sure plenty of projects require allsorts of happy. Have you had a look at the different ways you can "join"? 20:28:58 <_yawns_> I had a look around a bit last night and saw this meeting today 20:29:00 _yawns_: interested just in something in Fedora or in Infrastructure specifically? 20:29:35 <_yawns_> Infrastructure seemed to match my interest the most as well as skill set 20:29:55 _yawns_: well make sure you've read through - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/GettingStarted 20:30:08 <_yawns_> I hope you don't mind if I sit in and listen for a while 20:30:11 <_yawns_> will do 20:30:15 jaxjax: I know you're new here, tell us a bit about yourself and what you were interested in doing. 20:30:23 _yawns_: of course not. 20:30:24 If I could offer any advice here, it would be to contact any project leaders your interested in helping out with. Also a good setup for your wiki user page would help any questions asked. Good luck with it. 20:30:50 <_yawns_> Thanks :) 20:31:04 Hi I'm interested about virtualization and stor 20:31:17 Sorry storage 20:31:32 jaxjax: ah, have you read through the GettingStarted page? 20:31:38 But will help with everything you think I can help with 20:31:50 Yeah I did 20:32:09 Sent my intro last days 20:32:27 I think I can help a lot just let me how 20:32:43 jaxjax: excellent, lets meet up after the meeting 20:32:49 Sure 20:33:30 Ok, anyone have anything else to say before I open the floor? 20:34:13 k 20:34:16 #topic Open Floor 20:34:23 Anyone have anything in particular they'd like to discuss? 20:34:49 i saw gregdek has created a cloud sig 20:34:56 wzzrd: he did, I'm on it. 20:34:58 "cloud" 20:35:11 :) 20:35:12 is that something the Infra team will cooperate in, in any way? 20:35:32 wzzrd: well, that's a complex question. Fedora was actually going to offer some free guests running in the cloud. 20:35:39 but the software to manage that cloud never really got put together. 20:35:53 so it's very much left in a state of limbo at the moment. 20:36:19 i guess management software like that gets real complex real quick 20:36:38 wzzrd: espeically when the requirements are completely spelled out. 20:36:52 mmcgrath: or they are - but they're spelled out mostly in klingon :) 20:36:57 heh 20:37:02 Oh, one thing I wanted to mention 20:37:26 did everyone have a chance to look through - http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/csi/host-lifecycle-policy/ 20:37:29 ? 20:37:38 Nothing too objectionable about it? 20:38:08 pretty long read; not completely through it 20:38:13 "cloud" poop 20:38:25 wzzrd: yeah, we also have a security policy that's worth a look. 20:38:36 oh, and the free software policy :) 20:38:37 http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/csi/free-software-policy/ 20:38:43 http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/csi/security-policy/ 20:38:55 my eyes are almost square from reading fp.o stuff already :) 20:39:18 'eyes are almost square' 20:39:22 I'll have to remember that one 20:39:30 heh 20:39:37 the cloud sig will first focus on getting our EC2 presence up to date 20:39:38 is that the wrong way to say it? 20:39:42 and moving forward keeping it up to date 20:39:52 after that, not sure what the next goal will be 20:39:56 wzzrd: I'm sure it's not - I've just never heard it before 20:40:00 Oxf13: yeah, that's a worthy goal at least. 20:40:18 skvidal: literally translated from Dutch 20:40:28 Ok, so anyone have anything else to say? if not we'll end the meeting a little early today 20:40:30 wzzrd: it sounds great 20:41:29 ok then, done :) 20:41:31 #endmeeting