there's vague consensus that we should have
package defaults that are 'very secure' and then per-spin
customization for less security (if desired)(jlaska,
16:23:03)
no-one has really stepped up and said 'yeah
there's a plan and we're doing it here'(jlaska,
16:23:17)
skvidal drafted a change policy and sent to
fesco mailing list last week(jlaska,
16:23:42)
next step ... file a FESCO ticket asking fesco
to look into the issue and help us move towards a security
policy(jlaska,
16:31:47)
ACTION: adamw will
reach out to FESCO for guidance on defining a security policy(jlaska,
16:32:53)
kparal has a few autoqa patches out for review
- adding --help and --dry-run options to all watchers(jlaska,
16:45:32)
kparal plans to contribute to the 'Getting
started' use case once changes are in(jlaska,
16:46:03)
kparal some progress on integrating rpmguard,
more work remains(jlaska,
16:47:24)
Wwoods accepted kparal's local autoqa harness
patch ... tests can now be launched on your local system to
facilitate test development/integration(jlaska,
16:49:30)
wwoods improved support for running 'noarch'
tests - tests like rpmlint, which don't need to run on the same
arch as the target package/tree(jlaska,
16:53:49)
wwoods updated repoinfo to reflect the fact
that there's no ppc rawhide anymore(jlaska,
16:54:01)
wwoods plans ... some FUDCon prep work and
helping kparal integrate rpmguard(jlaska,
16:54:42)
thanks to help from abadger1999,
autoqa-israwhidebroken is now packaged. I sent a link to the branch
to autoqa-devel. If folks are happy, I can merge that into
master(jlaska,
16:56:40)
Open Discussion - <your topic here>(jlaska, 16:59:08)